Recent Headlines
'Rescue Me' to feature 9/11 plot line
CIA Had Mumbai Foreknowledge
Kevin Ryan: Tales From Two Naomis
Ed Asner supports AE911Truth
Jim Fassell pledges $250k to 9/11 Charities
Dr. Bowman's Obama Letter
Did FBI get their man in Bruce Ivins?
Richard Falk: "9/11: More Than Meets The Eye"
A damning admission on the Georgian War
UPDATED: The Facts Speak For Themselves
Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
Japan: Fujita Continues to Challenge 9/11
STJ911 Misrepresented in Draft Bill
Recent Media
9/11 Debate: Jon Gold Vs. Debunker
Howard Zinn's recent comments on 9/11
Penttbom.com video footage
Richard Gage, AIA on Spanish TV
New 9/11 WTC videos posted - 10.31.2008
Peter Dale Scott & Dan Hamburg
Graeme MacQueen & Michael Keefer v. Debunkers
THE MAFIA, THE CIA AND GEORGE BUSH
Michael Wolsey interviews Richard Gage, AIA
Fabled Enemies
The Elephant in the Room
visit 911podcasts.com for more multimedia
Blogads
Asbestos Dangers

Mesothelioma is a dreaded cancer that is nearly always caused by just one factor: asbestos exposure.
FACT: Family members of those who are regularly exposed to high levels of asbestos also have a high risk of developing malignant mesothelioma.
Get the news, get the facts.
Banner Exchange
buy a DVD or book to support this site & 1st responders
User login
9/11 Related Sites
911Research.WTC7.net
9/11 Environmental Action
911review.com
911proof.com
911Truth.org
truthmove.org
911pressfortruth.com
patriotsquestion911.com
911revisited.com
william911.com
Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
International Citizens' Inquiry Into 9/11
truthaction.org
911readingroom.org
9eleven.info
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
deceptiondollar.com
legitgov.org
911omissionreport.com
timetowakeup.net
911tv.org
grandtheftcountry.com
Youth for 9/11 Truth
truth911.net
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
explosive911analysis.com
flight93crash.com
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
supportthetruth.com
mime11.com
physics911.net
911docs.net
nw0.info
investigate911.com
theultimateconspiracy.com
9/11 International Sites
911sandhed.nu
www.i11time.dk
investigar11s.org
911truth.no
911belgium.be
v911truth.org
stoplying.ca
911truth.eu
911truthpeterborough.com
luogocomune.net
911info.se
1192001.dk
11syyskuu.org
serendipity.li
eqgen.nl/aanslagen911
onderzoek911.nl
waarheid911.nl
zapruder.nl
911truthbristol.com
911truthtotnes.com
september11.se
vaken.se
911oz.com
nineeleven.co.uk
hintergrund.de
broeckers.com
thecoop.tv
operation911.de
medienanalyse-international.de
911komplott.de
deepjournal.com
truth4peace.co.uk
911truthskipton.com
wytruth.org.uk
reopen911.info
editionsdemilune.com
cremationofcare.com
Investigate 9/11
9/11 Truth Europe
911.yweb.sk
9/11 Memorial Sites
Alternative News Sites
The Real News.com
Featured Story
TV News Lies
Garlic & Grass
infowars.com
meria.net
whatreallyhappened.com
rinf.com
knowledgedrivenrevolution.com
informationclearinghouse.info
globalresearch.ca
globaloutlook.ca
The Revolutionist
mathaba.net
bushtrash.com
flybynews.com
fracturednews.com
thefairandbalancednews.com
Pentagon plans to station 20,000 troops for 'domestic security'
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Pentagon_plans_to_station_20000_troops_120...
Agence France-Presse
Published: Monday December 1, 2008
The US Department of Defense plans to deploy 20,000 troops nationwide by 2011 to help state and local officials respond to terror or nuclear attacks and emergencies, The Washington Post said Monday.
Citing Pentagon officials, the newspaper said the plan calls for three rapid-reaction forces.
The first 4,700-strong unit, built around an active-duty combat brigade, is based at Fort Stewart, Georgia, and is already available for deployment, according to General Victor Renuart, commander of the US Northern Command, it said.
Two additional groups will later join nearly 80 smaller National Guard and reserve units made up of about 6,000 troops to support local and state authorities nationwide, The Post said.
They will all would be trained to respond to domestic chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high-yield explosive attacks.
The newspaper said that civil liberties groups and libertarians had expressed concern that the plan could undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement.
Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, dedicating 20,000 troops to domestic response -- a nearly sevenfold increase in five years -- "would have been extraordinary to the point of unbelievable," Paul McHale, assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, said in remarks last month noted by the Post. But the recognition that civilian authorities may be overwhelmed in a catastrophe [Hurricane Katrina might be used as an example] prompted "a fundamental change in military culture."
"The Pentagon's plan calls for three rapid-reaction forces to be ready for emergency response by September 2011," the Post added. "The first 4,700-person unit, built around an active-duty combat brigade based at Fort Stewart, Ga., was available as of Oct. 1, said Gen. Victor E. Renuart Jr., commander of the U.S. Northern Command."
"If funding continues, two additional teams will join nearly 80 smaller National Guard and reserve units made up of about 6,000 troops in supporting local and state officials nationwide," they continued. "All would be trained to respond to a domestic chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high-yield explosive attack, or CBRNE event, as the military calls it."
Actually...
A hint was mentioned on 11/25...
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
Alex Jones
AJ has been right all along.
I must agree. It appears that martial law is coming.
Alex Jones is right on this one.
It may not take another false flag event to get the country into chaos. It may just be that the inevitable financial crash and resulting unemployment will bring about the kind of chaos that they need to "justify" martial law.
Alex Jones on Coast to Coast AM - 12/1/08
talking about the 'domestic security force'...
part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZhfPZnCPCE
part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQmbpZ1vUl4
part 3
To be a little optimistic,
it is simply not possible to control 300 million angry Americans with 20,000 troops. (That's 15,000 Americans per troop.) But they will try.
Also, we do not have 300 million angry citizens. Yet.
And I too find Alex Jones to be spot on these days.
You don't have to control all 300 million
Americans are an especially fearful bunch. Just go after 1 million in a very public way and you've attained the 50:1 ratio needed for effective counter-insurgency. Most will do their all best to not be in that group.
Mercenaries
One cannot leave out the large number of mercenaries hired by the State Department, some of whom seem to want to build training facilities from coast to coast.
Private armies created with taxpayer dollars.
We'll need 160 million for a general strike to counter them non-violently (or as non-violently as possible).
There will be attempts to identify, isolate and neutralize "leaders", this is why we all have to be our own leaders, and the best leaders are also good listeners.
Love is a verb, brothers and sisters, let's get busier!
The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.
Yes
mercenaries are a very bad (and for that matter, dangerous) thing. No wonder they call them 'contractors'. These can include foreigners, who may be far more willing to open fire on hapless Americans.
A general strike would be great. There's no way they could deal with mass actions. 'Diffuse' action, like a small group on every streetcorner, would be far harder to put down than one massive protest.
The only good thing about the economic situation is that it may finally motivate enough people to make this possible.
just finished "Black Bush"...
Solution:
and join the organization putting on the Boston event as well as www.CampaignForLiberty.com
Alex Jones has been all over this
You're right. More and more Alex has warned of this. I've become a big fan and listen daily. He's had some great quest on latley. I feel I'm ahead of the news before I read it in my local rag. Keep up the great work Alex.
it this what Colin Powel and others were trying to warn Obama ?
John A MITCHELL
Herblay FRANCE
bonjour ,
it this what Colin Powel and others were trying to warn is going to happen on the 21st or 22nd of January ?
http://www.911blogger.com/node/18262
http://www.911blogger.com/node/18225
http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.moz...
http://www.911blogger.com/node/18238
Yours John
Note that
the military will receive training to deal with chemical, biological or nuclear attacks, but the public will not. I guess they figure the public will be dead, or they want them dead. The military are just clean up crews. Why is the public not being trained to deal with these attacks?
see also
Glenn Greenwald on this...
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/12/02/healy/index.html
And on ABC? Our old friend Jerome Hauer
preps us for a "small nuclear event".
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=6378675&page=1
"Jerry Hauer, one of the nation's leading experts on biological and chemical terrorism and an ABC News consultant, supports the Pentagon's plan and says that those who criticize it need to face reality that any future attack on the United States will be unlike any other the country has faced.
"I'd rather enhance state and local personnel's training, but having said that I also believe that in the event of a catastrophic event like a nuclear attack it becomes very clear that the National Guard in most states would not be enough and that troops would clearly be needed," said Hauer.
He added that the 15,000 number might be conservative.
Hauer said that through exercises in various cities, including one three years ago with the Joint Chiefs of Staffs in which they reacted to a mock terrorist attack, he is certain that at least 100,000 additional troops would be necessary in the event of a biological or nuclear attack.
In the event of an attack, Hauer said that military troops would be vital in helping move injured patients, providing medical treatment and securing the city where the incident occurred.
"And you've not only got to keep roads open to get aid in but you've got to keep roads open so that people can get out, and that's very labor intensive," he said. "That's where the military plays a very important role."
"Certainly there are valid concerns [about this plan], but at some point we need to look at the reality here and see that a lot of people are going to die because we don't have the resources in place in any state or local government to cope with one of these disasters," said Hauer.
"There is not one city in the country that is even close to prepared for dealing with even a small nuclear event."
“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson











Immediately Following The Mumbai Attacks - Interesting
Hard to ignore the timing.
Note also how a regional "terror" event in India seemed to "coincidentally" occur during a major U.S. family holiday, when much of the traveling public will be passing through additionally heightened TSA airport security and the rest would be home watching it all unfold on cable TV networks.
The latest "problem, reaction, solution" type psy-op?