my view is that Alex Jones (and the NWO, Globalization crowd) are doing a great job on false flag terror and police state issues. Where they go off the rails is in trying to fit the current reality into a John Birch Society ideology of ultra nationalism and fear of "foreigners". Capitalism has been a world system dominated by the big corporate interests since 1880's. There is nothing NEW about it. Bretton Woods, WTO, G 7, G 20, all that are efforts to manage and harmonize this system - ultimately they fail. What we are witnessing now is a terminal collapse of that global system. But, I'm not saying we all need to agree on that. I'm just saying lets stick to proving the false nature of the "war on terror" and thus free ourselves from the tyranny of the capitalist state bent on maintaining a sick system. Then of course we will need to build a new order, but that's the next phase.

Jones has done admirable work on 9-11, and for that reason I recommend him to others researching 9-11. But his vague term, "new world order," as well as his apparent lack of knowledge of capitalism being a world system since the late 19th century, disagree with me. Nationalism is NOT the answer, it is part of the problem.

of the problem - replacing religion in the twentieth century as the main form of ruling class manipulation - bringing about two world holocausts and more. Jones confuses the elites phony "internationalism" with genuine human (proletarian) internationalism. IMO

My two cents:

Recently when I confronted Tariq Ali ...I did several things in preparation...When I entered the theatre I positioned myself in a seat closest to a mike that I knew would be used. My plan was to get in line asap once Q&A was opened up by the moderator for the audience, Second I prepared a question ..."a question that is with-out any commentary of my own " and one that would require a thoughtful answer rather than an easyly shoved off to the side answer......At times and days before an event I would discuss this with others how to put together the best question to ask (plan of attack for the best results). My first plan with Tariq did not work so I quickly went into an unplanned B, by confronting Tariq during a book signing. I learned quickly that one must also be prepared with a plan B and C as well... One screw-up I did was I accidentally covered the mike with my hand when I asked Tariq my prepared question...Having a plan and a plan and a back-up plan I'm learning has the best results. I think Ottawa did a great effort here and now is a good time to evaluate how to do better next time...

I liked how you had two camera's set up and on opposite sides to this small room. Did you have others with prepared questions? Ive been to several Liberal events, two with Stephane Dion and I can tell you judging from the applause Martin had his liberal cronies in the room...this can be countered by having several of your own people situated in various parts of the room. Recently at a Rally presentation for Omar Khadr we had 8 members of Edmonton 911 truth on hand and although they did not allow for Q&A, our group managed handing out 100s of DVDs in a 700 crowd capacity. I guess that was a good plan B.

live n learn, our mistakes are our best teacher! remember too, Paul Martin is a politician who was once our nations prime minister, he didn't get that far by not knowing first how to duck the difficult questions.