Daniel Sunjata... who is that good looking guy in the blue shirt? :)

Good job Daniel.

---

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Daniel you are an inspiration brother. If only more public people would speak out. We live in strange times that so many know the truth yet so few have the courage to speak up. Keep it up, we need your intelligent voice to never shut up. Can you get some more of your TV and movie cronies to join your fight? No offense but sadly Americans seem to pay rapt attention to celebrity. Surely there are more among your ranks than just you, Charlie Sheen and Rosie O?

By the way, what are we to make of this delay in a ruling? I'm curious how others are interpreting the court's silence so far.

Excellent hard hitting impacting interview!

Thanks for getting the truth out there. You made some good points.

That's a breakthrough for us, relativity minor, but a breakthrough nonetheless.

You can't help but feel at the same time though how sad and disturbing it is that the only significant media coverage we can get on this crucial issue is from a news agency of a country whose relations with us range from difficult to hostile.

Still, we keep pushing regardless. Like that line out of Eye of the Tiger:

"They stack the odds, still we take to the streets..."

"Active Thermitic Material..." is NOT listed in ProjectCensored.org lists for 2009 or 2010. Where did I get this idea?

There was a post here on 911blogger a while back claiming that ProjectCensored had included the paper in its current list. But it is not there! No one at 911blogger updated the post about it.

However, # 24, "Japan Questions 9/11 and the Global War on Terror", IS listed for 2009. However, no mention of nanothermite in the dust there either.

99% of it is great, but unfortunate that he brings up (start of Part 2) --

"Whether you're talking about the questions surrounding 'what hit the Pentagon', was it Flight 77? Was it a missile? . . . if it wasn't Flight 77, what happened to the people on Flight 77? . . ."

He does point out that the most damning evidence for him is the thermitic residues, but why give any credence at all to the missile claim? It suggests he hasn't looked much into the Pentagon issue, but is trying to represent a viewpoint that people appear to have.

This is why it's so important to critique stuff that is weak, false or mistaken, and correct it.

Pentagon Attack Errors

There are numerous pieces of evidence that point to the attack on the Pentagon being an inside job. These include:

* The location of the attack: The portion of the Pentagon that was struck was nearly empty due to a renovation program.
* The aircraft approach maneuver: The attack plane executed an extreme spiral dive maneuver to strike said portion of the building from the southwest, opposite the direction from which it approached the capital.
* The incompetence of the alleged pilot: Flight 77 was supposedly piloted by Hani Hanjour, about whom a flight instructor said: "He couldn't fly at all".
* Signs of a cover-up: Numerous actions by officials indicate an ongoing cover-up of the facts concerning the attack.

These and other undisputed facts, constituting highly incriminating evidence of involvement of officials in the attack and coverup, have been largely eclipsed by an ongoing controversy over whether the Pentagon was hit by a jetliner at all. From early 2002, some skeptics of the official story have maintained that the Pentagon was attacked, not by a jetliner, but one of or a combination of a truck bomb, a missile or cruise missile, an attack drone aircraft or commuter jet, a flyover by a 757, and internal demolition charges. 9-11 Research provides a history of Pentagon strike theories.
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/index.html

Jon, next time you see him at an event, maybe you could give him Frank Legge's paper?

Two suggestions:
When talking about building 7, ask to show the footage!
Only part of the wtc 7 collapse was free fall. Enough to proove the point though!