Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Blogads

Loose Change: An American Coup DVD

User login

RSS Feeds

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox


Let's Play "My Theory Is Better Than Yours"

( Home » blogs » Jon Gold's blog » Let's Play... )
Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
Submitted by Jon Gold on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 9:20pm.

It's sweeping the 9/11 Truth Movement by storm.

Here are the rules.

1) Spend as much time as you can arguing with people who didn't murder 3000 people, and accomplish nothing else.

Oops, there are no more rules. They already won.

» login to post comments | 0 points

we've seen this happen on

we've seen this happen on this site in the past on other subjects as well.. eventually they die out and people just learn to disagree with one another..

we can't allow any given inner-arguement to ruin this site though, so something is going to have to give.. people who can't just get along, or feel the need to divert everything into a given subject are going to have to chill a bit..

bah.

Submitted by dz on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 9:23pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

You're...

Not doing a damn thing wrong. One could argue banning individuals with crazy theories is the answer. Where does it end?

Asking to focus on more activism than arguing is a just request I think.

You can either do it, or not. We're not children here. We're supposed to be adults, and this is NOT a game.

___________________________________

"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

Submitted by Jon Gold on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 9:39pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

I dunno, Jon. I personally

I dunno, Jon. I personally believe that the same bastards that did 9/11 are the same bastards who are putting out some of these so-called 9/11 theories. And I don't see anything wrong with exposing that.

Submitted by stallion4 on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 9:24pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Ok...

Instead of 99% exposing and 1% activism... let's try 1% exposing and 99% activism. ;)

___________________________________

"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

Submitted by Jon Gold on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 9:29pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

No I disagree. I think we

No I disagree. I think we should clean out own house before trying to clean someone elses. Don't get me wrong. I think both can be achieved at the same time. Maybe 90% activism 10% exposing, which is a form of activism.

So 100% activisim ;)

Submitted by stallion4 on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 9:57pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

My theory brings all the boys to the yard. And they're like...

you're a fucking idiot if you can't agree with me.
No, you're a fucking idiot provide some evidence.
Why don't you shut up and go away until you disprove that thing that I'm not even trying to prove.
Shut up you theory hugger.

...

Or something like that. Sorry, couldn't resist.

Submitted by BCS on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 9:30pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Well said.

Well said Jon.

Submitted by justanidea on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 10:01pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Jon, I agree with your post 100%

so I've decided not to waste time responding to all the idiots who can't understand what's right in front of their blindfolded eyes. I already posted messages encouraging people to not get distracted by what they cannot understand. If people in the movement do not understand that aluminum is not going to glide through structural steel and concrete like it glides through the air, then they should concentrate on other issues. Since Tv fakery is based on science, there should be NO PROBLEM discussing it here. There is a problem though.... all the assholes breaking the rules by posting insults. Those idiots need to go.

TV Fakery is by no means going away. More and more people will start speaking up about it, as David Shayler has proved. But I disagree with him though... it is NOT a waste of time. THIS is what the government does not want to become publicized. Therefore, THIS is what needs to be discussed. IT IS BACKED BY SCIENCE! This whole country has been dumbed down and you know it!

Any video of bombs in Iraq could be fake! DON'T YOU GET IT?

If people in the truth movement have too much pride to admit they're wrong, well, screw them. I learned to swallow my pride after realizing I've been promoting a hoaxer, aka Steven Jones.

But you know something?? It's true that people do need time to sort through it all in their own minds. Not only boxcutter believers, but planehuggers as well.

Submitted by CB_Brooklyn on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 10:02pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Did I Specify...

Any particular theory? Feeling guilty about something?

___________________________________

"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

Submitted by Jon Gold on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 10:07pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

I dunno...

but I do have a habit of overdoing things sometimes :) Hopefully this one was for the good

Submitted by CB_Brooklyn on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 10:14pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

I'll add that I do find

this very encouraging

Submitted by CB_Brooklyn on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 10:15pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

the idiots who can't

the idiots who can't understand what's right in front of their blindfolded eyes.

this type of stuff isn't very productive.. there are those who disagree with you, but that doesn't mean they are idiots.. these types of subtle comments just continue the arguement, because you are making the assertion that anyone who disagrees with you is a blind idiot..

just trying to help, i would love for the site to tone down a bit on all the hateful comments.. and that by no means is directed just at you.

Submitted by dz on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 10:18pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

dz, please ban these no

dz, please ban these no plane-hologram-tv fakery flakes once and for all. They are making a mockery of this website and the entire 9/11 truth movement. And they've no doubt ramped up their efforts in blogging about their "theory" because of the 5th anniversary coming up and the high number of new visitors to this site. IMO they are doing this on purpose to turn new people away and to give ammunition to the enemy to use against us. If you won't ban them then please limit the amount of times someone can blog about a particular 9/11 issue. Because every time I click on this website, the no plane-hologram-tv fakery nonsense is at the top of the blogs. Sometimes there are as many as 4 blogs about it in the "most recent blog" list. There's no theory about 9/11 that deserves that much attention -period. Especially one claiming there were no freaking planes at the WTC! WTF?!

Submitted by stallion4 on Fri, 09/08/2006 - 3:43am.
» login to post comments | 0 points

We've observed that you play

We've observed that you play this game often. And lose. No need to promote the idea.

Submitted by THE SHADOW KNOWS (not verified) on Thu, 09/07/2006 - 10:21pm.