Digg
http://digg.com/politics/9_11_Whistleblower_Sibel_Edmonds_Testimony_Unde...

Reddit
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/9dqxg/911_whistleblower_sibel_...

http://911reports.com
http://www.historycommons.org

At 11:55, on the 1st video, after the 1st break, Sibel is asked about her claim of US govt/FBI/DOJ IG had documents from April 01 showing Bin Laden was planning attacks on 4-5 US cities with planes and operatives were already in the country; Sibel clarifies this info came from Sarshar's translation from an Iranian asset's info, and she took Sarshar to the 9/11 Commission, and also reported this to the DOJ IG.

EDIT- When asked if this was why the 9/11 families wanted her to testify, she says she's not sure- that she thought it had to do with Saudi Arabia's financing of Al Qaeda...

I just discovered that the 'rewind' button takes you all the way back to the beginning of the segment...

this thing needs to be downloaded- if anyone has a .flv converter that works, please grab it!!!!

I sure wish i could get the transcript....

http://911reports.com
http://www.historycommons.org

http://newsdemocrat.com/SiteImages/FileGallery/Sibel_transcript_393.pdf

.................Doesn't this make you want to puke? Your a good man, and your efforts are noble. This make me so sad that our country can do this.

Care to elaborate?

________________________
“The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today -- my own government.” -Martin Luther King, Jr.
http://www.ubuntu.com

1) She promotes "Al-Qaeda" as a legitimate organization.
2) She has such incriminating information but has kept it to herself even though by releasing it, it could have done a lot of good.

that's a good start.

She addresses the organization of Al-Qaeda as a tool for elements within the U.S. Government? Even though she tried to do things by not breaking the law? Even though her sister in Turkey was threatened? I hope that if ever you are in the same situation she is, that you handle things as well as she has.

Edit: I bet I can even guess the third reason. That "gatekeeper" sites like DailyKos, and others have been willing to cover Sibel, therefore that means she is "safe" to the "powers that be." I'm willing to bet that it NEVER occurred to those sites what Sibel was even about other than her claim that they slowed down translations to increase budgets. They didn't understand what they had. Now that Sibel has become truly explosive, where are those sites now? Are they covering her?

Many stories are inter-twined in a complex web of lies and decete according to Sibel Edmunds (SE). She says that Mr. and Mrs Major Douglas Dickerson who worked with Douglas Feith, succeeded in blocking her complaint against Turkish Zionist forces which had penetrated the FBI, the Pentagon, and the highest levels of the US governemt.

But how far can we trust her?

SE says Turkish/Israeli collaborations were in place with USA secret pro-zionist interests at the Pentagon (Douglas Feith et al) to de-stabalise Russian hinterland in Central Asia. In return, Nuclear, intelligence, funding, arms, and narco traffic privelages were in place as rewards in the other direction in the favour of Turkish and Israeli interests.

That is pobably true. After all Turkey is a loyal NATO member, and an ally of Israel, and the USA war on terror.

According to an Armenian News site however, it was Wayne Madsen who outed Jan Schakowsky (Démocrate-Illinois) as the poor congress woman blackmailed by the Turkish/Israeli opperation that Sibel Edmunds refers to annonymously. According to the Armenians, and to SE, she was blackmailed in part for her NOT to endorce the Armenian genocide resolution against Turkey.
http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=53817

But the story could be wider.

Schakowski had opposed the Iraq War Resolution, opposed private military contractors, and opposed U.S. Israeli policy. And remember she was a founding member of the Out-of-Iraq Caucus.

Schakowski could have been outed by the Bush faction just as well, like Velery Plame Wilson, and her Brewster Jennings Associats, that CIA front company that was outed by Mr. Grossman the former USA ambassador to Turkey and the highest ranking official in the state department for operations in Central Asia, because of the called bluff on the Niger-Iraq Yellow cake lies of Colin Powel fame.

"Schakowsky was “set up” by the Turkish Lobby, working in concert with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), to “control her.”
"... Schakowsky noticeably “backed off” many issues, including the role of private military companies."

"In January 2007, after the Democrats captured the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi appointed Schakowsky to be a member of the House Select Committee on Intelligence. Currently, Schakowsky is chair of the House Select Committee on Intelligence’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations -- which puts her in a conflict-of-interest in investigating Turkish and related Israeli intelligence penetration of the FBI and State Department, as stated under oath by Edmonds, and the paying of bribes by Turkish government interests to current and former members of Congress."I quote Wayn Madsen
http://www.mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=621551

Meanwhile please note that on July 17, 2009, Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-IL, Chairwoman of the House Intelligence Subcommittee on Investigations & Oversight, issued the following statement to announce a full investigation into certain CIA programs and the Congressional notification process.

“The House Intelligence Committee will move forward with a full investigation that will explore certain CIA programs and the core issue of how the committee is kept informed. My subcommittee will take the lead on significant portions of the investigation; we will explore instances where the Congress was not informed in a timely way and situations in which laws may have been broken.
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/il09_schakowsky/pr_intelcomciainves...

Could there be a power struggle going on? Could Sibel Edmunds be working to dissiminate popaganda against the anti-Bush camp?

Danse:
Your comments are worthy of merit. At least worthy of informed discussion rather than just negatives from people who probably did not listen to the tapes. The transcript by the way incrypts all mention of AIPAC to APAC or ATAC. Did you notice that too?