Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

The Environmental Impact Of 9/11

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.


Please go here to learn more.

Please spread this around...

Vote it up, etc... this would be a huge accomplishment if they got this. Upwards of $13B could be made available to them. Granted, given today's dollar value, that's only worth about $1.43, but at least it's something. :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hys3PlNP42A


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

another comment

Once again, I'm going to offer you some constructive criticism that you can feel free to ignore.

Think back over all the viral videos you've ever seen- how many of them relied almost entirely on text to make their point (i.e., a picture or two, maybe music, but mostly text flashing on the screen)? I can't remember any, but either way, look at 99% of the most popular videos and pay attention to what they have in common: they all show you something, instead of telling you.

Just using this current video as an example- on the surface, your goal is obviously to communicate that the EPA (et al) said over and over again that the air was safe, but they were wrong, and now people are dying. You direct people to http://historycommons.org to learn more, which is the right thing to do, but you're not really adding much value over what people can find there.

Why not show an actual timeline? Nothing fancy- just a line with labels for each year. Then, after each event is displayed, you add a marking of some sort to the timeline. You wouldn't need to label those markings, because all of the events are so similar. In the end, the viewer would be able to see, in one glance, exactly how many markings are on that timeline & how far apart they are. That image will stick in people's minds.

Then, for the payoff, "1,000s are sick and dying", why not flash a few pictures of suffering first responders up there, in addition to the text? You could even add it as the final dot on the timeline before showing the pictures. Again, the images are what will stick in people's minds. Don't tell them if you can show them (or in a situation like this, do both).

Just my $.02. Oh, and the only reason I'm even sharing this with you is because I've seen you make comments along the lines of, "there's no reason why this video shouldn't go viral".

Thank you for your criticism...

But it was Mark Peters that said, "There's no reason why this video shouldn't go viral."

Also, please try to understand that you're talking to someone fididdling around in iMovie who every once in a while gets lucky when a movie pops out.


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

my mistake

My mistake, regarding the 'viral' quote.

As for iMovie, nothing I mentioned in my previous message is outside the realm of what iMovie can do. In fact, you could even create a presentation in Keynote (part of iWork; free trial available somewhere) with everything I mentioned, except maybe the music, and then save the presentation in Quicktime format. Worst case, you could add the music after the fact.

Anyway, the underlying point of my previous message was to differentiate between visual and written communication. The suggested timeline was just something that came to mind - it was more of an example than anything else.