It is easy to get sidetracked, loose your train of thought, think that you said something because you were headed there, get flustered, get baited and not know what to say. Noory said that 80% percent of callers were favorable to Gage. Lets give him an 8 or better or better yet you talk to millions on this topic and show us how it is done

http://www.711911.webs.com/
http://www.northtexas911truth.com/
http://9-11.meetup.com/249/

Excellent comments Cornelius - I will take them to heart. I think I was a little challenged about how to fill 2+ hours. And I did lose track a few times! I am aware of the options for sol-gel type nanothermite applications.

Thank you!

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

Wheel Of Fortune. I would come up with answers from the couch on a regular basis.

As someone who has been in media, I can tell you that being on the air live adds a level of difficulty.

Richard Gage is an architect who has become a media spokesperson. I think he did an excellent job. Was he perfect? No.

Was it a positive interview for 911 Truth? Yes.

Is there room for improvement? Sure. We can always do better.

I think your message has some pertinent assessments, but it is the tone that makes me recoil a bit.

It has that "I think I could do it much better" tone.

If this is the case, then, by all means, step up to the microphone.

I would give this interview 9 out of 10. I don't think the picture is quite as bleak as Cornelius sees it, although he makes good points.

First of all, I am not convinced that George Noory is an "agent". There were certainly a thousand ways this interview could have been derailed, but it did not happen. A great deal of good info got out. It is true that he has been surprisingly slow to embrace the Truth movement, but he seems to be venturing more deeply into the territory (witness this interview). But that might have something to do with the perception of 9-11 truth by the majority of his listeners. Perhaps the tide is turning, therefore he dares to venture further. The "steering conversation away from nanothermite to pull-it" might have more to do with George's own personality than him being a shill. Every host brings his own personality to the show and the "pull-it" might have been something that has been bothering him personally, so he goes for it.

Second, about specualtion. I think some speculation is needed. Many people have a major blockage to this info unless you can show at least purely speculatively, how something (like wiring WTC for demolition) COULD theoretically be done. I saw a post somewhere where a guy rejected the demolition hypothesis just for the reason that there were too many people at WTC at all times in order to sneak in explosives undetected. But that is precisely the reason why it would have been so EASY. Nobody would ask questions if a truck with "UPS" or "Wonderbread" sign would back up to the docs. Dr. Jones once mentioned something about "20 trips for 10 guys" (or was it vice versa -- 10 trips for 20 guys -- I don't remember?) which is all it takes to set the charges in place. People need to be given an idea how easy it actually is. (Well, preparations, such as planning and wiring might take much more effort, but setting the actual charges would probably not.) Of course, any speculation needs to be clearly pre- and post-faced with a statement that this is just a speculation, that we have no idea how it was actually done, unless we have a real investigation.

Third, I agree with others that Mr. Gage is getting better and better (and so is the website). He is really amazing -- his effort, efficiency and presentation.