It could be an innocent mistake. I know i give out my personal email passwords to complete strangers on buses all the time.

Here's the story as it ran at CNN:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Northeast/05/13/berg.encounter/

"It turned out this guy was a terrorist and that he, you know, used my son's e-mail, amongst many other people's e-mail who he did the same thing to," Berg said.

Oh really, I wonder who else? 

Just laughing to myself because if that is true.... I can't even imagine how that whole thing would go down..... I used to ride the bus quite a bit and I can remember where two strangers got on with a converstaion.... maybe three times out of 100.... and those lasted less than 10 min.

agreeing to share an e-mail address?..... I don't even know of any married couples who would share an email..... yet they still believe.

stole an email account.... more likely.... but what would be the goal of that?

the whole thing stinks.... but it all paid off for Nick Berg....didn't it?

Because if you don't believe that the planes at the WTC were CGI then it must mean that no video ever was or ever will be "faked".

If you don't believe that a spacebeam took down the towers then you must believe that beam weapons aren't in development or ever will be.

Is that what you're trying to say?

Are you sure that box is small enough for you?

Jackass.

This is such an obvious shill tactic--give something a bad name (video faking) and it must of course be discounted in every case.

I seriously doubt not only Nick Berg's beheading ever took place, but also Daniel Pearl's. Both those guys are still alive, under the particular brand of deep cover called "presumed dead". Remember that from day 1 (9/11/01) we have been treated to a fantastic run of global-reality-based THEATRE. It was and is designed to appeal to people who are accustomed to forming their worldview and opinions through television and movies. The line between "good guys" and "bad guys" is so clearly drawn as to be as trite as any bad hollywood thriller.

Thanks to Ron Suskind, we know that at least one person inside the White House believes themself to be a creator of reality for the dumbed down masses. It's obviously not just one person with a touch of this megalomania, I'm sure a lot of people who are clinging to the official story do so because it makes them feel powerful to know something about the world profoundly at odds with what "the little people" believe.

To watch them not be able to let go, because it would mean having to accept that they are not the omnipotent puppet masters they fancied themselves to be is very satisfying. We're talking about a LOT of people here who basically made a deal with the devil, because they assumed that they were so much smarter than most other people, only to realize that they grossly overestimated their intelligence relative to "the masses".

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

I agree with most of that dude. I definitely think that Daniel Pearl's death is very fishy, there are some very weird links with the ISI etc, and Berg's beheading is also just strange and just seems like some kind of psy-op. But I can't see why those guys would be kept alive, especially Pearl.