This guy is a tool making money writing books, clearly not at all interested with the truth. I'm going to write him a letter telling him what I think. Join me.

If I was CIA and admitted I never heard of the "dancing Israelis" I'd feel like a real dumbass. How embarrassing!!

Sound bites! All that matters is sound bites! I always love what WeAreChange does, and indeed, I am, by comparison, a couch potato unworthy of the grease vat in any of the greasiest of greasy spoon restaurants in this great land of ours.

However, I must grade this truth action a B-minus because it chooses too subtle a point, forgetting that Shenon is not the audience, the sleeping masses are. Remember the elevator pitch, a 30-second statement during which you nail your message to the wall. In the first ten seconds you introduce the hidden opportunity, next ten seconds you convince your listener that you are prepared with a plan to seize value from that opportunity, and next ten seconds you present real numbers that makes obvious how the listener can participate in the rewards.

Truth actions must present only the most convincing topics: simple, fact-based or physical evidence points that cannot be refuted. Stay away from "dancing Israeliis." What in the world is convincing about that? To the masses, I mean. Remember, these are our gentle, but ignorant friends; attract them with sweet morsals of truth, not complex, bitter, hard-textured pits that only a sophisticated connaisseur could appreciate. Stay away from "apparently interrupted Israeli false-flag terror attempt on the Mexican Parliament." What the hell is that?!! Nothing could be less convincing to the 60-second viewer than that. Please, never bring that up as an introductory point ever again. This is all about introducing people ... nicely, of course.

Get real, get simple, get convincing. Here's what works:
1. Evidence of thermite. Know the facts, state the unavoidable conclusion. Done.
2. BBC and CNN reporting WTC7 collapse before it actually happened. Peter Jennings obviously mis-cued as well. Done.
3. 400+ architects and engineers are calling for investigation. Get AE911truth into the spotlight. Done.
4. No previous high-rise collapse due to fire ever before, or since. No physical reason to think that a chunk of a top of a building would obliterate 80,000 tons of structural steel designed to resist it. Try this: "Imagine making a pile of nine junk cars, then dropping a tenth on top of it, would you expect the total destruction of all ten cars?" No. Done.
5. Two senators who argued to slow down the passage of the Patriot Act, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, were targets of weaponized anthrax made by the US Government.
6. War games were happening that very day on 9/11, dealing specifically with jetliners flying into buildings. FEMA was in place in NYC the night before 9/11. Why was FEMA there already?
7. Why did Solicitor General Ted Olsen lie? Cell phone calls from 30,000 feet were impossible then, and now, with any land-based cell tower. Ted Olson spent 20 minutes telling Larry King all about such a call from his wife on AA 77, but he contradicted himself repeatedly and couldn't get his story straight, and now American Airlines, the FBI, and Pentagon historians are all trying to pretend he never said that.
8. Say, "What do you think about the many bizarre contradictions outlined in David Ray Griffin's book, 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press?" Say, "Are you interested in knowing what these inconsistencies are?" Gets David Ray Griffin's name into the spotlight.
9. The Pakistani intelligence agency, ISI, close ally of the CIA, wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta just prior to September 11th. Say, "Why do you think about that?"

Only the most potent information will increase the numbers.

Did I mention that WeAreChange deserves our profound admiration? :)

Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

I believe it is on pg 266 of his book, talking about notes Lynn Cheney and Scooter Libbey were taking while in the bunker and the decision was made being by Cheney to authorize a shoot down order, Shenon says Libby's notes for 10:12-10:18 read (words to the effect of, I don't have the book in front of me) "Plane 60 miles out, engage...?"

My question, what plane? Whatever hit the Pentagon did so at about 9:38, and 93 supposedly crashed (was shot down) at 10:02. Shenon doesn't question this timeline. What plane was 60 miles out at 10:12 to 10:18?

I believe these are compelling areas of investigation but don't you think we need to punch up the impact of truth actions after 7 years of public dismissal?

Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.