And either they are mistaken or they are involved in media disinformation.

YOU HEAR THAT CHOMSKY!!! WE ARE ON TO YOU!!!!!!!!!!!

Remember this classic Chomsky quote?

"The evidence for either thesis is, in my opinion, based on a failure to understand properly what evidence is. Even in controlled scientific experiments one finds all sorts of unexplained phenomena, strange coincidences, loose ends, apparent contradictions, etc. Read the letters in technical science journals and you'll find plenty of samples. In real world situations, chaos is overwhelming, and these will mount to the sky. That aside, they'd have had to be quite mad to try anything like that. It would have had to involve a large number of people, something would be very likely to leak, pretty quickly, they'd all be lined up before firing squads and the Republican Party would be dead forever."

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/STR505A.html

Hey, I re-wrote the "Officials from Across the Political Spectrum Question 9/11" table: http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/07/officials-from-across-polit...

Chris,

At this link, scroll down to the title "Alex Jones Discusses Charlie Sheen's Extortion" and you can listen to the clip.

This is odd though because the clip appears to be before the L.A. conference in early June where Sheen appeared.

http://911source.org/research/audio

Check this out!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,204078,00.html

"U.S. Fears Hezbollah Attacks on Americans During Evacuations"

Anybody wanna take bets on Isreal shooting a missle at the Queen Orient cruise ship tomorrow...as it picks up US citizens...and then blaming it on Hezbollah...inviting us into the conflict? Anybody? 5 to 1? Anybody?

World War III, IV, V???

http://mediamatters.org/items/printable/200607140017

Hezbollah

Hezbollah is one of the leading terrorist organizations in the world. It is suspected of having been involved in the 1998 bombings of the American embassies in Africa, and implicated in the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983. Hezbollah clearly falls in the category cited by Secretary Powell of groups “that mean us no good” and “that have conducted attacks previously against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and our allies.” Therefore, any war against terrorism must target Hezbollah. We believe the administration should demand that Iran and Syria immediately cease all military, financial, and political support for Hezbollah and its operations. Should Iran and Syria refuse to comply, the administration should consider appropriate measures of retaliation against these known state sponsors of terrorism.

PNAC-letter to president Bush, 20.01.2001

http://www.newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm

***

No Islamic Republic of Iran, no Hezbollah. No Islamic Republic of Iran, no one to prop up the Assad regime in Syria. No Iranian support for Syria (a secular government that has its own reasons for needing Iranian help and for supporting Hezbollah and Hamas), little state sponsorship of Hamas and Hezbollah. And no Shiite Iranian revolution, far less of an impetus for the Saudis to finance the export of the Wahhabi version of Sunni Islam as a competitor to Khomeini's claim for leadership of militant Islam--and thus no Taliban rule in Afghanistan, and perhaps no Hamas either.

...

For that matter, we might consider countering this act of Iranian aggression with a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. Why wait?

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/433fwb...

***

Wildly disproportionate attack on Lebanon seems like pretext to confront Iran, says Linda McQuaig

J

As Israeli firepower rained down on Lebanon last week, pundits here in the West wasted no time pinning the blame on — Iran.

"Iran and its radical allies are pushing toward war," wrote Washington Post columnist David Ignatius.

Washington defence commentator Edward Luttwak weighed in: "Iran's leaders have apparently decided to reject the Western offer to peacefully settle the dispute over its weapons-grade uranium-enrichment program."

In fact, Iran's leaders haven't rejected the "Western offer;" they've said publicly they will respond to it by Aug. 22. This isn't fast enough however to satisfy Washington, which considers the "offer" more of an ultimatum.

Is it really Iran that is pushing for war? Think about it. Why would Iran want to provoke a war with Israel and the U.S. — both heavily armed nuclear powers — when it has no nuclear weapons itself?

The U.S. and Israel, on the other hand, are very keen to attack Iran. In a recent series of articles in New Yorker magazine, Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh has detailed Washington's plans to attack Iran. Israel has called Iran a "major threat" that "must be stopped" from developing nuclear weapons.

But the U.S. and Israel don't want to look like aggressors. They insist their intentions are purely defensive. Recall that Washington also claimed its invasion of Iraq was purely defensive — to protect itself from Iraq's arsenal of deadly weapons, which, it turned out, didn't exist.

So when Hezbollah militants in southern Lebanon seized two Israeli soldiers last week, a perfect opportunity arose. Since Hezbollah has links to Iran, presto, here was a prima facie case that Iran was gunning for confrontation.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar%2FLayout...

***

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001542.php

***

The Israeli-Hezbollah conflict threatens to drag Syria, Iran and the US into a regional war.

As'ad AbuKhalil, author of Bin Laden, Islam, and America's New 'War on Terrorism' as well as The Battle for Saudi Arabia: Royalty, Fundamentalism, and Global Power, believes the recent violence is a symptom of an international conspiracy under way to enforce UN resolution 1559, which calls for the disarmament of militia groups in Lebanon - a reference to Hezbollah.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D259C343-ED88-4C43-B839-BCEFBED61...

"Anybody wanna take bets on Isreal shooting a missle at the Queen Orient cruise ship tomorrow...as it picks up US citizens...and then blaming it on Hezbollah...inviting us into the conflict? Anybody? 5 to 1? Anybody?"

Webster Tarpley predicted as much this weekend.

It's probably a good Shin Bet.