Popular Mechanics is so full shit that it's disgusting.

______________
Stop giving attention to the "no plane theory" disinfo agents like Nico Haupt, Morgan Reynolds, Shayler, killtown, CB_Brooklyn, webfairy, Holmgren, and others who are sabotaging this movement, either by sheer stupidity or intentionally.

Re-classify the PM Book as fiction which is the only way you can sell. The publisher should do a children's story hour sometime . . . . I still wouldn't watch (don't want to hurt my TV). Until each and every scientific issue is addressed, until every single frame of Pentagon video is released - stay the course!

A few other screen names to add to the signature.

Peggy Carter
brianv
ewing <-- Nico. But worth the mention so there's no confusion that they are the same person.

This is THE most fair and balanced coverage of the 9/11 myth to date!!! It also happens to contain THE ONLY real footage of the collapse of WTC Building 7, EVER! That kind of footage is simply never shown, and for very good reason. I made up a list of the mainstream media's MO in terms of covering 9/11 skepticism, and the omission of WTC 7 is point #1. Please check it out here and make sure you comment on it- http://www.911blogger.com/node/2672

Also, the way the piece was shot, the skeptics were essentially put on the same ground as the official shills and storytellers. Has anyone else even come close to NOT launching at least one ad hominem attack on the skeptics portrayed in their story? I'd give credit to the anchor, Evan Solomon, more than anyone else for this kind of coverage. And I'd certainly thank George Stroumboulopoulos for having Dylan Avery on his show in the first place a few months ago, in another fairly balanced piece- sans footage of WTC 7, of course. It's Dylan's appearance on The Hour which made this all possible, IMHO.

Lastly, David Ray Griffin, who's been perennially absent from the MSM airwaves- and again, for good reason- was included in this coverage. He could have been more effectively used, true, but just his presence adds credibility to the 9/11 Truth Movement. Call it the "grey hair factor", if you will.

FYI, according to the polling statistics, the higher up in age that someone is, the more likely they are to buy into the official myth. If one of their peers, such as Griffin, is present to argue the case against that myth, they're much more likely to question it. Otherwise all you get is a mumbled response of, "Fucking kid wacko...", before they change the channel.

Everyone should contact Evan Solomon and the CBC, praising them for showing the collapse of WTC 7 and letting them know that no MSM outlet has ever showed it before now. They may not be aware of that fact. And, of course, please tell them they did a spectacular job with their coverage. ;)

My only wish is that this piece is broadcast again and again over the coming months, and even years, instead of being only a one-time event. Again, CBC, Evan Solomon and everyone else at CBC News: Sunday who put this thing together, get the most heartfelt thanks that I can possibly muster!
_______________
http://tinyurl.com/q9wdl A must-see for the uninitiated: this video will awaken them from their long slumber
http://tinyurl.com/s8rrp A must-read for believers of the official story: David Ray Griffin administers the red pill

I wasn't aware that The Hour had covered 9/11 previously - thanks for pointing that out. Also, CBC aired two original 9/11 documentaries yesterday evening (Sep. 10), called "The Secret History of 9/11" and "9/11: Toxic Legacy". I didn't catch either of these, but from what I saw in the promotions the former looked like official story crap while the latter looked potentially informative. Did anyone watch these?

Related: The CBC show The Fifth Estate broadcasted an investigative piece titled "Conspiracy Theories" on Oct. 29, 2003. Also, more loosely related to 9/11, they aired an episode called "The Unauthorized Biography of Dick Cheney" on Oct. 6, 2004.

I am a regular viewer of the CBC National News, and unfortunately I've never heard anything come out of Peter Mansbridge's mouth questioning the official 9/11 narrative... Correct me if I'm wrong. A debate of the issues during prime-time would be enough to convince me that the CBC really wants to get the truth out in the open.

I think they may well have swapped airliners for drones because it seems far less risky for them to have had carefully modified drones, fully under their control, hit the towers. Much more could've gone wrong with a commercial airliner with real pilots, crew, passengers inside. (For example, what if the airliner made a crash landing somewhere & some people survived? They could've revealed many facts of the inside job. Also, what if pilot, crew, passengers actually got out some real radio or air-phone calls?) All these problems & more are avoided by having drones fly up from nearby air bases.

seems the most likely scenario for several reasons:

-The Northwoods documents
-The unusually low occupancy of the flights (1/4th?!)
-The flight paths, every single of which went out of their way to approach military airfields
-Increased control over drones compared to patsies
-The backgrounds of the passengers (Military Industrial Complex types, mostly)
-The apparent lack of "victims" relatives. There's Olson...and?

They didn't switch planes. Those people are dead. If they switched planes, then you really do get into this "leak implausability." This is garbage. It's a punchline to a 911 truther joke. We don't need this garbage. There is enough evidence without this stuff that could be. It's fun to say what could be, but msm grabs this stuff and presents it like it's all we are trying to say. Think about someone else saying what you present to try to make us look stupid before you repeat it. It's part of responisbility to the truth.

It's very possible that someone are trying to pull the rug under the Bush admin. OTOH, it is very unlikely that the masterminds behind the attacks would go ahead without a contingency plan for the eventuality of the truth comming out. Perhaps they can still manage to wrestle Bush & co out of it. And even IF they are pulling the rug, you can bet that the real people in power will remain untouched.

Therefore it is important that we keep spreading the truth OURSELVES, no matter how much "help" we get elsewhere. Don't let them set the agenda.

"NIST is also considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse [of World Trade Center #7 on 9/11]."

Funny how Lee Hamilton "can't recall" whether or not WTC7 was included in the Commission Report. And "if" it wasn't his weak ass presumptions on why it may not have been included.

Then Meigs jumping in with "the conspiracy theorist" jumping on this as damining evidence of a coverup.

YA THINK!?!?! God I hope Dylan rips these guys a new one on Amy Goodman tomorrow. Is that still on?

Although all your other points are sound, your one about the seismic spikes was debunked long ago. Please see a detailed analysis here by fellow skeptics- http://www.911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
_______________
http://tinyurl.com/q9wdl A must-see for the uninitiated: this video will awaken them from their long slumber
http://tinyurl.com/s8rrp A must-read for believers of the official story: David Ray Griffin administers the red pill

I am a no "fake" planer...I fully believe Flights 11, 175 and 77 hit their target. I do not believe the swapped planes thing has any validity. First off we have personal items people on those planes had, that were found.
We have the fact no US government official could be "compartmentalized" to take passengers off a plane and gas em, then send up fake planes. Sorry, this isnt 1962 with General Lemnitzer on board, these are calculated guys who know the crazier the plot the bigger the risk.

These so-called arab pilots could NOT of hit there targets with that type of
precision, some of the high-jackers minus the others popping up alive
in Saudia Arabia did'nt have that kind of commercial skill, they were
obviously flown into the towers via remote control.

Why people believe these flights were just wondering across states
without any ground support and just hit ALL there targets with bulls
eye precision is beyond people with simple common sense.

Why the destruciton of Bldg 7, obviously a temporary control center.