There should be a campaign to have either Paul Thompson, Nafeez Ahmed, or the Jersey Girls to come on DN! and talk about all the evidence and unanswered questions brought up by the 9/11 truth movement.

There is no excuse not to have Paul Thompson on! Why did they choose the Loose Change guys? Obviously it was because they wanted young, hot-headed kids, not someone calm, older, and well-spoken, and harder to dismiss.

Amy has been on WBAI doing fund drives recently. I was thinking of offering a large pledge ($1000 or so) on the condition that she have Paul Thompson on her show. I can't really afford it, but it would still be worth it! Maybe we could chip in to get up a large chunk of money. And it's not like we're bribing her to have some fringe guy on--Paul Thompson's book is published by HarperCollins and he's been interviewed on network TV.

International Truth Movement
http://www.truthmove.org

show about 1.5 years ago, but there was no discussion of 9/11 whatsoever.

Get used to it. Just read Amy's body language, facial expressions, and verbal responses. She was quite uncomfortable while she was being interviewed and did not want to make any comments on it. I found it to be pretty weak just like the arguements from the one guy in the earlier video who claimed that there weren't any reliable sources on the matter. He shouldn't have commented at all since he wasn't familiar with people in the 9/11 movement as he later stated. He was responding to the question based off of emotion. This is what we're up against people. Emotions vs. logic. Same crap that was rampant during the Dark Ages.

"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)

the problem here is that the background noise is people talking , too, so it inhabits about the same frequency spectrum as the 'wanted meat'... is therefore not exactly easy to filter out.

It seems to me that it should be possible. I don't know if software is designed to do it yet, I would fully expect there to be. Humans can pick out specific conversations with others going on around them. It's called the cocktail party effect. If our brains can do it then so can computers. Just apply an ICA analysis to it.

"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)

"if our brains can do it then so can computers"

uuuh, where did you get this idea from?

but anyway, it is partly possible, you are right. there are more sophisticated methods than 'simple' filtering. That statement is very wrong tho, i have to insist on that:)
Im a programmer, btw.

Barrie will have a copy of all of my video (over an hour) from that night. I'm sure he can use his connections in the Biz, to fix the sound if its possible. Radical Pragmatist

I've never seen such interviewees so embarassed and uncomfortable. Obviously they just don't want to know.

The reason why? See chart below

http://www.leftgatekeepers.com/chart.htm

Maybe it was the ghosts of 3,000 innocent people who were murdered on 9/11!!!

There is something very, very wrong going on with this Goodman woman & her outrageous gatekeeping of 9/11 truth!!!

I couldn't believe all these learned lefties saying that we should focus on getting rid of Bush. Revealing that the Bush regime committed mass murder & high treason on 9/11 would certainly lead to Bush's demise & many other needed changes in the world!

Your're right, 9/11 truth can bring down the regime. But I wouldn't really call Amy and Dem now "left" at all. They cater to the prejudices of the liberal wing of the Democratic party, and 9/11 truth would be deeply disturbing to this loyal, Bush-hating/Dem voting people.
What's left? How about the World Socialist Web site, wsws.org, where they smelled something rotten about 9/11 very early on. Their analyses are always very powerful an on-target.

they(WSWS) did great work on the Wellstone assassination. they were one of the few, even alternative outlets to go near that one.

Amen!! Preach it! Out with the old in with the new! We need integrity in our institutions!

"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)

Well, the money/inteligence are certainly there. In any case, I am persuaded by the Ruppert argument that physical evidence is not where it's at ( I certainly do agree that the towers were brought down by CD).
Why? Because it's not enough to prove an inside job in some general way - which is what controlled demolitiion and other physical evidence does - but to follow the trail of evidence to the PERPETRATORS, people with last names. The polls show that a large section of the American people already think that there's something fishy with 9/11, so to hammer away at the inside job angle is necessary, but not enough. The Mineta testimony - all by itself, with no help from CD, money trails, live hijackers, WTC 7 or anything - should be enough to hurl someone into the fires of hell.