No that was just a reprint of the Reuters smear by that zionist shill girl called Jill Searjant which all over now..

But the FT run it under more fair headline (content was the same)..

Ok, but where is the link to the FT headline?

get ready for the final report of the chemical analysis st911.org, once that comes out the shits gonna hit the fan for sure.

ALL we need to prove is a controlled demolition, after that it's a crumbling house of sand.

we're almost there.

Corey Rowe interview on iraq:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2399257667872916789&q=loose+chan...

the establishment Dems are flocking to KOS for a reason. hes "safe". fuck KOS and C&L.

The Financial Times article is there but is for subscribers only: http://search.ft.com/search/article.html?id=060626002970&query=tarpley&v...

Alan Colmes Gets Calls On The 9/11 Inside Job from John Conner from The Resistance Manifesto .com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uierjkfRdBE&search=alan%20colmes

I think the problem with Markos is that he believes that if the Dems can retake congress and the white house, everything that's wrong with our current political system will be resolved (likewise he doesn't want voters to be turned-off by 9/11 'consperacy' charges). Fair enough.

Unfortunetly, Kos doesn't "get it". He doesn't understand that the whole system has become a farce and that Democratic politicians are just as guilty as covering up the truth as Republicans and the mainstream media. Oh well. It's his site, and he HAS done his part in getting thinking and fired up...

clearly he doesnt "get it", and hes so taken with the establishment courting him right now hes not ever gonna "get it".that is, if hes not already fully comprimised.(as some suspect, based on his military ties,the fact he used to be a republican, and he has admitted that he "almost" worked for the CIA.)

Was the Invasion of Iraq A Jewish Conspiracy? [no]
http://www.gregpalast.com/was-the-invasion-of-iraq-a-jewish-conspiracy

ultimately, after watching the kid, i think your right, hes just an ignorant ass that loves the attention hes getting. i personally dont think hes CIA or anything, but i cant blame people for thinking that.

Markos should be considered an enemy.

This doesn't look like it is going to cover much of the whitewash, but Bretweiser has a book coming out in September.
http://www.twbookmark.com/books/22/0446579327/index.html

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060626/ap_on_re_us/attacks_health

On the Front Page of Yahoo News - Right Now

Way Cool !!

A 10,000-page investigative report by the National Institute of Standards and Technology held that jet-fuel fires led to the twin towers' collapse.

even without prof. jones' chemical analysis the NIST report is proven to be false by
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/BilliardBalls.html
_______________-

That 9/11 health issues are being given some attention is certainly helpful to the cause of the 9/11 Truth movement. But let's not characterize anything that involves genuine human suffering, especially of the first responders, as "cool"- it comes across as unseemly and heartless, even though that's not your intention.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060.../ attacks_health

On the Front Page of Yahoo News - Right Now

Way Cool !!
TRUTH SEEKER | 06.26.06 - 4:01 pm | #
================

mentions Les Jamesom and NY911.org !!!

Gosh, I am Very Sorry. I realized the error in that a nano second after I sent it.

It's good to get some MSM news on this important topic, and my heart goes out to those who are suffering because they took the time to go help out at Ground Zero.

Corey Rowe interview on iraq:
http://video.google.com/videopla...&q=loose+change
Anonymous | 06.26.06 - 3:14 pm | #
- - - - - -

this is very good !! take the time to watch Corey

you can really see it now....

gradually things are coming around

Washington Post
"The theories have been derided by critics as wild and far-fetched."

Reuters
"The theories, derided by critics as wild and far-fetched, have mostly been confined to the Internet, talk radio and the alternative press."

I hate the Washington Post.

In some earlier thread Jon linked to the BBC documentary "Why the Twin Towers Fell". I went on to watch it.

Here are some of the problems with it.

It does not discuss any of the evidence pointing to controlled demolition (the very short collapse times, the symmetry of the collapses, the unprecedented degree of pulverization, the eyewitness accounts, etc.).

It does not even mention the destruction of WTC 7.

It notes that few scientists were able to examine the steel debris before it was sold as scrap to the Far East, but does not discuss why hundreds of scientists did not meticulously examine the steel instead.

The demonstration at the end was quite funny in that the structure set up by the scientists toppled instead of "pancaking". ;-)

In the documentary a WTC employee was interviewed who saw the plane coming towards the tower he was in. Aren't there many other such eyewitness accounts? And what about Pavel Hlava's video, for example?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9sM7N1Hz9k

I really think that the no plane theories need to be dropped.