It it just me, or are 9/11 truth articles increasing in number. I find it hard to keep up these days. I remember someone posted a statistic from Google News, anyone have a link?

Btw, some articles:

Reuters:Academic under fire for 9/11 conspiracy theory

5 years later, 9/11 skeptics feel they’re close to truth

9/11 and Iraq war spur illogical rhetoric near, far

Another 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist, Another Double Standard

I hate how they use "conspiracy theories".

The only conspiracy theory I can imagine is the official fairytale. You know the one with box-cutters and hijackers and the like.

A man in a cave....hahahahaha

Allegation: That Air Force fighter jets did not intercept the hijacked planes, even after one crashed into the WTC, is proof the military let the attacks happen.

Rebuttal: The 9/11 hijackers turned off their planes' transponders, making them very difficult to track. Also, the military had almost no experience or readiness to intercept planes flying over the United States.

umm....."no experience or readiness to intercept planes flying over the United States."?!

Rebuttal: The kind of explosives needed to collapse the Twin Towers would have weighed thousands of pounds each and required forklifts to move around. They could not have been secretly hidden in the buildings.

Basically their argument goes like this:
To knock down the towers would have taken TOO MUCH explosives, therefore you should believe that the towers fell without ANY explosives.

This argument defies logic. To the debunkers it's either "thousands of pounds requiring forklifts" or "absolutely nothing". No middle ground. And no, you don't need to see the evidence, even though nobody, as even NIST will admit, knows for sure how this really happened.

This is about as crappy an article as I've seen about the movement. The article is basically an opportunity for the author to plug the new NIST report, and use it as a means to futher stigmatize our efforts.

"To be sure, the vast majority of Americans dismiss these allegations outright." This quote follows a sitation of the Zogby poll that demonstrated that 42% of the public question the official story. Can anyone say internal logic?

In the side column we find this gem. "Allegation: That Air Force fighter jets did not intercept the hijacked planes, even after one crached into the WTC, is proof the military let the attacks happen. Rebuttal: The 9/11 hijackers turned off their planes' transponders, making them very difficult to track. ALSO, THE MILITARY HAD ALMOST NO EXPERIENCE OR READINESS TO INTERCEPT PLANES FLYING OVER THE UNITED STATES."

The allegation is misleading, and the rebuttal is uneducated, asinine, and even deceptive. Either way, this guy obviously doens't know the first thing about 9/11. As we know, the military has its own radar system that is able to track all planes in U.S. airspace. And someone needs to send this guy a link about the hundred or so interceptions that happen every year.

Let's all not be so eager for press that we ignore the harmful nature of pseudo-journalism that makes us look nuts. Ya, he plugged Loose Change, and NY911Truth. In this way, all press IS good press, as people may be inspired to inquire about the issue. I do see the good. But I would ask you to really think about why he wrote the piece. Do you feel like he cares about the truth?

The wagons are circling. The 9/11 truth movement is making progress, and the mainstream has hunkered down for a fight. There will be many more stories written. There will be the occasional gem. We are gaining new supporters all the time. But at present, there is much more politically motivated, critically uninformed, and socially irresponsible crap being written about the subject.

A.M. New York is the right of center free daily in NYC. Its only a bit better than the Post. So I'm not surprised. But I do hope that we send this guy more mail about the facts, than thanks for his support.

(*ed : whoeever that spam bot actor was,
it wasn't ewing2001!)

April 21, 2007
Spam Bot - "Actor" bumps back old pro Haupt/ewing2001 blog at 911blogger
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=3292

By ewing2001

Spam Bot - "Actor" bumps back old
pro Haupt/ewing2001 blog at 911blogger
picked up at:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/2421
Submitted by rc5781 on Sat, 04/21/2007

"...discount original cialis Purchase cialis On line wellbutrin Wellbutrin without prescription Effects Of Ultram Discount Ultram No Prescription brand carisoprodol with online consult Discount carisoprodol overnight generic ultram capsules Get low cost ultram Purchase Discount Fioricet order fioricetFioricet Without Prescription Generic butalbital advice Butalbital mg online ..." Cheapest fioricet now

Submitted by ewing2001 on Fri, 09/01/2006

Correction:
I wasn't mentioned in 'am', but 'TheVillager'.

http://www.thevillager.com/villager_174/5yearslater.html
Volume 76, Number 15 | August 30 -September 5, 2006

5 years later, 9/11 skeptics feel they’re close to truth
By David Spett

"...One 9/11 Truth member, Nico Haupt, believes the conspiracy behind 9/11 extends beyond the government. At the Aug. 6 St. Mark’s meeting, Haupt criticized the mainstream 9/11 Truth movement, saying it has “oppressed” his questions and research.

“I created a science group in 2002, which were working for four years, hard, 24/7, opposed by leaders close to the 9/11 Truth movement,” Haupt told the audience, adding that his science group consists of nine researchers and 600 members...

+++++

Wheels of Steeeel 2007
("Grand"master Morgan & Furious Jimbo Mix)
http://www.livevideo.com/ewing2001

++++

Nico Haupt Speech vs. Professor Jones at nyc911 event with Jim Fetzer:

http://www.911researchers.com/node/422#comment-3050
Submitted by ewing2001 on Sat, 2007-04-21 16:01.

I also was invited at the Blue Loft event as a last minute speaker. Before i started we played some 9/11 Video Mash-Ups in the background on a projector, though the sound was a bit tuned down. I counted maybe 20-30 people in the audience.

This was my speech:

"...thx peggy, glad that i am here ;

I also would like to thank Ronald Wiecks producer Gary Popkin of Hardfire TV for inviting Jim Fetzer into NYC ;

This gives us an opportunity to confront him on some Issues
and/or debate with him many details on both tv fakery research and the political significance of the existance and effectivity of exoW .

I use the abbreviation of exoW to include directed energy weaponry and many other unknown unconventional weaponry we might not even know all of their names yet.

Most of them had been developed, produced and "tested"
before and after 9/11 and most obviously on the day of 9/11 itself.

Since i was invited on the last minute i will just introduce myself and then raise two points.

I am speaking here both as a researcher and as a political media activist.
I am most active online now rather than in the streets.

I have been a 9/11 investigator since the morning of 9/11. And yes, even then was already convinced at least some footage was faked or at the least dramatized.

The concept "no-planes" was first used as an insulting label against researchers such as myself, but some of us have ourselves adopted it polemically.

I would personally formulate it as, "nothing plus x" hit the south tower.
The formula among no-planers depend on their further interest on forensic evidence which sometimes can lead to a "forensic hangout" or not.
In the worst scenario i call this planehugging as well, no matter if they call themselves noplaners or someone else labelled them as such from outside.

Back to the traditional idea of 9/11 TV Fakery, which is a "subset of the evidence":

During 2006 and now in 2007 we also developed the concept of the so called 9/11 video mashups, such an on youtube, livevideo etc.

I wanted to thank fetz for linking to video mashups of myself and my associate fred aka Bsregistration, whose 9/11 Octopus DVD will be available in NYC soon.

"Now as the evidence for TV Fakery has become overwhelming, it is also clear that it's a key avenue for awakening newcomers to the lies of the Official Story"

...anyway, in these mashups we present different styles of presenting the evidence on 9/11 tv fakery, but also the oppression of evidence on exotic weaponry, or exo-weaponry.
i am convinced that more exo-weapons besides directed-energy were used to destroy the twin towers.

I have pointed out in my latest findings, thats possible that improved nuclear systems could have been used, but also perhaps antimatter- or even neutrino weaponry.

Which brings us to PJones.

Where i politically disagree with Fetzer is that he protects Jones on a political level. He argues on science and against thermite, but ignores Jones' past with exotic weaponry
incl. at the KEK (in Japan) where jones observed neutrino weaponry experiments and maybe even protects the real 9/11 perps who used his knowlegde to develop the weapons.
I call this "bodyguarding" of jones.

I also call Pjones a political traitor, White Collar Criminal and/or desktop criminal.
I will explain this:
Pjones "Has a background in exotic weapons research", he is "covering up the use of exotic weapons" and "ridiculed the work of professor Wood, Fetzer, and Reynolds".

Jones is also highly complicit in the cover-up of free-energy for his role as ([Poppy]) Bush's "chief investigator" of cold fusion. This is the so-called "Heavy Watergate" scandal. I call jones a traitor to humanity for covering up this knowledge. Eugene Mallove, the leading free-energy researcher, called Steve Jones a fraud. Mallove was mysteriusly assassinated.

[breath]

Judy Wood's grad student, Michael Zebuhr, exposed Steve Jones as a fraud for his 9/11 research and was mysteriously assassinated.

I refer here to 911researchers.com for more on all these issues.

I would like Jim to publicly address all of these issues. I would also like Jim to comment on former Star Wars head Bob Bowman and former Star Wars/Trailblazer contractor Jim Hoffman or even NSA laser-researcher Greg Jenkins.

And whether any of these people are tied to the "Directed-Energy Professional Society" at deps.org.

They organized at least 50 public conferences and workshops since 2000!
...

..im [also] happy that we have an opportunity to now show some/one of the most popular 9/11 video mashups so far.

thx peggy and the audience for having an ear on all this..."

++++++

http://www.911researchers.com/blog/9
The 9/11 StarWars ExoW CoverUp:
Why NASA and NGA was part of the Perp System