Morrissey booted from Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice?

I have been removed from the membership list at stj911.org, without a word of explanation, although I have been a member since the founding. I suspect it is because of my essay "9/11 Aletheia," which was published on OpEdNews.com (but rejected by 911blogger.com, also without explanation).

Is this any way for "Scholars" to behave? I can't say I'm surprised, but I was secretly hoping that I was wrong about the people who are obviously controlling things there. I was not. Read the essay at http://www.opednews.com/articles/9-11-Aletheia-by-Michael-Morrissey-090508-396.html .

I hope I don't get banned from 911blogger as well. We all need to think about what is going on here.

Michael...

This site does not, and will not promote obvious disinformation like TV Fakery, or the WTC demolition concepts represented by "Directed Energy Weapons" as put forth by Judy Wood, or the "Mini Nuke" idea put forward by Bill Deagle. I have made the reasons clear for this stance in the following articles on "Disinformation";

On Disinformation and Damaging Associations

My Really, Really Bad Judy Wood Experience

Deactivating Bill Deagle's "Neutron Fuse"

TV Fakery rides on the base concept that jumbo-jets never hit the WTC. They did, verifiable by 1st responder eyewitness statements, as well as video and photographic evidence. This is basic disinformation. This website was a target for disruption by the worst proponents of TV Fakery in 2006-2007 who charmingly refer to aircraft eyewitnesses (and their supporters) as "planehuggers".

DEW and Mini-nuke theories are only ideas. They have no realistic supporting evidence. If they aren't disinformation, they might as well be. It makes absolutely no sense to push these weak conjectures on the Congress. They will result in a massive waste of time.

Are you unaware that Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice was set up in response to disruption that destroyed the original Scholars for 9/11 Truth website, based on pushing these discredited theories, much of which was conducted by the three individuals you spin as poor innocent victims in your piece? I'm speaking of Fetzer, Reynolds and Wood.

Please take the time to read the three pieces I have linked above. My guess is that you will be unmoved by them, in which case you should stop participating here.

Take a couple weeks to think it over. In the meantime, your account goes into the moderation queue.

Comments are closed for this thread.