Government Knew Attacks could be INSIDE the U.S.
Richard Ben-Veniste said the following to Condoleezza Rice the following question during her appearance before the 9/11 Commission:
"The extraordinary high terrorist attack threat level in the summer of 2001 is well documented, and Richard Clarke's testimony about the possibility of an attack against the United States homeland was repeatedly discussed from May to August within the intelligence community, and that is well documented. You acknowledged that Richard Clarke told you that Al-Qaeda cells were in the United States.
The August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief was entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US".
The CIA Director had warned congress shortly before 9/11 "that there could be an attack, an imminent attack, on the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected" according to a broadcast on National Public Radio
Newsweek stated "On Sept. 10, NEWSWEEK has learned, a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns" (pay-per-view; cached version of article here)
An employee who worked in the south tower stated "How could they let this happen? They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we'd been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual. I think they had an inkling something was going on"
And a guard who worked in the world trade center stated that "officials had recently taken steps to secure the towers against aerial attacks"
According to MSNBC, "There have been a slew of reports over the past decade of plots to use planes to strike American targets".
For example, a 1998 report forwarded from the FBI to the Federal Aviation Administration concluded that "a group of unidentified Arabs planned to fly an explosive-laden plane . . . into the World Trade Center".
The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), the military air defense agency responsible for protecting the U.S. mainland, had run drills for several years of planes being used as weapons against the World Trade Center and other U.S. high-profile buildings, and "numerous types of civilian and military aircraft were used as mock hijacked aircraft". In other words, drills using REAL AIRCRAFT simulating terrorist attacks crashing jets into buildings, including the twin towers, were run.
And a pre-9/11 National Intelligence Estimate was entitled "Islamic Extremists Learn to Fly", and was apparently about Islamic people taking classes at U.S. flight schools.
So the administration's story that they thought the warnings in the months leading up to 9/11 had to do with U.S. interests outside of the U.S. is not credible.
- GeorgeWashington's blog
- Login to post comments
Did Condoleezza Rice and Ben-Veniste rehearse
I wonder if Condoleezza Rice and Ben-Veniste rehearsed their confrontation.
The net result is that they get to push the "Bin Laden did it " meme, while making it seem that there was tough questioning.
Bin Laden did not get NORAD to stand down.
Bin Laden did not plant the explosives in WTC 7.
Seems that it was too easy and convenient for Condi to give up the title of the PDB.
Why are so many in disbelief about the al-Qaeda threat?
Unless the truth movement wants to get laughed out of court some day, you need to quit disbelieving the real threat of Muslim fundamentalism. There is just as much evidence of Muslim involvement on 9/11, as there is of government inside involvement.
Why is this so hard to understand? In case you forgot, the government charted planes after 9/11 to fly members of the bin-Laden family out of the country. This same government also tried to turn over port authorities in America to a Dubai-owned company.
Do you remember Iran-Contra?
The Saudis have huge influence in this country, both politically and economically.
I'm not sure at what point LIHOP and MIHOP meet, in terms of truthful evidence that will stand up in a court of law, but that is what we should be trying to understand, instead of suggesting that Ben Veniste and Condi "rehearsed their confrontation."
the fact remains that 9/11
the fact remains that 9/11 could NOT have been done solely by "muslim fundamentalists". what is the purpose of the big lie of 9/11? thats easy, its the "war on terror". without the muslim patsies there would be no "war on terror". sure, muslim fundamentalism is real(though grossly overblown) but its also a tool. the primary culprits behind 9/11 are/were NOT muslims. muslims were mere patsies in that attack. the war on terror is a lie just like 9/11 is. i am MUCH more afraid of my own government than i am of some "al qaeda" patsy blowing me up. the "terror threat" needs to be exposed, not appeased. muslim involvement in 9/11? not really, only for cosmetic purposes.
Nobody denies the radical muslims involvement
The network created by western intelligence services is the real problem. During the afghan-soviet war western intelligence services, created and installed a system of radicalism and intelligence to support the collapse of the Soviet Union. The question you should have is: When did this cooperation and aide terminated? Did it continue till this day?
The evidence points that it still continues till this day. You have to go back in history and research on the similar systems of support to radical groups all over the globe and you will understand why it is not just Muslims, but the manipulation and deception of these Muslims is what really counts. Who manipulates and create all of these networks are the ones that have to face trial one day.
These systems of deception are not just created to support an ideology of a political empire, but the economic growth of globalize corporations for the empire, they (globalist companies) stand the most to gain from chaos. Lack and monopolies on resources = inflated prices for products that otherwise will be plenty and cheap. Diamonds and oil are just 2 examples.
Go figure why in the last decades there are so many armed insurrections trained and armed by Western services and proxies for these western agencies.
If Muslims are patsies, then why are they defeating us in Iraq?
If 9/11 were perfectly conceived by the neocons, with the help of Muslim patsies, as a sanction for war in Iraq and Afghanistan, then you would think the Muslim "patsies" over there would make sure the Western interests succeed in this current war for Iraq. But we are losing over there.
Are Western globalists funding the war to defeat the U.S. and Britain military? Is Rumsfeld working to defeat his own generals?
No doubt there has been Western funding and development of al-Qaeda over the years. Mostly through globalist groups, NWO think tanks, intelligence agencies and secret societies.
Command of the money sources, though, has been shifting away from the West and towards Middle Eastern globalists. The Saudi's, for instance, control incredible assets in the U.S., but they also fund radical Muslim fundamentalism. Go figure.
Islam, as a religion, has a domination world view They are taking over countries in Africa and imposing Islamic law on people, and killing people who do not comply. Sudan is an example.
America is an empire on the decline. We are a huge debtor nation. We are having less and less say in world politics.
There is a world war going on in which Muslims are showing greater strength. They are not mere patsies. They have their own agenda.
Right now, I'm curious to what extent competing interests and agendas may have been at work on 9/11. We just need to follow the evidence and credible witness trail.
The NWO seems to be fragmented. Various agents may work together on one project, then turn around and double cross their backers. It's called TREACHERY. Middle Eastern cultures are known for their treachery. Don't be surprised if the U.S. trained Iraqi Army marches on Israel some day.
What I don't like is when some people in the truth movement try to funnel all evidence into their view that everything that happened on 9/11 was a Cheney controlled inside job. The pre-9/11 evidence shows volumes of evidence showing there was indeed a Muslim controlled threat. You can discount some of it, but not all of it.
First order of busness: nothing ever does as planned.
Damn, now I've got Alan Parson's Project in my head.
It didn't go perfectly as planned; just good enough for, as the say, government work.
And Islam, as a religon, has no more a domination world view that Christianity. Get thee to a library and read--real books are best--about the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the witchhunts. In fact Christianity was used for centuries as an excuse to exterminate The First Nations and African slave trade. Yet most Christians don't belive any of this rubbish. You'll find the same is true of modern Muslims.
Basically, the Muslim threat, before and after 911, has only been a threat because US intelligence agencies and MI6 ensure they have the means, motive and opportunity to be a threat. I think you're confusing Iraqi insurgents, otherwise known as patriots, with the Muhadjadeem(excuse my spelling), who, yes, may be helping the insurgents out, but are a radical branch of Islam almost entirely created by the CIA.
Basically most of us focus on Cheney, et al. because if you can pull the funding plug, all the CIA groups will be dead in the water.
But thanks for keeping us on our toes. Questions are good.
Now I need a drink.
Patsies
:The pre-9/11 evidence shows volumes of evidence showing there was indeed a Muslim controlled threat."
I'm not sure I'm reading what you're trying to say here. There is in fact, quite a bit of evidence that suggests that Arabs were involved, who may have been Muslim but possibly not even practicing Muslims.
"Patsy" does not imply as you seem to infer that the person in question is weak or a pushover. It is kind of a "technical" term in this context, referring to individuals who occupy a certain place in a covert op. They are its public face, they are paraded around to make sure they leave a trail of witnesses, and so forth. In the case of 9/11, I am convinced that a group of Arab guys was used as patsies. I don't know what their actual role was, but they were definitely positioned to be the fall guys.
"Islam, as a religion, has a world domination view." Islam, in fact, is different in different cultural contexts. A blanket statement like that is easily read as bigotry. This is a really good time in history to get to know some Muslims personally and learn what THEY believe, as a counterpoint to the anti-Muslim propaganda we're being made to wallow in.
"beating us" implies we are competing to "win" and leave.
I think we can all agree that there is no intention of "winning", just getting comfortable there. We see 100 dead a day in Iraq and don't even think much about it.
If it was Oklahoma or Maine it'd be horrible?
Every day.
/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info
Richard Ben-Veniste hammers Rice
Watching Rice in this clip drives me spare. This is why we need a new investigation, with testimony under oath. Ben-Veniste does a good job, but he doesn't have the authority to arrest Rice for contempt when she doesn't answer the question.
The cow's good at her job--bullshitting--I give her that.
Proves we need a new independent investigation.
Just posted this at
Just posted this at Americablog...keep hitting hard at the high volume sites.
"Oh my god when the left gatekeepers grow some ouevos and tell the truth maybe then the obvious will come into focus. The WTC massacre was a Cheney quail hunt with 2,993 people that didn't hear "duck"."
Alcohol...it's what's for dinner.
Go Patriots!
Is this...
Part of the thing I sent you?
___________________________________
"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."
I totally revised and expanded the blog.
Jon, yeah thanks for the Ben-Veniste/Rice quotes!
georgewashington.blogspot.com.
Cool...
___________________________________
"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."
Just found this
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A8734-2002Jan19?language=printer
Nice little damage control
Nice little damage control piece... I wonder who really wrote it.
Ahh Barton Gellman - the WP National Security writer...
His History back through 1998
How can one cover that field and not KNOW the truth...
Taliban official warns of Ramazan attack on US
PESHAWAR: The head of the Islamabad-based Al-Quds Media Centre has received an audio message from a senior Taliban leader in which he asked Muslims living in the US to leave the country as soon as possible “because God’s punishment would fall on America in the month of Ramazan.”
Jamal Ismail, a senior journalist who once worked for Al-Jazeera television channel and is now head of the Al-Quds Media Centre, told The News that he received a phone call Thursday from Taliban leader Mulla Masoom Afghani. “Afghani said he was speaking from somewhere in Kandahar province. He read out the message in Arabic, which I recorded. In it he advised Muslim residents of America to get out to escape harm because the US could face big attacks in the month of Ramazan,” said Jamal Ismail.
According to Jamal Ismail, it was the first time that Afghani, who is head of the pro-Taliban clerics’ consultative council and the former ambassador of Afghanistan to Pakistan, had conveyed such a message. “Afghani didn’t say that it was a dream. It appeared that he strongly believed that America was going to face punishment at the hands of Allah,” he explained.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/print3.asp?id=3513
From what I gathered (from
From what I gathered (from google), Ramazan (or Ramadan) is sept. 24 to oct. 22, IOW we are in the middle of it. Fits with other indicators of a new false flag comming soon.