9/11 Perp Omar Sheikh was an MI6 Agent
GeorgeWashington Fri, 09/29/2006 - 4:25pm
Pakistani president Musharraf allegedly said today that Omar Sheikh was an MI6 (British intelligence services) agent. The article covering Musharraf's statement says "At some point, he probably became a rogue or double agent."
This is interesting, because Mr. Sheikh is claimed to be one of the masterminds, trainers and/or funders of 9/11.
Did Mr. Sheikh in fact become a rogue or double agent? Or was he still working for MI6 when he played his role in the 9/11 attacks?
- Login to post comments
This is muddy
So Musharraf shows up to promote his new book, meet with Bush, and John Steward, and then drop a bomb on the 'official story'? I doubt it. Could this be just more limited hangout? How independent can the Pakistani president really be when he admits that he was bullied by the U.S. into participating in the War on Terror. Score one for Donald Rumsfeld and his Office of Stratigic Information? Omar Sheikh has always been the focus of a great deal of disinformation.
Let's see if Bush or Blair have any comment. Maybe this is an attempt to throw some of the blame at outgoing priminister Tony Blair. At this point, its really hard to tell.
Certainly an interesting twist to the tale.
International Truth Movement
http://www.truthmove.org
holy sh*t!
The 537-page book describes tensions among senior officials from the very beginning of the administration. Mr. Woodward writes that in the weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks, Mr. Tenet believed that Mr. Rumsfeld was impeding the effort to develop a coherent strategy to capture or kill Osama bin Laden. Mr. Rumsfeld questioned the electronic signals from terrorism suspects that the National Security Agency had been intercepting, wondering whether they might be part of an elaborate deception plan by Al Qaeda.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/29/washington/29account.html?ex=116019360...
gee, i wonder why Rummy would do that?
NY Times does something brave.
for once. this editorial is actually quite good.
Rushing Off a Cliff
NY Times | September 29 2006
Here’s what happens when this irresponsible Congress railroads a profoundly important bill to serve the mindless politics of a midterm election: The Bush administration uses Republicans’ fear of losing their majority to push through ghastly ideas about antiterrorism that will make American troops less safe and do lasting damage to our 217-year-old nation of laws — while actually doing nothing to protect the nation from terrorists. Democrats betray their principles to avoid last-minute attack ads. Our democracy is the big loser.
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/September2006/290906_b_Rushing.htm
Nimmo does it again.
Detainee Bill and the Dawning of a Fascist America
Kurt Nimmo | September 29 2006
As Steve Douglas notes, “the Schmittian drives for the arrogation of all power into the hands of a ‘unitary executive’ Presidential dictatorship,” in the case of both Hitler and Bush, are “essentially, identical.”
In the wake of the Reichstag fire in early 1933, blamed on the Comintern, Hitler and the Nazis, with “the support of a terrified populace … suspended civil rights and civil liberties, fattened their war machine and rode the fascist tide into a full-blown dictatorship,” writes Harvey Wasserman.
After the Reichstag fire, Paul von Hindenburg signed the fateful emergency decree, thus providing Hitler’s SA and SS with the legality required to round up the opposition and throw them in makeshift concentration camps run by local Gauleiters and SA leaders. “The rest, as they say, is history,” notes Wasserman.
Bush, or rather his neocons, who subscribe to the Schmittian drive “for the arrogation of all power into the hands of a ‘unitary executive’ Presidential dictatorship,” have their own gesetzvertretende Verordnungen or “law-substituting decrees,” or rather Constitution-substituting decrees, in particular scrubbing the Fourteenth Amendment.
http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=580
MI6 like Bin Laden was
MI6 like Bin Laden was CIA... an EXPENDABLE patsie.
Bush, The Gay Blade
http://cloakanddagger.de/CLOAKANDDAGGER.DE_TOM%20HENEGHAN/cloakanddagger...
Interesting read
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&add...
Saed Sheikh - Omar Sheikh
I think it would be helpful to use
Saeed Sheikh here's why [Amed Omar Saeed Sheik]:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_ti...
not to be confused with Sheikh Omar:
Search Omar Sheikh leads to someone else on cooperativeresearch.
But that is no doubt an interesting character.
Maybe it would be even better to find out what names in these paternal names are commonly abbreviated.
Beware of Trojan Horses
How convenient!
I can see that this could turn into what I had envisioned some time back.
With all the heat from the "controlled demolitions" theorists, BushCo needs an out!
My prediction is that soon, they will admit the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition and blame the Arabs for planting the bombs that did it.
ive been saying that all
ive been saying that all along, and you'll notice they have been pushing the "al qaeda had a mole" angle lately in the MSM as well. its still gonna be tough for them to explain how bombs were planted in building 7.