Recent Headlines
'Rescue Me' to feature 9/11 plot line
CIA Had Mumbai Foreknowledge
Kevin Ryan: Tales From Two Naomis
Ed Asner supports AE911Truth
Jim Fassell pledges $250k to 9/11 Charities
Dr. Bowman's Obama Letter
Did FBI get their man in Bruce Ivins?
Richard Falk: "9/11: More Than Meets The Eye"
A damning admission on the Georgian War
UPDATED: The Facts Speak For Themselves
Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
Japan: Fujita Continues to Challenge 9/11
STJ911 Misrepresented in Draft Bill
Recent Media
9/11 Debate: Jon Gold Vs. Debunker
Howard Zinn's recent comments on 9/11
Penttbom.com video footage
Richard Gage, AIA on Spanish TV
New 9/11 WTC videos posted - 10.31.2008
Peter Dale Scott & Dan Hamburg
Graeme MacQueen & Michael Keefer v. Debunkers
THE MAFIA, THE CIA AND GEORGE BUSH
Michael Wolsey interviews Richard Gage, AIA
Fabled Enemies
The Elephant in the Room
visit 911podcasts.com for more multimedia
Blogads
Asbestos Dangers

Mesothelioma is a dreaded cancer that is nearly always caused by just one factor: asbestos exposure.
FACT: Family members of those who are regularly exposed to high levels of asbestos also have a high risk of developing malignant mesothelioma.
Get the news, get the facts.
Banner Exchange
buy a DVD or book to support this site & 1st responders
User login
9/11 Related Sites
911Research.WTC7.net
9/11 Environmental Action
911review.com
911proof.com
911Truth.org
truthmove.org
911pressfortruth.com
patriotsquestion911.com
911revisited.com
william911.com
Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
International Citizens' Inquiry Into 9/11
truthaction.org
911readingroom.org
9eleven.info
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
deceptiondollar.com
legitgov.org
911omissionreport.com
timetowakeup.net
911tv.org
grandtheftcountry.com
Youth for 9/11 Truth
truth911.net
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
explosive911analysis.com
flight93crash.com
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
supportthetruth.com
mime11.com
physics911.net
911docs.net
nw0.info
investigate911.com
theultimateconspiracy.com
9/11 International Sites
911sandhed.nu
www.i11time.dk
investigar11s.org
911truth.no
911belgium.be
v911truth.org
stoplying.ca
911truth.eu
911truthpeterborough.com
luogocomune.net
911info.se
1192001.dk
11syyskuu.org
serendipity.li
eqgen.nl/aanslagen911
onderzoek911.nl
waarheid911.nl
zapruder.nl
911truthbristol.com
911truthtotnes.com
september11.se
vaken.se
911oz.com
nineeleven.co.uk
hintergrund.de
broeckers.com
thecoop.tv
operation911.de
medienanalyse-international.de
911komplott.de
deepjournal.com
truth4peace.co.uk
911truthskipton.com
wytruth.org.uk
reopen911.info
editionsdemilune.com
cremationofcare.com
Investigate 9/11
9/11 Truth Europe
911.yweb.sk
9/11 Memorial Sites
Alternative News Sites
The Real News.com
Featured Story
TV News Lies
Garlic & Grass
infowars.com
meria.net
whatreallyhappened.com
rinf.com
knowledgedrivenrevolution.com
informationclearinghouse.info
globalresearch.ca
globaloutlook.ca
The Revolutionist
mathaba.net
bushtrash.com
flybynews.com
fracturednews.com
thefairandbalancednews.com
Concurrent development - the baseball model
Short version
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1umznssiZU
Long version posted recently by CBB.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YOu2Qy0A0s
The longer version show's a wider angle before the magic zoom and the "arrival" of the translucent blob. I took a screenie at the opening moment of the scene, I did it again, and got the exact same time, 7:38.
It's only a rough estimate of distance, but it cant be too far out.
Remind me never to fly with
It looks like to me......
and this is just my opinion - but it looks like to me that the whole cadre of no-planes, mini-nukes, star war beams, keebler elves areas of research - which is fronted by the SAME small group of highly conspicuous researchers - is simply intentional organized disruption - cointelpro - designed to smear the entire 9/11 movement.
The rresearch itself is without merit - usually laughable - and obviously being spamming this board.
I would simply ask visitors to 911Blogger to put this in perspective - and add this to the list of OBVIOUS coverups.
John your paranoid ravings
Yur the spammer, fer sure
Same Playbook
No
its just my opinion that the sheer volume if these blogs pushing no-planes and other absurdist themes, are consistantly given a very low rating from the community - and constitutes spam at best - and organiized disruption at worst.
why is it that the lowest rated blogs have the highest volume? why are we being swamped with blogs that the community is VOTING DOWN?
That's my opinion - and that is what these message boards are for. sharing.
If you are going to post THIS many no-planes tin foil hat blogs- you must learn to accept the feedback from the community.
My particular approach in dealing with these tremendously unpopular and unwelcome blogs is to simply state my opinion - that it appears to be disinformation - and without merit - either scientifically our socially within the community.
Now - that's not paranoid. That's just a sober assessment of your "contributions"
Sometimes the only safe place to sit is on the fence
To be fair, Peggy, the spamming and repetition is coming from both 'camps'.
I have tried, and keep trying, to follow the new developments in the unpopular research that , yes, John, a small number of truthers are undertaking in the face of ridicule and ad hominem attacks, though I have noticed that yours have become much more polite, thankfully.
There is irony in the fact that many people tell us to ignore these posts , and yet they attract large numbers of comments.
I would say that the researchers, who are far to disorganised and chaotic to be government agents ( with all due respect to him, would you choose Nico to do your disinfo work? No one can understand his posts) have the responsibility not to bore the pants off us by keeping on posting the same pictures. Let's have only new material or at least fresh angles.
However the detractors too should not keep issuing the same stern dictacts. I know that they feel passionately about this issue, and I can symapthise with that, although I think they are wrong to talk of COINTELPRO and the like. Once again I would ask people to look up the track record of guys like Nico and Killtown who have been working for years to expose the truth.
So - keep it brief and keep it polite. Talk of scum and the like is unhelpful and plays right into the hands of the enemy. And I'm sorry if I am repeating myself.
Stick to what we know!
Have a question?,,FINE! It hurts the truth to speculate.
It's just my opinion but in
homer
September Clues Part 2 & Part 4
If the Media are the Perps, how is anyone expected to get the info out? Since we are a Mass Media society?
The main issue behind Dylan Avery's refusal to even allow anyone to speak about this in his presence and to listen to none of it. And obviously to refuse to think about it or even entertain the concept, is his conviction that thousands of eyewitnesses saw the inpact onto the South Tower. I read this from his Forum.
This assumption of his is simply not true. The TV gave him that impression and led people to believe that is true. He believes the world of TV and that the people represented through it and himself are a "we."
As in "you are denying what *we* all saw in downtown New York that day?"
Which is what he said. Even though he was in Oneonta.
September Clues Part 4
Who is "We", Kee-mo-sah-bee?
In what Avery considers his destruction of Killtown on the subject, which was on Revolution Radio and which you can hear three different versions of on my blog, Avery says, "Are you calling Rose a liar?"
Avery's moved to LA/Hollywood now, so I guess he thinks all of the Network people who "witnessed" the event, including Rose Arce, who is on the reocrd as changing her story, and himself, are a "we."
First off, Rose Arce ends up never saying what Avery quotes her as saying. Never. She never even said it. But if you listen carefully you'll notice Avery calls her by her first name. When I originally heard the interview I assumed Avery had personal inside info - that he knew Rose Arce. But he replied to me when I asked him if he had inside info. , (since NIST had named the person who took the vid in question as Micheal Herzakhani), "are you deaf?" and repeated that he had seen it on CNN "America Remembers." - which I had watched after he made that reference and discovered that Rose Arce had said none of what Avery imagined she had said. This was why I asked. And this was after Avery had claimed to have watched the Specia, in his own words, "millions of times."
Avery really believes the people who talk to him through the TV are his friends, that he knows them and that he is on a first name basis with them. The TV world is very real to him. The TV has also suggested to him that thousands of people saw this thing, when it is obvious to anyone who lives in New York City and who asks around and who questions carefully...it's just not true. Everyone saw it on TV. And everyone is so conditioned by the TV they believe they actually saw it and that "thousands" saw it.
Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - "Horselover Fat" Phillip K. Dick
Here are numerous eye- and earwitnesses of planes
http://www.911disinformation.com/noplanes/NoPlanesCounterEvidence.html
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/09/no-planes-theory-rip.html












Looked more like a plane
Looked more like a plane than a blob.