I wish I was on the east coast to attend this. Looks like a really fun event! =) Great artwork on the flyer too!!

Sander's talk is going to enlighten the DC masses who've had their blinders on for far too long. I'm looking forward to it, Sander.

Controlled demolition has been researched incredibly for 7 years now, with amazing results. We got lucky with Anthrax coming out when it did as the stories started coming into the mainstream since January of this year with the Hit-story Channel actually doing an episode with scientists calling it the unmentionable, "inside job." There are many additional areas of research that need to be focused on that 9/11 researchers in general shy away from as a whole for fear of attack or ridicule, all across the blog spectrum, such as Shanksville, the "crash" into the Five-Sided Death Star in Arlington, the money trail of the Put Options and Richard Grove's extensive financial research, the Patsies and the Able Danger program - another one mostly forgotten by the 9/11 movement.

Researchers don't have to stop researching the Towers and don't need to agree on all of the other aspects of the other topics, but they need to at least focus some of their attentions to these other neglected areas with as much energy and enthusiasm as most of us put into our research of the crimes of that day when we finally "got it." Without discussion, you can't flush out the good research from the bad. There's a reason why the infamous shadowy "They" keep distracting us with the easy CD issue, because they have a fall back plan with the towers, which they can't do with places such as the Pentagram, er, I mean Pentagon, with Anthrax or the money trail. Its when people try to keep you from researching other areas in any way that you need to look really hard at those areas, with the intensity you never have had up to at that point, and ask why they are trying to keep you from it. When they start pulling up Iron Mountain size caches of old correspondence or quotes most likely taken out of context, or reference their own blog sites of information as undeniable proof of how bad the person they are attacking are, raise those Red Flags high!

It's very important to recognize what they are doing, when they attack you personally, focusing on that rather than the actual information you present, to use as a distraction to bog you down instead of researching - that's when you know you are on to something.

Never believe anything until it is officially denied - or labeled a "conspiracy theory."