Recent Headlines
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Recent Media
They will not control us.
Confronting 9/11 commissioner John Lehman
Madeline Albright confronted on Bilderberg and New World Order Crimes including 9/11
WeAreChangeLA Confronts Amy Goodman On Alleged Progressive Media's Blackout And Smear Campaign Of Real 9/11 Investigation
Dr. Graeme MacQueen on Myth and Foreign Policy
US poet JerryMazza RussiaToday August 02, 2009
War on Terror: Expenditures
New DVD - Steven Jones: Nano-Thermite
MI5 officer visited Morocco three times while Binyam Mohamed was tortured
Real Time problems with Bill Maher?
WeAreChangeLA delivers scientific proof of 9/11 TREASON
Richard Gage, AIA and AE911Truth Staff at the Recent AIA Convention in Washington DC
Russia Today covers Richard Gage's efforts in Washington D.C.
AUDIO: Jonathan Cole on WENG Radio, Englewood Fl.
AUDIO: Truth Action Ottawa interviews Cosmos from truthaction.org
VIDEO: Star Wars & False Flag Terrorism 2.0
VIDEO: Annie Machon and Barrie Zwicker
AUDIO: Peter Dale Scott on "Diet Soap"
AUDIO: AE911Truth on KGO AM Radio
VIDEO: Jonathan Kay, "Journalist", comes back for more 9/11 Truth
VIDEO: Dr. Steven Jones at UC Davis - May1, 2009
VIDEO: Richard Gage AIA on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, CA
VIDEO: AE911Truth “Companion” Edition 10-Minute WTC 7 Video
AUDIO: Visibility 9-11 Welcomes John-Michael Talboo and Stewart Bradley of Debunking the Debunkers
Banner Exchange
User login
9/11 Related Sites
911Research.WTC7.net
911speakout.org
911review.com
world911truth.org
911proof.com
truthmove.org
911pressfortruth.com
patriotsquestion911.com
csi911.info
911revisited.com
william911.com
911debunkers.blogspot.com
Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
International Citizens' Inquiry Into 9/11
truthaction.org
911readingroom.org
911reports
9eleven.info
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
deceptiondollar.com
legitgov.org
911omissionreport.com
911tv.org
pnacitizen.org
thedebate.org
grandtheftcountry.com
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
flight93crash.com
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
mime11.com
physics911.net
911docs.net
9/11 International Sites
torontochange.com
911sandhed.nu
www.i11time.dk
reopen911.info
investigar11s.org
911truth.no
911belgium.be
v911truth.org
stoplying.ca
911truth.eu
911truthpeterborough.com
luogocomune.net
911info.se
1192001.dk
11syyskuu.org
serendipity.li
eqgen.nl/aanslagen911
onderzoek911.nl
waarheid911.nl
zapruder.nl
911truthbristol.com
911truthtotnes.com
september11.se
vaken.se
911oz.com
nineeleven.co.uk
hintergrund.de
broeckers.com
thecoop.tv
operation911.de
medienanalyse-international.de
911komplott.de
deepjournal.com
truth4peace.co.uk
911truthskipton.com
wytruth.org.uk
editionsdemilune.com
cremationofcare.com
Investigate 9/11
9/11 Truth Europe
911.yweb.sk
9/11 Memorial Sites
News and Blogs
Wikileaks
Project Censored
Freedoms Phoenix
Cryptome
Truth Alliance Network
Dandelion Salad
The New American Dream
George Washington
The Raw Story
The Real News.com
The Daily Dirt
Better Bad News
Featured Story
infowars.com
meria.net
maxkeiser.com
Ignorance Isnt Bliss
rinf.com
Public Policy News and Research
informationclearinghouse.info
globalresearch.ca
mathaba.net
flybynews.com
Dandelion Salad
Mark Crispin Miller
Pimpin' Turtle
American's Journey
damien911.blogspot.com
Rosie.com
Questioning the War on Terrorism
culhavoc.blogsome.com
arabesque911.blogspot.com
dailypaul.com
Justice Or A Joke?
Jon Gold
7/18/2008
Here is an excerpt from a statement from the September 11th Advocates with regards to the Military Tribunals taking place at Guantanamo.
Prosecuting these men within a system that is secretive in nature and lacking in due process, and which uses evidence tainted by questionable interrogation methods and possibly even torture, is a dangerous endeavor.Here is information supporting the claim that the military tribunals are "secretive in nature":
9/11 Trial: Don't Expect Another Nuremberg [CBSNews, 2/12/2008]
Military officials said all the right things Monday - that there would be very little CLASSIFIED evidence introduced against the men and that they would be afforded most of the same rights as accused U.S. soldiers - but it is unclear as I write this whether in fact the procedures ballyhooed now are materially different from the procedures that have been challenged before and that remain legally dubious even today.
Gitmo tribunal rules limit evidence disclosures [Miami Herald, 4/3/2008]
"We can't disclose CLASSIFIED information. We can't disclose privacy information," the war-court legal advisor, Brig. Gen. Thomas Hartmann, said in an interview.
[...]
In a November response to a written protest by attorneys for The New York Times and other news organizations, the commission deputy legal advisor, Michael Chapman, explained it this way: Military judges are charged with "the delicate balance of providing for the public interest in the commission proceedings, protecting the rights of the accused, maintaining witness privacy, securing CLASSIFIED or sensitive information and ensuring the interests of justice are appropriately respected and protected."
Bin Laden's driver can send notes to detainees [Miami Herald, 4/30/2008]
Guards have isolated 16 so-called high-value detainees under top secret circumstances somewhere on this base; to speak to them, their lawyers need special CLASSIFIED status.
[...]
Specifically, Murphy said: "We are worried about highly CLASSIFIED information and the manipulation that these detainees could undertake to thwart this commissions process."
Delay sought in Guantanamo 9/11 case [Associated Press, 5/19/2008]
Defense lawyer and Army Maj. Jon Jackson said his team does not have enough access to his client, Mustafa al-Hawsawi, or to secure facilities where CLASSIFIED material must be reviewed.
[...]
Defense lawyers are also crippled because they have been assigned no authorized location, at Guantanamo or in Washington, to review CLASSIFIED information, Jackson said in his motion.
"Counsel have no place to store work product, discuss CLASSIFIED material or prepare for their case while in Cuba," Jackson wrote, adding that construction of a secure facility in Washington — which was to have been completed by the end of 2007 — has not even begun.
DellaVedova insisted that defense lawyers have secure facilities at Guantanamo and in Washington to review the information.
Jackson asked the judge to delay his client's arraignment until the government provides a security clearance for Sosbee, supplies the defense team with secure facilities for CLASSIFIED material and allows "for defense preparation of this case." More time is also needed to obtain a civilian attorney for al-Hawsawi if he wants one, Jackson said.
Defense lawyers for 9/11 detainees seek to delay arraignments [jurist.law.pitt.edu, 5/20/2008]
They allege the US government has interfered with the defendants' rights to counsel by refusing to provide facilities for the review of CLASSIFIED evidence or to grant security clearances to attorneys assisting in the defense.
Alleged 9/11 plotters face military tribunal [Associated Press, 6/4/2008]
Hartmann insisted the trials will be fair even though the evidence may include coerced statements and material so CLASSIFIED that even the defendants can't see it or challenge it.
9/11 suspect: 'I wish to be martyred' [CNN, 6/5/2008]
Kohlmann announced at the start of the session that at least part of the detainees' statements would be CLASSIFIED and the judge would block out audio.
9/11 mastermind calls for death penalty [AFP, 6/5/2008]
"Any statement by any of the detainees is presumptively CLASSIFIED," Kohlmann said.
Lawyer seeks clearance for 9/11 defendant [Associated Press, 6/17/2008]
A military attorney for one of the Sept. 11 defendants at Guantanamo Bay predicted on Tuesday the Pakistani would at best see only a sliver of CLASSIFIED evidence and would be convicted in what amounts to "a top secret trial."
[...]
Mizer noted that if the defendant lacks a security clearance, his defense team will be unable to share CLASSIFIED evidence with him unless and until the judge allows it to be discussed in open court.
[...]
However, some CLASSIFIED information presented to the jury and the defendants may be censored or summarized, Hartmann said, touching on a key element in whether America's first war-crimes trials since the World War II era are seen as fair.
[...]
Mizer said that on four occasions while defending another Guantanamo detainee, he himself was barred from seeing CLASSIFIED documents the government presented to a military judge, even though the Navy lawyer has security clearance.
[...]
Hartmann acknowledged that on rare occasions, defense lawyers might be denied access to CLASSIFIED information presented to the judge, saying that the military trials must "balance national security interests with the accused needing to see the information."
US to carry on military trials at Guantanamo despite ruling [AFP, 6/24/2008]
Details of the decision were not immediately available because it involved CLASSIFIED information, according to the appeals court statement.
Defendant in 9/11 plot denies he was coerced to reject representation by military lawyers [Associated Press, 7/9/2008]
But Kohlmann told al-Hawsawi that he would not have the security clearances required to see some of the CLASSIFIED evidence against him.
9/11 suspect to defend self at Guantanamo trial [Associated Press, 7/9/2008]
The judge, Marine Col. Ralph Kohlmann, said Ali's situation will only become more difficult and tried to persuade him to accept his lawyers. Without a security clearance, he said Ali will not have access to CLASSIFIED material during the death penalty trial.
"The way the rules are you will not have access to CLASSIFIED material to assist you in your case," he said.
Judge urges 9/11 suspects to accept legal help [LATimes, 7/10/2008]
A military judge Wednesday strongly advised two accused co-conspirators in the Sept. 11 attacks not to represent themselves in their upcoming trial because their defense would suffer from several factors, including a lack of access to the CLASSIFIED evidence that the government plans to use against them.
[...]
"All of these things are usually done in a trial better by a lawyer with special knowledge and experience with the laws and procedures," Kohlmann said in separate comments to both men. "In addition, you will not be given access to CLASSIFIED materials before trial because you lack the security clearances, [which] would severely hinder any effort by you to represent yourself."
[...]
The judge noted that prosecutors had filed a motion the day before the hearing in which they too urged the judge to warn the accused about the hardships they would encounter by representing themselves, especially the lack of access to CLASSIFIED evidence.
[..]
In the past, military commission officials have said that the so-called high-value detainees would get access to the CLASSIFIED information gathered against them, but only once the trial was underway.
9/11 plotters tell Guantanamo judge of legal woes [LATimes, 7/11/2008]
Navy Capt. Prescott L. Prince and civilian lawyers David Nevin and Scott McKay said, for instance, that the government has decreed that anything Mohammed says or writes is considered CLASSIFIED, essentially prohibiting them from using it in court filings or in investigative efforts aimed at determining whether he is guilty of the terrorist acts for which he has claimed responsibility.
Alleged 9/11 mastermind may testify in Hamdan's trial [Miami Herald, 7/18/2008]
'The CIA, which had kept Mohammed and the other alleged 9/11 conspirators in secret detention until turning them over to the military, has insisted that their former captives can talk only to people at Guantanamo with special CLASSIFIED security clearances. But Mizer already holds the needed clearances.
In that same statement from the September 11th Advocates, they proclaim that, "it is imperative to prove that these six detainees are indeed the guilty parties."
Given that these military tribunals are so "secretive," how on Earth do they expect us to believe that they have proven those being held at Guantanamo are "indeed the guilty parties?"
Is this Justice or a joke? If it is the latter, it is not funny.
good collection, helps put these "trials" in perspective.
This is a travesty of justice that should be a warning and wake-up call to Americans, but it also makes me more sure the future is bright; the Bush administration has painted itself into a corner; they seem as deathly afraid of the accused having fair and public trials as they are of the Jersey Girls, but they can't do anything about it, even though we're likely under COG. There's no way these tribunals will be seen as legit in the international community, or in the eyes of any Americans who are paying attention. The world is waiting for Bush to leave office, and he's destroyed our economy, the dollar, US influence and standing in the world- the US will have to cooperate and share more- thanks to Bush's selfish, arrogant bullying.
I suppose a dirty bomb attack or multiple ones on US cities could change everything even more; but i don't think "they" can feel confident about maintaining martial law, even if they shut down food supplies and round up the million political dissidents on their "terrorist" watch list; what then will they look like in the eyes of the world, and to Americans? Elite wealth and power will suffer as a result, if there's another attack- which Brzezinski essentially warned Congress might be faked. 1 out 3 Americans know 9/11 was an inside job; can they be sure the public will accept answers without question if there's another attack, that they won't demand answers before cooperating and going along with any more radical changes? Can they be sure loyal Americans won't monkey wrench their plans? We the People overthrew the last King George a little over 200 years ago, and today our task is simpler; we're aiming to restore the Republic and prosecute those who subverted the Constitution, not start a violent revolution. The Minot nuke theft was discovered and stopped.
Call me an idiot, but i'm optimistic.
9/11 Family Steering Committee Review of the 9/11 Commission Report:
http://911truth.org/images/resources/Family%20Steering%20Cmte%20review%2...
Complete 9/11 Timeline
http://cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
Anyone thinking had to ask "why secret trials?"
In 2002, when the terrorist suspects were first put in Guantanamo Bay's detention center, and away from prying eyes, and it was said that military tribunals/secret trials were to be used to try them, I sort of wondered why but didn't fully appreciate what was going on.
Then when it came out that torture interrogation techniques were being used, that sort of didn't sit right either, but I still didn't put the puzzle together.
It should now be blatantly obvious to anyone paying attention that the trials had to be secret to hide the fact that these people are patsies and torture had to be used to get them to confess to things they didn't do, so the actual perps of 911 could have their patsies to blame.
Of course, the old national security argument of protecting sources and methods would be used to justify the secret trials. This should not be allowed in the United States and no trial should ever be held secretly as the potential for injustice is too great.
Something needs to be done to prevent high office criminals from hiding behind national security. The FISA act did not do enough in that vein.
It is time to use some real sources and methods on the real perpetrators of 911, and these methods don't need to be secret.









The "secretive nature"...
Of these military tribunals is not the only problem. To read more about them, click here.
The word "classified" appears 28 times in this article. Here is something else where that number is relevant.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?