Uhm INCORPORATION AS A 5013C IS BAD. The IRS can control what you say, or at least threaten your tax-exempt status because of it.

I think Fetzer has been effective in the past, and I like his approach to a lot of issues and his logical method, but I think he has just about lost me with this and the Laser-beam thing.

Even if a legitimate scientist thought it was feasible, that is the kind of thing that sounds so ridiculous to the average person, like the no-planes, that you just don't go there. Stick with the message that is working and with what can be proven.

I am glad to see that Dr. Jones is distancing himself from St911, and I think the more credible people in the movement will probably follow suit if they have not already.

He always found it hard to stick to the facts and strong logic.

But c'mon - what he does now... you would NEVER suspect this kind of behaviour from a respected scholar.
Has he forgot what science is?
Is Judy Wood spreading a virus of some sort?

i agree, although i liked his style(his shredding of Ollie North was classic-"you know all about compartmentalization Ollie" HAHA!). i also respected much of his JFK work and loved his book on the murder of Paul Wellstone. but to see hows he acting now is a real dissapointment to say the least.

that you all will join me in promoting my soon to be released new short-subject film. (not to be confused with my 3 hour film to be released in 2007)

it deals with the subject of disinformation - misinformation - and the history of cointelpro.

I examine the "research" of Judy Wood - Nico Haupt - Morgan Reynolds - Dr. Fetzer - WingTV - WebFairy - Criminal Politics - as well as demonstrating the KNOWN instances of FBI cointelpro from the 1960s utilized against the Black Panthers and Dr. Martin Luther King.

It asks the question: Cointelpro. They have done it before. Are they doing it again?

Why do I ask you to promote my film? This is not a shameless act of self-promotion. None of my films have ever been "for profit."

It is just my opinion that the movement needs to unify behind exposing this for what it is. The film should leave no doubt as to what this research represents to this movement - and only WE can expose it and neutralize it.

I have considered Fetzer to be basically genuine, but easily misled into useless areas of research (such as whether the Zapruder film was altered). Now it looks as though his nuttiness is deliberate...

Finally an area where I have some expertise to contribute. It can be proven fairly easily that no high energy space weapons were used on the twin towers.

1) The spacelift argument: There have been hundreds of secret payloads over the past half century, but no secret launches - a rocket launch is impossible to conceal. Furthermore, the lift capability of various vehicles is well known. This puts some serious limitations on what can be in space.

Imagine you are watching the only road that leads to a construction site. You count five trucks with twenty ton capacity that drove there. Even though the construction site is hidden, you know they aren't building a hundred thousand ton aircraft carrier there, because they only have a hundred tons of material to work with. There can't be any massive Death Stars in orbit, there just aren't enough mystery payloads to build anything massive in orbit.

2) Now with space there is another factor, most orbiting objects are easy to see, even with the naked eye, not to mention radar. The solar panels make excellent reflectors at dawn and dusk. But we will assume for a moment that this supposed weapons platform is a nuclear powered stealth satellite, covered with black radar absorbing material - whatever.

3) Then we have the problem of time on station. Assume the same disintegrator ray weapons platform destroyed both towers. There is a problem with that. If the platform was in low orbit, like the ISS, it would have traveled about 4000 miles between the destruction of the two towers. It couldn't have been over New York the whole time. Either you need two weapons platforms or you have to put your disintegrator ray on geosynchronous orbit. But that makes matters worse. Due to the mass of propellant required to reach geo, the mass that can be placed in geo orbit is only about a third of the mass that can be placed in low orbit.. So now you are talking about a platform under ten tons which can destroy two MASSIVE targets at 23,000 miles distance. Yeah, right.

4) Ok, back to the two platforms in low orbit theory. You still need a LOT of energy to disintegrate skyscrapers even at a distance of around 200 miles. Hard to do this with batteries. So most of the Star Wars fantasies dreamed of using nuclear explosions to fire an X-ray laser (this also destroys the orbital platform, but never mind, we already decided we had to use two platforms). Well, even if that could be done, it obviously wasn't done:

A) It would have produced a flash in the sky visible in daytime with the naked eye
B) The EMP would have fried electronics below, so no videos or digital photographs could have been made
C) The X-ray beam even if very well focused, the scatter would have fogged all the photographic film in Manhattan, so no photos from film cameras.
D) Every nation with gamma ray detectors would have been screaming bloody murder about the violation of the weapons in space treaty.
E) There would have been beautiful auroras over the northeast that night like you would not believe -didn't happen.

The space beam idea is NOT a scientific hypothesis, and is easily disproved. The advocates of such ideas are - at best - ignorant of science. For those who can be expected by their resumes to know some science, deliberate disinformation is the best explanation.

PS: In the real world this poster is an honors graduate of Caltech

Feel free to link or cut and post elsewhere.

Fetzer is part of a disinformation campaign. I lean more towards the concept of him being mentally compromised. Either that or he just got wacky on us.

If it's good I'll promote the hell out of it.

I'm so sick of these scumbags.

What an ego.
Server is full for Carrols show...set winamp to loop.