Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Proof of Government Whitewash

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.

The evidence that the government has covered up and whitewashed what really occurred on 9/11 is overwhelming.

For example, the former director of the FBI says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission.

And the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people (free subscription required).

Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only "the first draft" of history.

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ."

And former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up".

But let's back up and look at the 9/11 Commission in more detail. Preliminarily, President Bush and Vice-President Cheney took the rare step of personally requesting that congress limit all 9/11 investigation solely to "intelligence failures", so there has never been a congressional probe into any of the real issues involved.

The administration also opposed the creation of a 9/11 commission. Once it was forced, by pressure from widows of 9-11 victims, to allow a commission to be formed, the administration appointed as executive director an administration insider, whose area of expertise is the creation and maintenance of "public myths" thought to be true, even if not actually true (and see this article), starved the commission of funds, providing a fraction of the funds used to investigate Monica Lewinsky, failed to provide crucial documents (and see this article also), and refused to require high-level officials to testify under oath, and allowed Bush and Cheney to be questioned jointly.

More importantly, the 9-11 Commission refused to examine virtually any evidence which contradicted the administration's official version of events. As stated by the State Department's Coordinator for Counterterrorism, who was the point man for the U.S. government's international counterterrorism policy in the first term of the Bush administration, "there were things the [9/11] commission[s] wanted to know about and things they didn't want to know about."

For example, the 9-11 Commission report fails to mention the CIA director's urgent warnings to top administration officials in July 2001 of an impending attack (indeed, the 9-11 Commission was briefed on these warnings, but denied they knew about them until confronted with contrary evidence). Moreover, numerous veteran national security experts were turned away, ignored, or censored by the 9/11 commission, even though they had information directly relevant to the commission's investigation. And the 9/11 Commission Report does not even mention the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 or any explosions in the buildings (the word "explosion" does not appear in the report). There are literally hundreds of other examples of entire lines of evidence which contradict the government's account which were ignored by the Commission.

A very well-documented book by a distinguished professor shows that the 9-11 Commission was a whitewash. According to law professor Richard Falk of Princeton, the author of this book "establishes himself, alongside Seymour Hersh, as America's number one bearer of unpleasant, yet necessary, public truths" (Seymour Hersh, as you might know, is the Pulitzer prize-winning reporter who uncovered the Iraq prison torture scandal). See a synopsis of the book here; and a summary of a portion of the book here.

Indeed, the very 9-11 widows who had pressured the administration to create the 9/11 Commission now "question the veracity of the entire Commission’s report", and have previously declared it a failure which ignored 70% of their detailed questions and "suppressed important evidence and whistleblower testimony that challenged the official story on many fronts".

Moreover, a leading firefighters' trade publication called the investigation concerning the world trade center a "half-baked farce". In addition, the official investigators themselves were largely denied funding, access to the site and the evidence contained there, or even access to such basic information as the blueprints for the world trade center. Similarly, a professor of fire protection engineering, and the former chief of the fire science and engineering division of the agency now investigating the world trade center disaster, wrote that the world trade center buildings could not have collapsed due to jet fuel fires, that evidence was being destroyed, and that there was no real investigation into the collapses.

Indeed, the blueprints for the world trade center are apparently STILL being withheld from reporters and the public, and the government agency in charge of the investigation has grossly mischaracterized the structure of the buildings.

And the government agency tasked with examining the collapse of the World Trade Centers did NOT investigate any anomalies in the collapse of the buildings, failing to even examine any of the following evidence: the buildings’ impossible near free-fall speeds and symmetrical collapses; the unexplained fact that the core of the North Tower failed first; the apparent demolition squibs; the fact that the buildings turned to dust in mid-air; the presence of molten metal in the basement areas in large pools in all of the buildings; the unexplained presence of unusual compounds in the steel; the unexplained swiss-cheese like holes in the steel; and the unexplained straightening out of the upper 34 floors of the South Tower after they had precipitously leaned over and started toppling like a tree

Indeed, an article from a respected civil engineering trade journal states: 

"World Trade Center disaster investigators are refusing to show computer visualizations [i.e. models] of the collapse of the Twin Towers despite calls from leading structural and fire engineers".

The article goes on to state "a leading U.S. structural engineer said 'By comparison [to the modeling of fires] the global structural model is not as sophisticated' . . . The software used has been pushed to new limits, and there have been a lot of simplifications, extrapolations and judgement calls . . . it would be hard to produce a definitive visualization from the analysis so far.'” (free subscription required; copy posted here)(in other words, the government refused to release a visual model of the collapses, and even the non-visual computer models which the government used to examine why the trade centers collapsed are faulty).  

The same journal points out that "Some engineers . . . have accused NIST of repeatedly changing its explanation of the collapse mechanism." (Google's cached version of the article is here)

See also this question and answer exchange at a recent government press conference (skip to 1 minute and 23 seconds into the video).  And this short video on building 7 and the subsequent investigation (you may wish to disregard brief partisan portion).

And did you know that investigators for the Congressional Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House?

Or that a former FBI translator who Senators Leahy and Grassley, among others, have claimed is credible, and who the administration has gagged for years without any logical basis -- has stated that "this administration knowingly and intentionally let many directly or indirectly involved in that terrorist act [September 11th] go free – untouched and uninvestigated"?

Or have you heard that the FBI long ago found and analyzed the "black box" recorders from the airplanes which hit the Twin Towers, but has consistently denied that they were ever found? 

Or did you know that the tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building as shown by this NY Times article (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view) and by this article from the Chicago Sun-Times?

And amazingly, many years after the FBI stated it did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute Bin Laden for 9/11, that agency apparently still does not have hard evidence linking Bin Laden to the crime.

Still think the government really investigated and disclosed what happened on 9/11?

Indeed, there are even indications that false evidence may have been planted to deflect attention from the real perpetrators. 

digg this story

georgewashington.blogspot.com.

Good Work...

GW.
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Digg This Story!

Netscape

Someone posted on Netscape, also. You can vote for it here: http://politics.netscape.com/story/2006/10/06/proof-of-911-whitewash/

Utter nonsense, GW and Jon Gold

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Have you actually studied

Have you actually studied any film of the WTC demolitions recently?

Don't be ridiculous

Every rational person knows full well that there can be no films of something that never happened. We've waited for years for you to present evidence of explosives yet you can't come up with any.

Take the time to educate yourself on the necessity of presenting evidence for your claims. We aren't interrested in your pagan religious beliefs.

maybe next time you can use

maybe next time you can use your own words "Anonymous". it tends to strengthen your argument when you do more than simply cut and paste a whole article, and also, if you use a name instead of staying 'Anonymous" and taking shots. coward.

Maybe you could learn to read

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

did you write the column or

did you write the column or not? and get a name already ya fucking coward.

Or some name.

Hell, show some imagination. I'll give you some suggestions: Galacticus, The Joker, Gilligan.

I'll stop being petty when you(anonymous)stop being insulting.

Report - Select Committee on Assassinations - U.S. House of Rep.

http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/summary.htm...

and i quote,

"Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.

The Warren Commission failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President. This deficiency was attributable in part to the failure of the Commission to receive all the relevant information that was in the possession of other agencies and departments of the Government."

take your blinders off you ignorant ass.......or spend more time in a library and actually read.

Elevated Levels of Radium Found in Area of Fresh Kills

Steve Jones says

you need to know the actual LEVELS, or it is not very interesting. Also, could be from illegal dumpers at the landfill -- not necessarily 9/11.

georgewashington.blogspot.com.

Not Fresh Kills

The site listed in the article is Great Kills, not Fresh Kills. Great Kills is a park on the opposite side of Staten Island, not the place where they dumped WTC debris. No smoking gun here.

Ok, thank you guys for the

Ok, thank you guys for the clarifications.

thanks George

Thanks George.

I agree. It was an inside job. There has been a massive coverup of 911. And the news and facts of the coverup are written all over the public record.

I was just listening to the false flag radio progam with Dan Abramson and Kenneth Barrett.
They were talking about how the internet has become the new intelligence agency that is surpassing the existing ones. ie. the CIA, DIA,...
We have even more information than they do.
They said Ray McGovern had said that most of what these agencies get, they get from the public record.
And as you can see from GeorgeWashington's post he is acting as a member of the 911 truth intelligence agency.
We are the 911 truthers from the 911 TIA agency freeing this planet from the unjust overlords.
The CIA, DIA etc. are probably coming to this website to read these articles to get information THEY don't even know about.
And certainly some of these intelligent agents will start to turn in our direction when they see the full evidence.

Abramson was talking about how he gets web hits from Raytheon, Military contracting companies etc on his website. He can tell from the web logs. And that probably they are coming to get info that they are not even aware of.

We are witnessing on this website and in response to 911 a new consciousness for man, near real time news of what is really occurring on this planet.

As the printing press was to the written book,so now is the internet to the printing press.

The internet is the greatest invention of man.
It is our salvation.

Go 911 TIA ers !!

Take off your pinkish glasses, please

Anonymous,

sorry to spill your pink beans.... but the battle for control over the Internet has hardly even started.

Yes, the Internet has helped us reveal a few big scandals. But look closely: what is the content of the most popular websites (YouTube, MySpace, Yahoo, videos@google, what-have-you....)?

We have our little corner of the Big Net -- just as we have some "independent" little print publications against the MainStream Media.

You seem to glorify the Internet too much. If we are not vigilant, or if we are too weak, even our little corners will all be taken over in a few years. Already now, 70% of net traffic is p0rn and other commercial stuff.... So even if we can win the battle against fascist takeover in USA and elsewhere, the Internet as we know it will be in danger even if we keep a (relatively) "democratic" capitalism.

Another superb piece from

Another superb piece from GW as we have come to expect.

In response to Little Pipe. the net has been hugely important in the early stages of our movement; indeed it could not have happened without it, given the craven nature of 95% of the news media, but the future may be less rosy. In the worst case scenario, when free speech is denied us on the electronic media, we must prepare to fall back on more traditional means of propaganda such as good old-fashioned leafletting and public meetings. It will be hard , but remember Solidarity in Poland in the early '80s. Or was that funded by the US?

Imagine that. A cover up?

Imagine that. A cover up?

BTW, is anyone considering a

BTW, is anyone considering a book about his "memoirs" of being in the truth movement. It might turn to gold when 9/11 truth takes effect.

The Truth about the War on Terror

The Truth about the War on Terror

http://www7.zapto.org/war.html

Outstanding effort.

'Nuff said.

Regards,

gangster