Oregon artists take 9/11 Truth to Mexico

The Fall '01

Agnieszka Laska collaborates with Luis Arreguin in the choreodrama premiere THE FALL '01 at Museo de la Ciudad, Queretaro, Mexico.

The multimedia work for dancers and actors, brings to the performance stage a compelling story from which we can no longer hide. Jackie T. Gabel's score is now married to (local music video wizard) Uehara Takfumi's image montages into a three-quarter-hour-long choreodrama polemic, around the seemingly endless (now 3+years and running) Orwellian Peak Oil War of Terror (your tax dollars at work and soon to be virtually worthless), launched to solidify the regime's desperate imperialist grasping - not for the faint of heart and long past time for singing in the dark.

THE FALL '01 is a study in human debasement and expansive lamentation on a great society whose deteriorating values may well presage an empire at the precipice of its fall.

info. phone = 503.715.1866
www.URL = www.a-laska.com
email = a.laska@comcast.net

Rudy's Grand Illusion

http://villagevoice.com/news/0635,barrett,74322,6.html

What Giuliani likes to remember about 9-11—and what he actually did (or didn't do)

Breaking on RawStory..

Fed agency releases 9/11 conspiracy 'rebuttal:' Developing...

Federal agency releases

Federal agency releases 'rebuttal' to 9/11 theories on the destruction of WTC towers

In the face of polls which suggest that many Americans are skeptical about the government's official version of what happened on September 11, 2001, a federal agency has released a "rebuttal" to some prevalent "conspiracy theories" about the destruction of the World Trade Center towers

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Federal_agency_releases_911_conspiracy...

Revealed: President Clinton Responsible for 9/11..

ABC will air a “docudrama” next weekend called “The Path to 9/11″ which blames President Clinton for the 9/11 attacks while praising President Bush.

The writer of the movie is an unabashed conservative named Cyrus Nowrasteh. Last year, Nowrasteh spoke on a panel titled, “Rebels With a Cause: How Conservatives Can Lead Hollywood’s Next Paradigm Shift.” He has described Michael Moore as “an out of control socialist weasel,” and conducted interviews with right-wing websites like FrontPageMag.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/01/nowrasteh-conservative-activist/

---

Somehow this doesn't surprise me..

Hoffman replied to the NIST

Hoffman replied to the NIST F.A.Q

Here's the link:

Here's the link: http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/nist/WTC_FAQ_reply.html

"4. Weren't the puffs of smoke that were seen, as the collapse of each WTC tower starts, evidence of controlled demolition explosions?

No. As stated in Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, the falling mass of the building compressed the air ahead of it—much like the action of a piston—forcing smoke and debris out the windows as the stories below failed sequentially"

The piston theory that NIST advances here implies acceptance of the floor pancaking scenario, since the dust jets emerge from parts of the tower whose perimeter walls are still intact. Thus NIST contradicts its own theory, which explicitly rejects the floor pancaking scenario.

News editor at The Watchman Report, www.watchmanreport.com, delivering 9/11 truth to the Christian community

Fuck ABC

New ABC Docudrama Blames Clinton For 9/11, Praises Bush
On September 10 and 11, ABC will air a “docudrama” called “The Path to 9/11.” It was written by Cyrus Nowrasteh, who describes himself as “more of a libertarian than a strict conservative,” and is giving interviews to hard-right sites like FrontPageMag to promote the film.

What will it say about President Clinton? Here’s Rush Limbaugh with a preview:

A friend of mine [Cyrus Nowrasteh] out in California has produced and filmed — I think it’s a two-part mini-series on 9/11 that ABC is going to run in prime-time over two nights, close to or on 9/11. It’s sort of surprising that ABC’s picked it up, to me. I’ve had a lot of people tell me about it, my friends told me about it…And from what I have been told, the film really zeros in on the shortcomings of the Clinton administration in doing anything about militant Islamofascism or terrorism during its administration. It cites failures of Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright and Sandy Burglar.

How does it deal with President Bush? Salon has a review:

Condoleezza Rice gets that fated memo about planes flying into buildings, and makes it very clear to anyone who’ll listen just how concerned President Bush is about these terrorist threats — despite the fact that we’re given little concrete evidence of the president’s concern or interest in taking action. Maybe my memory fails me, but the only person I remember talking about Osama bin Laden back in 1998 was President Clinton, while the current anti-terrorist stalwarts worked the country into a frenzy over what? Blow jobs. In the end, “The Path to 9/11″ feels like an excruciatingly long, winding and deceptive path, indeed.

Bill Clinton, the perpetual whipping-boy!

NeoCons in trouble! They just bring out the old whipping-boy, Bill Clinton!

Where was Billy the Whipping Boy during OKC Bombing?

Oh yeah... in the White House! Apparently not watching the local news in OK that mentioned unexploded devices that were found and defused inside the building. Truck bomb? Sure. AND sophisticated professional quality explosives that failed to go off. Bill... did you lie to us about hat AND the blow jobs? I think you did. What else? Your pardon of Marc Rich at the end of your term and the reasons for it? Bill...? Is there something you want to confess before we have to drag it out of you again? Know anything about the '93 bombing of the WTC that you'd like to share Bill? Bill? George? Dick? Rudy? Bueller? Anyone?

_

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

Brit TV Film Depicts Bush

Brit TV Film Depicts Bush Slaying
Aug 31, 5:40 PM EST

The Associated Press

LONDON -- A British television network plans to broadcast a dramatic, documentary-style film about a fictional assassination of U.S. President George W. Bush, the network's head said Thursday.

The program uses actors and digital manipulation of real footage to show a fictional account of Bush being gunned down after delivering a speech in Chicago, Peter Dale, the head of More4, told a news conference.

http://tv.msn.com/tv/article.aspx?news=232368&GT1=7703

the power of myth and art and truth

I've been lurking for a few months while skeptically checking all sides out of the 9/11 issues raised here and around the net. What attracked me initially to these issues was the viral draw of the net and the drama which it wasd unfolding before me. I'm a media artist with an advanced degree, but not too geekey/scientific/technical and alot of what goes downn does hing on that sort of proof, it seems to me.

But one thing that poped out at me (and stuck) was the fact that when Philip Zelikow makes multiple statements about 9/11 in this speech, he refers to it as the "9/11 story". Yes STORY! -- Not event, not tragedy, but STORY.

Check out:
http://www.researchchannel.org/prog/displayevent.asp?rid=2371

Who talks this way?!!

Who thinks this way??!!

madness....................

twinkle, i suggest you take

twinkle, i suggest you take a look at Zelikows jobs in the past:

Prof. Zelikow's area of academic expertise is the creation and maintenance of, in his words, “public myths” or “public presumptions,” which he defines as “beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community." In his academic work and elsewhere he has taken a special interest in what he has called “‘searing’ or ‘molding’ events [that] take on ‘transcendent’ importance and, therefore, retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_D._Zelikow

cant make this stuff up.

In the November-December 1998 issue of Foreign Affairs, he co-authored an article entitled “Catastrophic Terrorism,” in which he speculated that if the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center had succeeded, “the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force. More violence could follow, either future terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks. Belatedly, Americans would judge their leaders negligent for not addressing terrorism more urgently.”

Philip Zelikow served on President Bush's transition team in 2000-2001. After George W. Bush took office, Zelikow was named to a position on the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, and worked on other task forces and commissions as well, including the National Commission on Federal Election Reform.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_D._Zelikow

doesn't it make you shake your head?

They have gotten away with this for so long, when some of this stuff is so obvious? 'a new pearl harbor' a guy who studies political myths and talked pre-9/11 about terms like 'pre-9/11' having to do with something AT the World Trade Center, no less, directing the investigation into 9/11.

News editor at The Watchman Report, www.watchmanreport.com, delivering 9/11 truth to the Christian community

i know Micahyah, its

i know Micahyah, its maddening that people cant put 2 and 2 together. of course the Cheney crime syndicate picked Zelikow to head/shape the Commission. just look at the guys resume. its INFURIATING how obvious some of this shit is........

cant make this stuff up--Yup, endless circumstantial evidenence

Yup, the circumstantial evidenence against Zelikow & the other neocons is endless!

that would almost be a

that would almost be a "witty" repsonse coward "Anonymous", if you had the guts to use a name. almost. whats worse, questioning the obvious suspect motives of individuals like Zelikow(just read his resume you fucking moron), or blindly trusting someone like him?

Zelikow

All I have to say is this guy is creepy. I watched a little bit of that video and I can imagine 50 years from now people studying this era and looking at people like Zelikow the same way we currently look at people like Hermann Goering.

creepy as hell

because he plays up to this image of an earnest boy scout type with his clean-cut looks. i saw him live once and in a Q&A the first question was about the business opportunities given the new terror paradigm--it was all downhill from there with more sycophants getting up to lick his balls. T-Bone you are right on the mark.

_

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

Assassination of Bush would be an injustice

I say that with no irony. Other than murder being wrong and never justified, Bush's real punishment must be public humiliation by way of a trial that exposes all of his crimes--not a heroic death at the hands of a madman. What a stupid idea for a "docudrama". Why, some might even say that if this thing actually airs, and then Bush is "apparently assassinated" it could be used to sow confusion as to whether he was indeed dead or like Ken Lay conveniently dead to justice. With so much confusion about reality among so many in this country, do we really want to play around with things like this? Can we instead return to boring old sanity and trials, and jail time?

_

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

Dr. Griffin's Interview On Hannity & Colmes...

Has been cancelled because of the hurricane. At least according to Dr. Griffin.

"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

pure fear.

pure fear.

Leo Strauss Noble Lie: The Neo-Cons Con Game

Thanks for the information. Amazingly shamefull. Where is the Colbert Report on this?!?

This info seems to lock into the basic neocon con game as cooked up by their guru Leo Strauss and his ideal of the "Noble Lie".

Noble Truth time it is!

Scope out Danny Postel, “Noble lies and perpetual war: Leo Strauss, the neo-cons, and Iraq,”
www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article-2-95-1542.jsp

Rage on!

America going the way of Rome...

Jon, your Gandhi quote is wonderful. Especially when we've got a maniac for U.S. President that says he's got to "catapult the propaganda". America is really going the way of Rome and appears to be dying a slow death.

Fasten Your Seat Belts

Don't You Mean...

This?

"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

Don't You Mean...

This?

"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

No

Of course not. We mean the truth about 9/11/

Still drawing false conclusions

And NOVA will explain that.....

Using vivid computer animations, NOVA takes viewers through a simulation of what the buildings endured in the 9/11 attacks. It turns out that fireproofing on the floor trusses was blown off by the impact of the jets, exposing the trusses to severe fire temperature. This caused the trusses to bow and eventually break the buildings' supporting columns, which then triggered the immediate collapse of the buildings. (See an audio slide show narrated by the chief NIST investigator.)

wow. "vivid computer

wow. "vivid computer animations" huh? that MUST mean its true.......

Wow!

Must mean you can refute it, huh?

Triggered the immediate collapse

I'll say ... a trigger and an immediate collapse...

And?

You are welcome to refute NIST. Nobody has yet.

Trusses broke? Why did the towers erupt, explode, & spew dust?

You're telling us that enormous office buildings erupted, exploded, created volcanic-like dust, fell at near free-fall speed, etc., because Trusses broke? Bullshit!

More wow!

Wow, you're telling us that tons of explosives were snuck in under thousands of people's noses?

You're welcome to refute hundreds of strucutral engineers. Just can't figure out why you won't.

Tons of explosives?

Don't think you would need tons of RDX, no. And snuck in under whose noses? A bunch of zombified office workers trained to avoid eye contact with anyone in a service uniform carrying heavy things? What, they would immediately think on seeing an elevator repairman "Hmmmm... I wonder if that guy is actually lacing my building's core columns with explosives to make it collapse after it is hit by allegedly hijacked aircraft? Nahhhh... but hell, I'll report my suspicions anyway and hope that, if they are well-founded, someone in charge, like the building's new owner Mr. Silverstein, os the new President's cousin Wirt Walker's security company that he hired will spring into action. Safety first, after all--and the elevator repair guy I saw go up into the elevator shaft was speaking with an accent, too--and you know how foreigners are--but then again, this is liberal New York--I better keep quiet lest people think I'm a racist, which I'm so not."

Yeah, something like that. RIGHT under their noses.

Anonymous, why do you hate America?

_

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

Will Nova explain how, you know, Silverstein likes to "pull-it"?

Oooohhhh, will there be an animation of Mr. Silverstein "pulling-it"? Maybe the trusses holding old Larry's hernias failed too?

Way too many little folds and wrinkles in that to animate...

Just imagine the number of polygons needed to model just the man's enormous BALLS. No, the towers were simple to model because as EVERYONE KNOWS who read the commission report, they were basically hollow tubes with nothing but elevator shafts up the middle.

People need to remember one thing about the NIST report--they simply claim with no evidence WHATSOEVER that a collapse would initiate, and leave it to us to assume that the collapse they are talking about would look JUST LIKE what we saw. Except that they can't prove it because their computer simulations looked nothing like the collapses observed, otherwise they wouldn't have refused to show them to us.

_

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

Try to catch up on reality

Can the NIST explain the

Can the NIST explain the steel girders and beams ,weighting thousands of pounds,that were ejected horizontally from the buildings? What about the molten metal in the basements of all three buildings/ It takes 5000 F to turn metal into liquid, where did that heat come from? What plane "knocked the fire proofing off" building 7? What happened to the 47 massive steel columns,why weren't any of them at least partially standing? Why was the concrete pulverized?Collapsing is one thing,desentagrating is another.What does the NIST have to say about the local news footage- ignored by the national media- of all those witnesses-firemen ,police,reporters,office workers,hearing multiple explosionsin the buildings?It would be nice if someone could explain why forensic evidence-the WTC steel- was so quickly and illegaly removed.

Your questions have been addressed

and shown to be silly.

Remember, those here ignore the evidence form those firemen who warned that WTC 7 was going to collapse on the basis of their assessemnt of the damage.

Why do you think those here don't want to acknowedge that fact.

Learn the truth about 9/11:

The Real Truth About 9/11 - Tuesday, Sept 5, 8:00 pm

Good Science and 9-11 Demolition Theories

WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory

The End of The "Controlled Demolition" Theory