What were some of the places she told her to look?

There's a ton of public material, even in the Commission Report, that contradicts/casts doubt on the Commission's conclusions of Al Qaeda alone and failure of imagination/system, etc.

The Commission's conflicts of interest and failure to investigate and answer the families questions cast additional doubt that the Report is legitimate, and leaves open the question of whether it was an active cover up

Then there's the evidence that points to involvement by other parties, such as the WTC destruction, insider trading, complete collapse of FAA/NORAD SOP 4 times, no one held accountable/whistleblowers ignored/threatened while the 'incompetent' or 'criminally negligent' who failed to respond and obstructed investigations got rewarded...

As 9/11 was used to justify wars and a police state, it's entirely appropriate to examine the events in the context of the pretexts for other wars/attacks on the Constitution/invention and demonization of 'enemies'- such as the Maine, Pearl Harbor, Operation Northwoods, Kennedy assassination, Gulf of Tonkin

http://911reports.com

Imagine a teacher who supports the OCT, and a female student who lost her father on 9/11. The student googles, discovers a massive cover up, and an avalanche of evidence of US government complicity. She comes back crying, and begs the teacher not to have to write on the subject. The teacher then says "Oh! You are just looking in the wrong place. Look here (JREF) and here (Pat Curley) and here (Mark Roberts)"

An alternative could be "Oh! Here's how you conduct research. You look for many sources. Here's some information on how to do solid research and check your facts. Have you considered alternative viewpoints and compared them on their merits? Your sources seem a bit one-sided."

I found this article posted in Sept. of 2005. The story didn't make the blogger as far as I could tell, I did a quick site search and didn't find anything.but I didn't get through all of the results though.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050926/wiener

This piece does name some specific texts and professors and the approaches taken. Of course none hint at government complicity. Maybe a few well written emails to the authoring professors might lead to revisions? Not sure.

The article does state that the vast majority of schools lag far behind in updated texts that even include 9/11. My son just graduated high school this month, my daughter just two years ago. When I have talked with their friends, many have already seen movies such as zeitgeist and loose change and are fairly convinced we have been lied to. I find that to be a very positive thing. I did have the opportunity with a history teacher in their school (he's the brother of one my band members) and approaches the topic like "walking on eggshells." First he doesn't believe the OCT one bit and neither did the majority of his students. Regardless, he can't risk promoting complicity theories without bringing up a firestorm if it gets home to the parents. He can only advise them to research it themselves. I also spoke to my own college history professor at an alumni dinner back on '07. He wouldn't give me much in details, but did say he avoided the topic in the classroom whenever possible and won't teach contemporary U.S. History anymore. He prefers world history (ancient egypt, rome, greece etc...) Frankly I feel sorry for them and especially now after I read this article (link below) about Obama's spies in the classroom, I can't blame him for avoiding it altogether.

http://www.counterpunch.com/price06232009.html

Peace all

dtg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"History is not history unless it is the truth." —Abraham Lincoln
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------