Ms Wilner.
I read your comments about relegating conspiracy theorists to the extreme ideological fringes of our society. I’m wondering if that includes credible intelligent educated people who question the events of 9/11?
In the 1930s for example if courageous people questioned the government or their motives, they were arrested, jailed and worse. Same goes for Pinochet’s Chile, Stalin’s Russia and many other authoritarian tyrannical regimes.
Today, if people dare to question the Bush government or the official findings of the 9/11 Commission, they are labeled “conspiracy theorists. Obviously we have come a long way. Thankfully.
We are incredibly fortunate in our time to have the freedom to ask these questions, no matter how uncomfortable or controversial. As for me, I really don’t know who is responsible for the crimes of 9/11 but I can’t easily dismiss the work of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth or Patriots for 9/11 Truth or any of the many other credible groups around the world who are asking for a new impartial and complete investigation into the events of that day..
The way I see it is, if such an investigation can prove the so-called “conspiracy theorists” wrong, they will quietly go away and live with the ignominy of that demeaning label.
On the other hand, if those supporting the official story are wrong, they will have to live with the fact that they are no different than supporters of Hitler and other tyrants, not to mention those who deny the holocaust. I’m not suggesting the crimes or the times are the same, only that the principle of supporting state terrorism is similar.
Thank you,
(Me)