Raw Story just posted a developing headline (with no other text yet):

"US releases hundreds of 9/11 attack photos,
22 videos; Some graphic. . . Developing. . ."

What's up?

jfal, that news is also posted here on another recent thread. The US courts have released all the "so called" evidence from the Mussaoui trial. Some interesting stuff in there.

The New York Times and the Washington post are owned by the Federal Reserve bankers. As you know the federal reserve is not really federal, its privately owned. After, reading the URL below, I am not real sure that the New York Times is eager about bringing up 911 as being an inside job to say the least.

Look at this URL. It tells it all. Be prepared for a big paradigm shift.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm

Its also in book form, The Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins and Ezra pound, about 200 pages.

Here is one quote in this book and url about Kuhn, Loeb and Schiff buying the New York Times.

On November 13, 1914, in a letter to Sir Valentine Chirol, Spring-Rice wrote, (p. 241, v. 2)

"I was told today that The New York Times has been practically acquired by Kuhn, Loeb and Schiff, special protégé of the (German) Emperor. Warburg, nearly related to Kuhn Loeb and Schiff is a brother of the well known Warburg of Hamburg, the associate of Ballin (Hamburg) Amerika line), is a member of the Federal Reserve Board or rather THE member. He practically controls the financial policy of the Administration, and Paish & Blackett (England) had mainly to negotiate with him. Of course, it was exactly like negotiating with Germany. Everything that was said was German property."

The NYT Barrett article is ok, but I see it's in the "Education" section of the paper. Is this section nationwide or only in the NYC metro area? Is it only in the electronic edition or is also in the printed editions?

Also, I don't like incomplete quotes like: "He also said fires could not have caused the collapse of the World Trade Center towers at free-fall speed, as reported by the special Sept. 11 commission.".... It's very misleading to leave out WHY Barrett blieves this! NYT (deliberately?) makes Barrett sound like he doubts this just for the hell of it, as if he has no other explanation.

OT: CRAP!!!

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Is this for real?

http://www.bbclosangeles.com/BBCNEWS_Mel_Gibson_Arrested_On_Terrorism.ht...

"This is a faux news article..." at bottom of page.

But very "fair & balanced" though! I here Sen. Rick Santorum will be going live with a press conference on the details shortly.

Followed by an appearance on Hannity & Colmes.

Excellent S-B!

Folks, don't get over-confident that the truth is spreading fast enough.

The C-SPAN & Barret stuff is good, but it's going to take an awful lot more than this to undo 5 years of hardcore msm brainwashing that, "Osama did it."

OT: Chris, with these prolonged record temperatures across North America, I suspect we may get a doozy of a hurricane season this year too.

You can keep calling on the NY Times to the "Challenge" but the Jews who own the paper are deaf, dumb, and blind to the Truth. Remember that papers like this are not in bed with the enemy, they are the enemy. Also keep in mind that, "All that glitters is not Gold."

http://www.gospelthomas.com/ gosp...elthomas47.html
AmandaReconwith | 08.01.06 - 1:59 pm | #

What the hell are you talking about? Take your bullsh!t some place else shill!

more like AmandaHugandKiss!

I second that.

Yo, dz and/or 911blogger design committee...I got my logo ringer tee a couple weeks ago and it is pretty sweet, but I didn't figure out until recently that the sketchy quality is because it is a lightweight tee. I figure the heavyweight will be more durable, but my next beef is with the logo coloring. 911blogger is an awesome logo, but those colors seem kind of faded and the stencil isn't that visible. I suggest one where the lettering is mostly dark and also a black tee with mostly white lettering, too. But, nothing too gaudy like those god-awful '80's-arena-rock Loose Change Investigate 911 shirts.

CYA Agents: Bush Hit Men Running Scared

Chris Floyd | Aug 1 2006

Like a gang of twitchy hit men afraid they've botched the job, the Bush Regime is creeping back to the scene of the crime: the Congressional backrooms where they thought they'd put the kibosh on the American Republic once and for all.

But it seems there is still a flicker of life in the victim -- and thus a threat that the gangsters might have to face the music somewhere down the line. So they went back to the bagmen on Capitol Hill this week, ordering their minions to provide retroactive legal cover for the rank offenses committed by the big boys at the top when they devised their torture regimen -- in knowing, deliberate violation of the U.S. War Crimes Act, which was passed by acclamation in the Republican-led Congress in 1996, and toughened up the following year with the support of the Pentagon, the Washington Post reports.

The moribund Republic, which the Bush gangsters had slowly tortured for years, was thought to have been finally bludgeoned to death when the Bushists brought out the blunt instrument of the "unitary executive" earlier this year. After the Regime's patently illegal domestic spying programs were revealed, the Regime at last dropped all pretense and openly declared a presidential dictatorship, insisting that any action ordered by the "Commander-in-Chief" is beyond the reach of law.
http://infowars.net/articles/August2006/010806CYA.htm

more like AmandaHugandKiss!
Drew M | Homepage | 08.01.06 - 2:53 pm |

I always think that whenever I see this posters name. I thought it was just me!

You can keep calling on the NY Times to the "Challenge" but the Jews who own the paper are deaf, dumb, and blind to the Truth. Remember that papers like this are not in bed with the enemy, they are the enemy. Also keep in mind that, "All that glitters is not Gold."

http://www.gospelthomas.com/ gosp...elthomas47.html
AmandaReconwith | 08.01.06 - 1:59 pm | #

Seriously where's your evidence that the NYtimes is run by "Jews". And even if it is so what, John Stewart from the daily show is a Jew, is he "the enemy" to? A lot of real Jews don't even support Israel, and as Webster Tarpley said Rabbi Michael Lerner of the "Tikkun movement" is pro 9/11 truth. Check out the Tikkun's magazine;

http://www.tikkun.org/

^ And if after looking at that you still think "the Jews" are "the enemy", then your seriously one brainwashed bigot.

"Asked last night about the executive order, a White House spokeswoman said she would have a response today."

Whatever happened to this?

If you are going to "poke fun" at Mel Gibson, you better have an ass just as good or better than he has.

>it's in the "Education" section of >the paper

The MSMs are all spinning the Barrett story to be a "teaching at universities" controversy. As if 9/11 fact or fiction wouldn't matter. They're downplaying the importance of 9/11 now when back then they trupetet it out like armageddon is upon us, and it still does matter: the stock markets (esp. oil) are hit every time a new phony Quaeda tape is released - how ridiculous, and all because of 9/11. And not to forget: the money being made with all these new 9/11 blockbuster movies.

Anonymous at 08.01.06 - 1:33 pm, you wrote:

""
... As you know the federal reserve is not really federal, its privately owned. ...
""

I see this claim made quite often by those in the patriot movement (of which movement, I count myself as a member). But this claim is what might be termed purely a "scare tactic," as it doesn't make much sense on logical grounds, but is intended to simply play on people's indoctrinated fears of big business (of which, the actual thing to fear in this regard is when big business is in bed with government).

The Federal Reserve is "private" much akin to how the Post Office is "private," or how Pravda under the U.S.S.R. was "private." Which is to say, it is not private at all, but is very much a government institution.

It may be "private" in the de jure sense, but that is merely words on paper. In the de facto sense, it is totally a branch and arm of the government.

Putting the Federal Reserve under the control of Congress wouldn't make our situation any better, as we would still suffer just as much from the fiat money, credit expansion, inflation, and the boom-bust so-called "business cycle" which that causes.

Our problem isn't the personalities who rule over us. It is the fact the we are ruled over in the first place, i.e., the fact that individuals (whoever they may be) hold such power at all. Transfer this immoral coercive power over others to individuals or groups who you think mean well and will make things right, and the same old process of rapine will continue on as before.

Our fight--if it is to make a real difference--is not against people, i.e., against personalities, however horrendous their deeds may be. If we simply replace those evildoers with "good people" while leaving in place the mechanism of rulership, then we will see our "good people" become the evildoers we previously fought against. The reason for this is because doing so ignores the incentive structure (i.e., the internal logic of the system) that rewards depredations of liberty.

In order to really form a free society, the only way to do so is to create a system wherein the internal logic of it tends toward ever more liberty--as opposed to the governmental system which inherently tends toward ever more tyranny, due to its incentive structure.

Our fight is necessarily institutional, if it is to be at all meaningful. What we fight against is the internal logic of the system (i.e., the rewards and incentives that the structure of the system necessarily advances, due to its inherent structual nature) which make staged events such as the 9/11 attacks inevitable (and far moreover, the regular usurpations of liberty that occur under said governmental system even without such dramatic Pearl Harbor-type events).

For more on this matter--concerning the incentive structure of social systems--see my below article:

"Government Causes the Crime," James Redford, first published at Anti-State.com circa October 2001:

http://www.geocities.com/vonchloride/govcause.html

Once one gets done reading my above article, one would do well to follow up with some of the articles listed in my below post:

"Recommended Reading Concerning Political and Economic Theory," TetrahedronOmega, September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/libertyandtruth/viewtopic.php?t=4&mforum=libertyan...

Bashing Jewish people or Muslims is all the same..a distraction.
There are bad apples in every "major religion" in the world.
There is only one person or group ,people should keep their energies focused on ..that's the Cheney Neocon Cabal..stay focused.

hipmeister- And Sam and Don Newhouse as well as the Bush Crime Family.