From all the comments in the last COINTELPRO post, it seems like many people think that anyone who supports the no plane theory and energy weapons theories is labeled a disinfo agent that needs to be stopped, censored and destroyed at all costs.

I think this line of thinking is very dangerous and close minded. The truth is, I don’t know what happened to those buildings. I do know that it wasn’t a few jet fuel fires that made them explode into dust. I don’t know if thermite was used, if only conventional explosives were used, if there was some sort of black technology used, who knows eh? I’m not a scientist. I don’t know what hit those towers, if it was a plane, what kind of plane, who knows? All I can do is make my best guess from the information I’ve been exposed too. However, we cannot be so close minded with respect to all these “alternative theories”. Let everyone do their research and have it put up for others to read, discuss and then we can all draw our own opinions. I think this movement as a whole should be able to keep an open mind, since it took an open mind to accept that 9/11 wasn’t what it appeared to be.

But I certainly do not think that people like Killtown are COINTELPRO agents out there to disrupt and destroy our movement. People who believe in these theories want a new investigation just like the rest of us. These people should be allies, rather than enemies. There is no need to be so threatened by someone with a different opinion than you have. We are all fighting for the same thing. TRUTH. And I don’t think anyone really knows that the truth really is. We all have different opinions about 9/11, and that should be encouraged. I hope that people continue to look into every aspect and possibility because it can be very dangerous if we all follow down the same path with a close mind, thinking we have all the answers.

Ever since I watched the lecture by Jeff King, aka MIT Engineer, aka Plague Puppy, I found that presentation very effective in summarizing the argument for controlled demolition. I’ve had a lot of respect for Jeff King because it really appears like this is a very intelligent person who was able to describe the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers with remarkable clarity and rationality. Here is link for the lecture I’m referring to (the lecture starts about 1min into the video and it is also featured in 9/11 revisited)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248

This was one of the first lectures I watched after seeing Loose Change what seems like forever ago, but I guess it’s only been about a year. After loose change I was pretty convinced, but after seeing this, there was no doubt left in my mind that the buildings fell from controlled demolition.

Even to this day, I still feel like Jeff King is the best person we have in the movement to explain the collapse of the towers. He appeared on Webster Tarpley’s radio show in March 2006, and had another chance to give another great explanation for controlled demolition. I’m sure most of you haven’t heard this audio clip, but it’s another great explanation for controlled demolition. (I have edited the clip from the show to bring you all a 10min version of the controlled demolition explanation).
http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth912/jeffkingcd2.mp3

These two explanations (the video and audio) to me are the most concise and rational explanations for controlled demolition. At the time I heard this interview, I hadn’t heard much about the no plane theories at the Twin Towers or theories about energy weapons. I had taken a brief look at Nico’s work, and I didn’t think the evidence was very convincing. I was still open to the idea, since pretty much anything is possible once you know 9/11 was an inside job, but I had never heard any explanation that I thought was a convincing or rational. I didn’t think any of the “evidence” for the no plane theories was even comprehendible, let alone anything could even be considered a persuasive explanation. Fuzzy clips on UTube of planes losing their wings, or nose bits of a nose cone going through a building was pretty much all I was looking at and I considered this theory pretty crazy.

Then, later on in Tarpley’s show, he is asked to comment on the no plane theory and the energy weapon theory. So I would encourage everyone to listen to what Jeff King had to say about the subject, since, like his controlled demolition evaluation, his evaluation of the no plane theory and energy weapons theories is equally rational and concise. (clip is roughly 5min)

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth912/kingblacktech.mp3

After hearing this explanation, I found it far more convincing than anything Nico or anyone else was trying to show with a bunch of weird U-Tube videos. I admit that Jeff King seems to be far more intelligent than me and especially far more knowledgeable in science and engineering. So if Jeff King considers it a possibility, who am I to say that it’s not? I can certainly understand why someone would believe in the no plane or energy weapons theories. I am personally undecided on what really happened. I can say that I haven’t come to a definite conclusion and that my mind is open to both possibilities. I certainly do take offence to the attacks on people who believe this happened. This movement cannot attack one another for holding, what I consider to be, a rational perspective. And that statement goes both ways. We are all fighting for the same thing here, and that’s a new investigation and publicity and recognition of all the anomies surrounding 9/11. If we stopped attacking each other for holding opposing views, we can unite to attack the real enemy who hold certainly holds the most irrational view that 9/11 was an attack by 19 hijackers.

I bet if we took a poll of random 9/11 Truthers, I bet half would think a missile hit the pentagon and half would think it was a plane. However, I think we can all agree that it wasn’t a Boeing 757 or AA77. But does it matter who thinks a missile hit the Pentagon and who thinks it was a mid sized plane? I personally think that it was a mid sized remote control plane that may have fired a missile or something on impact, combine with explosives inside the building itself (the hole in C-Ring?). But who knows eh? Maybe it was a missile? I certainly don’t know for sure. This is just what I consider the most likely possibility, but I definitely wouldn’t demonize and polarize someone for thinking a missile hit the Pentagon. I would just point them towards the evidence that shows that a mid-sized plane hit the Pentagon, and they could do the same. If they still think that a missile hit the Pentagon after looking at both sides, that’s fine. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. What is dangerous is if we proceed with a close mind and think that we know all the answers. I think it’s very strange that this movement in particular would have this problem. We all are fighting for the same thing. We’re on the same team. We’re a movement that has united because we all kept an open mind to things. We questioned authority, popular opinion, and didn’t believe we had all the answers to an event that most people consider an open and shut case.

I know that I would be proud and thankful to protest alongside anyone fighting for a new investigation. Even if it’s just someone who watched “9/11 Press for Truth” and wanted a new investigation to investigate evidence of foreknowledge and ISI connections. If we get a new investigation, and get scholars throughout the world to research every aspect of the events of 9/11, the truth will hopefully come out. We’re facing an uphill battle against one of the most sinister and sophisticated enemies this world has ever faced. If we’re going to stand a chance, we’re going to have to do this together. We’re going to have to stop fighting, unite, and get out there and make a difference. Get involved with your local 9/11 Truth Group. If there is no local group in your area, then start one yourself. Do something productive, anything but attack my teammates. I consider anyone willing to fight for 9/11 Truth my teammate, and we should all keep that in mind.

This is the kind of movement that I would like to be a part of. A movement of love, friendship, respect and action. I am trying to make my website, http://www.truth911.net , representative of this vision. I will be working with Richard Andrew Grove and anyone else who wants to help, to add content to my website and create essentially an online media outlet to overthrow the current media system. This website attempts to create a central resource for all the movies, videos, information and research that the 9/11 Truth Movement has produced. I will attempt to use traditional media propaganda techniques against itself, by using public relations tactics of branding an edgy logo and presenting information in a well designed, eye pleasing, website. Posters can be easily printed, photocopied and plastered overtop of billboards and other advertisements. A new opening video has been added to the front page of my site to act as a commercial for the site to intrigue visitors into exploring the site. If this sounds like something you would like to be a part of, I would encourage you all to have a look at my website, http://www.truth911.net , and let me know if you would like to help out and contribute to what will hopefully be a central resource for the 9/11 Truth Movement. This movement needs to come together over a website to use as a central resource. At the moment, I’d have to say that 911truth.org is currently serving that function. I think this is a pressing issue we face, since it would be far more beneficial to support a site like mine, rather than one which tries to sell you things that are available for free and makes it difficult, especially for beginners, to find the strongest evidence the 9/11 truth movement has complied. Everything on my site is free, there are no adds, and I attempt to publish all material, not just related to 9/11, that needs to be exposed to the public. This is at least what I am trying to accomplish, and I could use all the help I can get.