Recent Headlines
Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Recent Media
Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
They will not control us.
Confronting 9/11 commissioner John Lehman
Madeline Albright confronted on Bilderberg and New World Order Crimes including 9/11
WeAreChangeLA Confronts Amy Goodman On Alleged Progressive Media's Blackout And Smear Campaign Of Real 9/11 Investigation
Dr. Graeme MacQueen on Myth and Foreign Policy
US poet JerryMazza RussiaToday August 02, 2009
War on Terror: Expenditures
New DVD - Steven Jones: Nano-Thermite
MI5 officer visited Morocco three times while Binyam Mohamed was tortured
Real Time problems with Bill Maher?
WeAreChangeLA delivers scientific proof of 9/11 TREASON
Richard Gage, AIA and AE911Truth Staff at the Recent AIA Convention in Washington DC
Russia Today covers Richard Gage's efforts in Washington D.C.
AUDIO: Jonathan Cole on WENG Radio, Englewood Fl.
AUDIO: Truth Action Ottawa interviews Cosmos from truthaction.org
VIDEO: Star Wars & False Flag Terrorism 2.0
VIDEO: Annie Machon and Barrie Zwicker
AUDIO: Peter Dale Scott on "Diet Soap"
AUDIO: AE911Truth on KGO AM Radio
VIDEO: Jonathan Kay, "Journalist", comes back for more 9/11 Truth
VIDEO: Dr. Steven Jones at UC Davis - May1, 2009
VIDEO: Richard Gage AIA on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, CA
VIDEO: AE911Truth “Companion” Edition 10-Minute WTC 7 Video
AUDIO: Visibility 9-11 Welcomes John-Michael Talboo and Stewart Bradley of Debunking the Debunkers
Banner Exchange
User login
9/11 Related Sites
911Research.WTC7.net
911speakout.org
911review.com
world911truth.org
911proof.com
truthmove.org
911pressfortruth.com
patriotsquestion911.com
csi911.info
911revisited.com
william911.com
911debunkers.blogspot.com
Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
International Citizens' Inquiry Into 9/11
truthaction.org
911readingroom.org
911reports
9eleven.info
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
deceptiondollar.com
legitgov.org
911omissionreport.com
911tv.org
pnacitizen.org
thedebate.org
grandtheftcountry.com
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
flight93crash.com
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
mime11.com
physics911.net
911docs.net
9/11 International Sites
torontochange.com
911sandhed.nu
www.i11time.dk
reopen911.info
investigar11s.org
911truth.no
911belgium.be
v911truth.org
stoplying.ca
911truth.eu
911truthpeterborough.com
luogocomune.net
911info.se
1192001.dk
11syyskuu.org
serendipity.li
eqgen.nl/aanslagen911
onderzoek911.nl
waarheid911.nl
zapruder.nl
911truthbristol.com
911truthtotnes.com
september11.se
vaken.se
911oz.com
nineeleven.co.uk
hintergrund.de
broeckers.com
thecoop.tv
operation911.de
medienanalyse-international.de
911komplott.de
deepjournal.com
truth4peace.co.uk
911truthskipton.com
wytruth.org.uk
editionsdemilune.com
cremationofcare.com
Investigate 9/11
9/11 Truth Europe
911.yweb.sk
9/11 Memorial Sites
News and Blogs
Wikileaks
Project Censored
Freedoms Phoenix
Cryptome
Truth Alliance Network
Dandelion Salad
The New American Dream
George Washington
The Raw Story
The Real News.com
The Daily Dirt
Better Bad News
Featured Story
infowars.com
meria.net
maxkeiser.com
Ignorance Isnt Bliss
rinf.com
Public Policy News and Research
informationclearinghouse.info
globalresearch.ca
mathaba.net
flybynews.com
Dandelion Salad
Mark Crispin Miller
Pimpin' Turtle
American's Journey
damien911.blogspot.com
Rosie.com
Questioning the War on Terrorism
culhavoc.blogsome.com
arabesque911.blogspot.com
dailypaul.com
Why is the Mainstream Media not Demanding the Truth About 9/11?
Why is the Mainstream Media not Demanding the Truth About 9/11?
1. Former FBI Translator and Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds has exposed, among many other disturbing revelations, that Osama bin Laden and "Al Qaeda" (which simply means "the base") were working with government intelligence operatives right up until the morning of 9/11 (and perhaps beyond):
http://amconmag.com/article/2009/nov/01/00006/
2. The 9/11 Commission Report has been exposed as almost entirely untrue by John Farmer, the Dean of Rutgers School of Law--Newark who served as Senior Counsel to the Commission:
http://media-newswire.com/release_1098894.html
3. No reasonably intelligent and rational individual could possibly watch the full two hours of this video and still honestly believe everything the American government has told its citizens about the events of 11 September 2001:
http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov11.htm
4. The 9/11 Truth Movement ebbs and flows ... losing credibility with each Alex Fox media stunt and every (planted?) Icke-ish nut claiming alien lizard people or Apocalyptic demons are to blame ... then regaining momentum whenever one more brave citizen opens their mind to the harsh facts and horrible ramifications of what the truth might be, and demands an unbridled investigation knowing they will be called "kook" or "communist" by scared Sheeple seeking to maintain the bliss of ignorance. This will go on, ad nauseum and forever, until the Truth of 9/11 is fully investigated and openly exposed.
So again I ask, why is the mainstream media not demanding the truth about 9/11?
Whatever happened to investigative journalism?
Hat Tip to Bruce Arnold
Signatory, 911 Truth Statement & Petition (911Truth.org|ae911Truth.org)
See David Ray Griffin's "9/11 and Nationalist Faith"
The media's main job is not to damage the public religion that the US is the Greatest Country on Earth, then they're subservient to profit/advertisers.
The Corpse Media subvert, not serve, the public interest
It's astounding the number of facts that conflict with, contradict and disprove the OCT which MSM have reported, yet there is still no honest investigation and reporting.
http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
Some journalists and reporters have dug into certain aspects, but their findings are not widely reported, unlike politician's sex scandals, trivial by comparison, which get massive coverage. Many journalists and reporters self-censor, knowing where the line is- and the treatment of Van Jones sends a public signal to everyone who raises the specter of 'unanswered questions'. Other 'journalists' and 'reporters' actively shill for the OCT.
Editors, publishers, board members and corporate parents actively gate-keep- see this piece by Glenn Greenwald on the owners of NBC and Fox colluding to stop the collateral damage on their interests caused by the Olbermann-O'Reilly wars:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/08/04/olbermann/index.html
The post author (Bruce Arnold?) observes, "This will go on, ad nauseum and forever, until the Truth of 9/11 is fully investigated and openly exposed." Yes, i think it will- the questions and implications are too huge, and the claim that 9/11 was fully investigated and there's nothing else to be told quickly falls apart on examination.
One point about Farmer, though- i keep seeing variations of the claim that he's contradicting the Commission Report; his book publicity sound bite, “At some level of government, at some point in time, a decision was made not to tell the truth about the national response to the attacks on the morning of 9/11. We owe the truth to the families of the victims of 9/11. We owe it to the American public as well, because only by understanding what has gone wrong in the past can we assure our nation’s safety in the future.” refers primarily to the false statements made by NORAD officials to the public and to the Commission.
Farmer does address this in greater detail than the Commission did, but this was already public info- just buried along with all the other major news the 'media' fail to cover honestly. the Commission acknowledged 'inaccurate' testimony on pg 34 and presented their version of events. About the Commission, Farmer said, "I think the report is, uh, extremely accurate, and- and sets forth the facts of 9/11." http://www.bradblog.com/?page_id=7416 Farmer blames Bin Laden and Al Qaeda for 9/11, and 'bureaucracy' and the Clinton Administration for failing to prevent it. I haven't finished the book, but so far Farmer's an apologist for the OCT, with a slightly different perspective on it.
Apologist
I agree that Farmer should be looked at as both an apologist for the OCT and a critic of the Commission. We need to use his "revelations" to our advantage wherever possible but also stay attentive for expanded "incompetence theory," which as best as I can tell is what his story is all about. Honestly, I don't trust anything he says, but I'm not that important.The movement needs to vet everything he says very carefully.
Farmer's book good for some things
1) It's getting new media and public attention on the story of NORAD officials having made 'false statements' to the public as well as under oath, which never got much coverage in the first place. Plus, this puts attention on the Commission's narrative, which has flaws and omissions and is based on materials that may have been tampered with- staff raised questions about this in memos and emails.
2) Farmer's blaming 'bureaucracy' and Clinton and apologizing for the Bush Administration while omitting significant info in the public record makes it clear the former Team 8 leader has an agenda, and his book cannot be relied on impartial or accurate. Farmer told Friedman he was perfectly fine with Bush and Cheney being interviewed together, in private, not under oath, under a 3 hr time limit, with no recording and with notes confiscated and subject to censorship prior to their being used in the report. Any media that cite Farmer's book expose themselves as clueless or having an agenda.
3) Farmer may actually give some new info that will illuminate some things, if only in that it contradicts what's been represented. I'm using a highlighter and may put together a list of stuff at some point, but probably simuvac and some of the prolific history commons contributors will beat me to it.
I don't trust John Farmer one bit.
He is a damage control gatekeeper through and through.
Apparently quite a few people over at Amazon think so too, judging by their customer reviews of his book. (It has an average rating of 2.5 stars out of 5, and the lowest possible rating a person can give a product is one (rather than zero) star.
Farmer is doing his job...
I have XM in my car and it is usually tuned to Air America (or whatever it is called now, channel 167), mostly for Thom Hartmann & Malloy. On my way into town for a few errands I just heard a couple minutes of Farmer being interviewed on Left Jab (http://www.leftjabradio.com/). The hosts opened by quoting Farmer's 'explosive' statement that "blah, blah, we weren't told the truth about 9/11" (paraphrasing...yawn), then asked Farmer to elaborate. Farmer's response right out the gate (paraphrasing again):
"Let me just preface by saying that I think the 9/11 Commission did an excellent job in laying out the facts of 9/11...blah, blah, blahbetty, blah". It was almost word for word what he said during Brad Friedman's interview. I had to shut the damned radio off. It is becoming increasingly clear to me that Farmer's 'job' is to capture the attention of those who might be even a little skeptical of the official bedtime story, reinforce the incompetence theory while pushing his talking point that the Commission Report is golden. Sure seems that way to me.
Why are they not demanding the truth about 9/11?
For the same reason they are not demanding (or telling) the truth about a whole bunch of other stuff as well.
Here's just a partial list:
http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/category/two-thousand-and-ten...
They are not known as media-whores for nothing. Their job is NOT to enlighten and inform but more to cover up and obfuscate and keep under wraps the information that would bring the system crashing down around our ears were it to become widely known, and 9/11 is just one part of it.
Not to mention if they were to start covering 9/11 honestly, they would have to admit they had been lying to us for the last 8 years, and then we would say, "Oh really? Well what else have you been lying to us about that you haven't come clean on as of yet?" - talk about opening a whole new can of worms.
I read the book
IMO his analysis is flawed because he doesn't even consider the possibility of corruption. One of his main references is the work of Amy Zegart. While Farmer and Zegart make good points about bureaucratic problems their analysis doesn't ring true when they pretend that the conduct of specific officials wasn't applicable to the success of the attacks. There are repeated instances where individuals acted in a manner indicative of bad faith. Instances where individuals took advantage of bureaucratic problems in order to impede al Qaeda related investigations. The Farmer/Zegart analysis tracks with the popular media view of holding powerful officials to an extremely low standard of conduct. Tenet's contradictory conduct--dire warnings of possible attacks vs. withholding of information about suspected perpetrators of those possible attacks--couldn't possibly be chalked up to some sort of political corruption. It simply had to be because the CIA was still on Cold War footing.
If Farmer/Zegart are right then why on earth are 9/11 Commission MFR's with intelligence agents involved in the al-Hazmi/al-Mihdhar withholding still classified in 2009?!
media
The media have been bought out, or, rather, bought up. Big corporations own them and they toe the corporate line. Don't be expecting any truth out of them.
We'll have to do it ourselves.
Spec
Orwell's World
Seeing the footage of the protesters at the G-20 in Pittsburgh and hearing the voice on the police bullhorn and not seeing it on the MSM kinda knocked the wind out of me. Sibel Edmunds testifies and not a whimper from MSM. Now the latest stories on the MSM is Polanski and Letterman when there is so much to report. It all seems really Orwellian until I click on my internet and get fed the truth. The media is all they have left to try and keep the masses sleeping, but they can't get it done, because I know the truth and I am going to tell others where to find the truth. They're losing their grip because of the internet. Don't know much about him, but Damn he was good with his predictions, but maybe for humanities sake he just left out that golden nugget...the internet.
G.O.P. George Orwell Party
Free world?
Let's just hope they don't figure out a way to pull the plug on the net through some "national security" crisis. Is that technically possible? It would kill the only part of the US economy that actually works (tech sector). Where would we be then? Not trying to be gloomy, but recent events make me not put anything past these criminals.
Besides all the points mentioned
thereÄ's a simple reason as well: They were fed with the governtment version of the events, repeated that over and over, and were totally duped.
For me it's plain simple: As the first questions arose back in 2002/2003, the media did nothing other than to attack those who questioned their version. That's only plausible if they knew back then that their story was a lie.
ae
just sent the ae9/11 truth flash to 12 architects here in london uk
Travelling 9/11 Truth lecturers- I can give you a free ride between London UK airports and London UK hotels.
Previous happy customers RG + DRG ! Pls liaise with your UK hosts- they may know me.
e-mail me dont3fanATgmailDOTcom
ae II
just stood up, having written that and my phone rang - an architect calling me for work !
(had to post my details in order to access the emails!!)
Travelling 9/11 Truth lecturers- I can give you a free ride between London UK airports and London UK hotels.
Previous happy customers RG + DRG ! Pls liaise with your UK hosts- they may know me.
e-mail me dont3fanATgmailDOTcom









To quote Carl Cameron...
Because everything has to go through Media Relations.
And like I said before, back in Nazi Germany it was at least more honestly titled: "Ministry of Propaganda."