Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Blogads

Loose Change: An American Coup DVD

User login

RSS Feeds

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox


Justin Martell and Eric Jackman Interview Bob Barr

( Home » blogs » jamartellxiv's blog » Justin Martell and... )
Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
Submitted by jamartellxiv on Sun, 10/26/2008 - 7:22pm.
|

On Tuesday, October 21st, 2008, Former Congressman and Libertarian Presidential Candidate Bob Barr appeared on my on campus television show that I host with Eric Jackman. I have uploaded the interview to YouTube in three parts:

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

www.FormYourOwn.org

» login to post comments | 2 points

9/11 Q&A in part two.

In the second half of part 2.

Submitted by Reprehensor on Sun, 10/26/2008 - 8:40pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Justin...

You wear the best clothes. Good job guys.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Submitted by Jon Gold on Sun, 10/26/2008 - 8:59pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Stooge

Justine & Eric, you guys are great and all that jive but you certainly laid off this obvious stooge. You came across almost like gatekeepers. I know that you are not gatekeepers. I also know you are aspiring to be professional, but certainly you could have had a sharper edge, put him on the spot. Although, to be honest, you lost me after part 2 so I can't honestly say you didn't come around in part 3. I suspect you didn't. With the utmost respect, overall, you guys are great Patriots, but this time out you missed the ball. Better luck next time. Please don't take this criticism the wrong way. I am simply trying to be honest so that next time out you might cultivate your skills better. You guys have passion and talent and I'd hate to see it get watered down.

Submitted by greenback on Mon, 10/27/2008 - 5:50am.
» login to post comments | 1 point

I disagree 100%. I think

I disagree 100%.

I think the two of you did a great job.
There's a fine line between being professional and courteous and being out of hand and the Jackmans and Justin have always done a good job in being the definition of that line. Great job guys!

Regards,
Mark in Philly
*** DONATE TODAY!!! ***
http://www.FealGoodFoundation.com

Submitted by SeekTheTruth911 on Mon, 10/27/2008 - 10:09am.
» login to post comments | 2 points

Thanks, Mark. I respect

Thanks, Mark. I respect Congressman Barr and the point of the interview was to go over his positions as a presidential candidate. We didn't have him on our show to debate about the melting point of anti-matter. My goal was to provide to voters a window into Bob Barr's positions and ideas, and I succeeded in doing just that.

Justin A. Martell
www.FormYourOwn.org
jamartell.blogspot.com

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

Submitted by jamartellxiv on Mon, 10/27/2008 - 12:57pm.
» login to post comments | -1 points

I don't respect Barr

How can you Justin? The guy is a conservative who happens to lean libertarian (definition:one who believes that a person should be free to do as they want as long as they are not harming others) on a few issues.

He is giving a bad name to the LP and confusing the a lot of people on what libertarian is (it is not some slighty trendier form of conservatism--it has nothing to do with conservatism!).

There's no point in having an LP that doesn't stand staunchly for a pure libertarian position—there's two other parties that have plenty of room for people who mostly believe in freedom, "except for this, or that, or what about that?"
And if Bob is successful in turning the LP into the Republican Party-lite why should anyone bother voting for it, since the Republican Party already exists?

Submitted by patrick on Mon, 10/27/2008 - 1:47pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

So should I have treated him

So should I have treated him in the manner that representatives from the 9/11 truth movement are treated by media pundits who don't agree? Shout him down? Talk over him? As I said, I was providing a window into Barr's position on the issues surrounding this election. If it helped you to form an opinion of him, whether it be negative, I succeeded.

Justin A. Martell
www.FormYourOwn.org
jamartell.blogspot.com

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

Submitted by jamartellxiv on Mon, 10/27/2008 - 3:25pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Sibel Edmonds!

Justin, I think you guys did just fine.

However, when you asked about a new investigation and he replied that he wanted some kind of evidence or a good reason for a new investigation you should have immediately brought up FBI whistle blower Sibel Edmonds, who is being prevented from naming high level Americans who were involved with the crimes of 9/11/01, along with many other criminal and treasonous activities.

Keep up the good work!

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Submitted by LeftWright on Mon, 10/27/2008 - 5:57pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Thanks. Yeah, Sibel would

Thanks. Yeah, Sibel would have been great to bring up. I usually write my questions out but didn't this time around and am not as good off the cuff.

Justin A. Martell
www.FormYourOwn.org
jamartell.blogspot.com

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

Submitted by jamartellxiv on Mon, 10/27/2008 - 6:02pm.
» login to post comments | 2 points

Hehe,

no of course you should have respected him in the interview.

What I mean is that you shouldn't respect how he tries to sell himself as a libertarian (when he is in reality a washed-up conservative)!

Submitted by patrick on Mon, 10/27/2008 - 11:40pm.