Blogads

Asbestos Dangers



Mesothelioma is a dreaded cancer that is nearly always caused by just one factor: asbestos exposure.

FACT: Family members of those who are regularly exposed to high levels of asbestos also have a high risk of developing malignant mesothelioma.

Get the news, get the facts.

Automated Precision Satellite Guidance Of 9/11 Type Aircraft Largely Possible Just Before Attacks

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.

- United Airlines Boeing Aircraft, Along With UPS And NASA 757s And 767s Utilized During Pre-9/11 GPS Tests

- Raytheon/FAA Controlled GPS Satellite Navigation Array Activated 13 Months Before 9/11 Attacks

- October, 2001 Pilot Override System Envisioned Use Of Satellite Auto-Navigation Concept And Communications Termination

Because information collected after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 has raised questions about the alleged ability and motivation of the people accused of piloting Boeing 757 and 767 planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, speculation has since lingered regarding the covert use of technology to precisely self-navigate all 4 airliners into targets that day.

Government and aviation industry publications shed light on the development and implementation of pre-9/11 state-of-the-art systems capable of facilitating precise automated navigation of the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft used during the 9/11 attacks, to a given destination.

"WAAS (Wide Area Augmentation System) is an extremely accurate navigation system developed for civil aviation. Before WAAS, the U.S. National Airspace System (NAS) did not have the potential to provide horizontal and vertical navigation for approach operations for all users at all locations. With WAAS, this capability is a reality ... WAAS provides service for all classes of aircraft in all phases of flight - including en route navigation"

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_uni...

Just 13 months before the September 11 terrorist attacks, the WAAS GPS satellite array was activated by the FAA and operated by "Raytheon" on a preliminary basis.

AMENDED VERSION: Wide Area Augmentation System Signal Now Available

August 24, 2000

"WASHINGTON, DC — After a successful 21-day stability test of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) signal in space, the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) declared that it is now available for some aviation and all non-aviation uses ... The system demonstrated one to two meters horizontal accuracy and two to three meters vertical accuracy throughout the contiguous United States ... Raytheon will operate the system for the FAA on a continuous basis"

http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=5249

One member having served on Raytheon's Special Advisory Board is "Project for the New American Century" signatory Richard Armitage.

http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itps/0900/ijpe/pj52bios.htm

Only 3 weeks after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, a patent was applied for regarding a system that would override pilot control from an autopilot equipped aircraft and redirect such an aircraft to a predetermined destination via pre-programmed autopilot settings. This patent cites the Differential Global Position Satellite research and development conducted by Honeywell and NASA during the mid-1990s.

""A method for ... deactivating on-board control of the autopilot system; directing the autopilot system to fly the aircraft to a landing."

"One optional feature of the invention disables the aircraft's communications equipment."

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=...


Honeywell’s Differential GPS Satellite Landing System

July/August, 1995

"The Honeywell team participated in Boeing’s Category III-b flight test evaluation program in July and August of 1995. NASA supplied the 757 aircraft and flight test facility. Boeing supplied the pilots, ground crew, maintenance, flight test personnel and performed the aircraft modifications for the flight tests. The flight tests were accomplished at NASA’s Wallops Island, Virginia, flight test facility. A total of 75 Category III-b automatic landings were accomplished during this phase of flight testing. The autopilot used the DGPS to guide the aircraft to a landing and ... performance data of these flight tests showed that the Honeywell DGPS landing system achieved the predicted system accuracy of one to two meters."

http://www.bluecoat.org/reports/Lewison_96_DGPS.pdf

Getting To The Point In Pinpoint Landing

October, 1994

"A high-performance navigation system used primarily for automatic aircraft touchdowns promises centimeter-level landing accuracy.During a four-day period in October 1994, the idea was put to the test on Runway 35 at NASA's Crows Landing Flight Facility in California. Using signals from orbiting GPS satellites and the ground-generated pseudolite signals, 110 autopilot-in-the-loop landings of a United Airlines Boeing 737 were completed."

http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/spinoff1998/t2.htm


FAA/Ohio University Avionics Engineering Center Partnership

December, 1998

"Ohio University's Avionics Engineering Center recently developed and successfully flight-tested technology that increases the availability and accuracy of the Global Positioning System (GPS) ... This technological breakthrough is the result of a 5-year aviation research grant provided by the FAA to the Avionics Center to design, implement, and test an advanced prototype GPS-based approach, landing, and surface movement guidance system ... Pilots from United Parcel Service (UPS) flight tested the new architecture in October 1994, using a UPS Boeing 757, completing a total of 50 automated landings. During those tests, researchers integrated Differential Global Positioning System into the Boeing 757 autoland system."

http://www.tc.faa.gov/logistics/grants/success/OU.pdf

FAA, ATA, UPS Test New Satellite Technology

August 13, 1999

"In the Atlantic City tests, a "UPS Boeing 767 flown by company pilots will perform 40 approaches down to as low as 25 feet above the runway. The pilots will fly some approaches manually; others will be coupled to the aircraft's autopilot. The LAAS and GPS signals will be processed by equipment specially installed aboard the 767 for these tests. LAAS can tell pilots where their aircraft is to an accuracy of less than one meter, and the system can be used in all visibility conditions. It complements the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) that the FAA is now developing and acquiring."

http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=5052

On September 7, 1998, it was announced that American Airlines and United Airlines selected Honeywell's new GPS capable "Pegasus" Flight Management System (FMS) for use in their Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft.

http://www.aviationnow.com/shownews/farnday1/pressr15.htm

http://www.honeywell.com/sites/aero/Flight_Management_Systems3_C1997B88E...

"A flight management system or FMS is a computerized avionics component found on most commercial and business aircraft to assist pilots in navigation, flight planning, and aircraft control functions. It is considered to be composed of three major components: FMC (Flight Management Computer), AFS (Auto Flight System), and Navigation System including IRS (Inertial Reference System) and GPS."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_management_system

NORAD Had Drills of Jets as Weapons

April 18, 2004

"In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating ... hijacked airliners used as weapons ... NORAD, in a written statement, confirmed ... "Numerous types of civilian and military aircraft were used as mock hijacked aircraft "".

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-04-18-norad_x.htm

AA 11 Approach And Impact


UA 175 Approach And Impact


Aidan...

Thanks for this detailed report.

Welcome

to the Military Industrial Complex.

No surprises here.

Note remote control of aircraft is NOTHING compared to the remote control PSYOPS that theMSNBCFOXCNNCBESABC use to manipulate the American Pschye to the point of Fear and Capitulation to a National Security "Homeland" State of Perpetual Terror and Fear.

Ghosts in the skies, and under every Bush.

TERROR is Big Money, the new Capital for Political, Economic and Social Control.

The Remote Control of the average American Citizen has turned us into a nation of zombies jumping to every fake terror alert and bogus news reports distracting us from the real issues on the state of the economy and political accountability in the country.

"External Threats" are classic tools to distract a gullible citizenry from the Real Threats from within.

Its time to switch of this Remote and go onto CONSTITUTIONAL INDIVIDUAL Control.

Each citizen deciding for himself / herself how they want to live and be governed.

Govt. BY the People.

FOR the People.

Not the War Profitters.

TAKE BACK CONTROL.

CONSTITUTIONAL CONTROL.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Yes! The NWO/globalists are using Orwell's novel 1984 as a

blueprint to turn us into Winston Smith: Endless staged wars to feed the military/industrial complex, totally controlled mainstream media, boogeymen terrorists everywhere, etc.!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321

And the answer to 1984 is

1776.

If America is to live on, the Spirit of the American Revolution has to live on and thrive.

Hopefully we will have a Peaceful Revolution for the Change that we all want.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Nice Work

Great job in digging up this information Aidan. Keep it up brother.

Adain

Thanks for your dedication in our quest for the truth.

FOIA

Aidan,

Can an FOIA be crafted in an attempt to learn more about the modification of aircraft with such devices?

Safelander/Home Run?

Great research as always Aidan.

Incidentally, i would be interested in your view of the theory that the perps gained control of the 4 aircraft from the ground by hacking into anti hijack flight control systems such as 'Safelander' and 'Home Run' .

These systems apparently, had been installed on many airliners prior to the attacks, and allowed for complete remote control of the aircraft from the ground in the event of a hijack.

Interesting

Wasn't aware of the SL and HR concepts. Please pass along any more info.

Still trying to be certain that the WAAS coverage was able to provide the accuracy required to facilitate the conversion of auto-piloted jets into guided missiles. Based on what's available, it would seem so. A LAAS arrangement would require the use of an additional "navaid"-like device located in the vicinity of the WTC, like the "pseudolites" referred to. This would complicate any operation however. A whole lot easier to simply install a modified IC board into a flight management system that could provide for pilot override and execution of a pre-programmed autopilot journey to a certain destination.

Honeywell and Boeing each have foreign customers. Their products are used worldwide. A foreign-based uninterruptable autopilot design compatible with Honeywell Flight Management Systems could escape FAA scrutiny. Depending on how physically integrated a FMS is with the rest of an aircraft, a relatively minor change to the FMS would be all that is needed to convert a passenger jet into an unstoppable guided missile.

A person at a pilot's message board said he would provide me more info on the Honeywell "Pegasus" FMS. Honeywell only provides info to those with a business account. Would love to obtain the opinion of an aerospace or avionics engineer.

Discovery of a pre-9/11 uninterruptable autopilot design based on the "Pegasus" FMS architecture would be the ultimate prize.

It is hard to ignore the timing of the activation of the WAAS system with the 9/11 attacks. (13 months)

Aidan, Have a look at these:-

Aidan, have a look at these:-

http://www.geocities.com/mknemesis/homerun.html
http://www.safelander.com/

Also a company called SPC developed a "Remote Control and flight termination system".
http://www.sysplan.com/Radar/CTS

SPC CEO was Dov S. Zackheim who held a number of DOD positions including
undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller from 2001 to 2004.

More on Zacheim -- PNAC member, dual Israeli/US citizen...

...and one of the framers, prime movers and intellectual architects of PNAC. Dov Zacheim (sometimes spelled "Zackeim") is pretty much a background guy, doesn't get his name on TV or radio or in the papers very much. He did, however, co-author the 2000 PNAC blueprint for global US military dominance in support of unchecked US imperialism called "Rebuilding America's Defenses." The one that called for "...a new Pearl Harbor..." to scare the public into supporting endless war and giant pentagon budgets.

Interestingly, he signed that document with Systems Planning Corp. as his affiliate organization. At the time, he was CEO at SPC International, an SPC subsidiary. From Wikipedia, here's a brief look at what Zacheim's been up to for the past decade. More on SPC, SPC International and another subsidiary, TriData Corp., below. Full Wiki text here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_S._Zakheim

"During the 2000 U.S. Presidential election campaign, Zakheim served as a foreign policy adviser to George W. Bush as part of a group led by Condoleezza Rice that called itself The Vulcans.

"From 1987-2001, Zakheim was CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of System Planning Corporation, a high-technology analytical firm. During that period he served as a consultant to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and sat on a number of major DoD panels, including its Task Force on Defense Reform (1997) and the DoD's first Board of Visitors of Overseas Regional Centers (1998-2001).

"Zakheim is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the International Institute for Strategic Studies, and the United States Naval Institute, and a member of the editorial board of the journal The National Interest. He is a three-time recipient of the Department of Defense's highest civilian award, the Distinguished Public Service Medal, as well as other awards for government and community service.

"He was an Adjunct Scholar of the Heritage Foundation, a Senior Associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and published over 200 articles and monographs on defense issues.

"He was then appointed to be Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller from 2001 to 2004 under the George W. Bush administration, and served in this capacity until April 2004. During his term as Comptroller, he was tasked to help track down the Pentagon's 2.6 trillion dollars ($2,600,000,000,000) worth of unaccounted transactions. He initiated a number of processes that led to the reduction of that sum by two-thirds by the time of his departure, and to its reduction by over 99.9% within two years thereafter.

"He is currently a Vice President of Booz Allen Hamilton." (The pentagon/war industry revolving door turns again. BAH is one of several "defense" contractors and "global strategic" consulting firms suspected of participating in the CIA's ongoing privatization of intel functions -- they hire spies, support mercs, run black ops, all the stuff "real spooks" do. Just no accountability to regulators, congress or the public.)

Apart from Wikipedia's somewhat tame characterization of SPC as a "high technology analytical firm," SPC International was/is(?) neck deep in designing and building airplane remote guidance systems. From 9/11truth.wetpaint.com:

"That is, in 2001 Dov was CEO of SPC International, part of System Planning Corporation, a defense contractor majoring in electronic warfare technologies, including remote-controlled aircraft systems, and the notorious Flight Termination System (FTS) technology that could hijack even a hijacked plane and land or crash it ... ."

Full text here:

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1047.shtml

And this is what SPC's web site says about its remote control and flight termination systems: "System Planning Corporation's Command Transmitter Systems (CTS) provide remote control and flight termination functions through a fully-redundant self-contained solid-state system." Full text here:

http://www.sysplan.com/sysplan/Radar/CTS/index_html

And on using its remote systems to blow a plane out of the sky: "System Planning Corporation's is proud to offer the Flight Termination System (FTS), a fully redundant turnkey range safety and test system for remote control and flight termination of airborne test vehicles. The FTS consists of SPC's Command Transmitter System (CTS) and custom control, interface, and monitoring subsystems. The system is fully programmable and is flexible enough to meet the changing and challenging requirements of today's modern test ranges. " Full text here:

http://www.sysplan.com/sysplan/Radar/FTS/index_html

There are also reports that Zacheim, after moving to the Pentagon in May 2001, chartered 32 or more Boeing 767s fitted out as tankers and arranged to have them flown to Florida-McDill AFB. The linked pages discuss this scenario and its impact on the alleged hijackings, remote control guidance systems and in-flight destruction. Full text here:

http://911review.org/brad.com/batcave/Dov_Zakheim_911.html

and here:

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1047.shtml

Finally, TriData Corp, another subsidiary of System Planning Corporation, Inc., oversaw the investigation of the first "terrorist" attack, the bombing of WTC 1 in 1993. This would have allowed any SPC executive with a need to know – real or invented – to examine highly classified documents not available to anyone outside a of small need-to-know circle and containing extremely sensitive information on, among other vital stats, security systems and structural specifications.

Therefore, Zacheim would almost certainly have had access to detailed blueprints of WTC 1, structurally identical to WTC 2, and containing all the information needed to position charges to cause complete structural collapse and direct the hundreds of tons of debris downward and away from adjacent structures.

Unfortunately for the OCT, some of those explosions occurred with enough force to blow huge steel beams weighing as much as 40 tons over a debris field some 400 yards in diameter. The OCT requires belief that only two forces brought down all three buildings. Extraordinary heat from oxygen-starved fires that somehow burned hotter than physics tells us is possible; and gravitational force causing near vertical collapse.

To my knowledge, nobody has even tried to explain how vertical momentum was converted to angular momentum without any additional forces acting on the material at the time of collapse. There was one feeble attempt to explain the horizontal momentum by theorizing that the air on each story was trapped, compressed and blown sideways when the pancaking floors above acted as a giant piston in a compressor.

Since the pancaking theory went away fairly quickly, replaced by something called multiple simultaneous failure, you'd expect the compressed air nonsense to go along with it. But no... OCT fans have no problem citing these self-canceling theories and claiming they prove anything at all.

Given the mountain of physical, circumstantial, empirical and anecdotal evidence painstakingly collected and analyzed in the six years and 10 months since the Bushies' own Reichstag Fire, the case for controlled demolition has been made far beyond the standard of reasonable doubt. Therefore, the case for administration complicity -- whether letting it happen or planning the entire op themselves -- is made at the same time.

And yet, we had a House judiciary committee impeachment hearing yesterday that wasn't about impeachment. The ground rules prohibited mentioning any of the principals by name who would have been the subject of impeachment had this actually been an impeachment hearing. So Bush and Cheney were referred to as "high administration officials" or "top Bush white house officials." The couple of hundred serial criminals who work for them we're

wp

Does this explain the "missing" WTC black boxes?

The official claim that the 4 WTC black boxes "were not found"--not even in pieces--has always struck me as a furiously waving red flag.

Would the use of this technology be revealed by analysis of the Flight Data Recorders?

http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff12202005.html

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

GREAT article, Aidan, and good question from Michael Fury

This doesn't prove this is how 9/11 was done, but it proves it could've been done this way, seems like it may be a very fruitful line of questioning. I find it hard to believe the perps would entrust the mission to pilots in the planes, if they could be controlling them within 1-2 meters remotely

Have you uncovered anything on how this might've affected the black box recordings, as Michael asked? They could have any number of reasons to hide or distort the data on them, i suppose

Keep on digging!

9/11 Family Steering Committee Review of the 9/11 Commission Report:
http://911truth.org/images/resources/Family%20Steering%20Cmte%20review%2...

Complete 9/11 Timeline
http://cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Black Boxes

I suspect that the WTC FDRs became very damaged and charred and were simply "missed" by an untrained eye and destroyed with the rest of the thousands of tons WTC rubble.

Given the smaller areas and less wreckage, the Pentagon and Shanksville scenes were much more search-friendly IMO.

Except that witnesses claim they WERE found.

Possible they were not recognized, assuming that no "trained eyes" found them. But as the Lindorff article summarizes, at least two members of the FDNY and one source at the NTSB claim that the black boxes WERE found, that they were "worked on", that the FBI has (had) them but for some reason simply denies their existence.

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

Perhaps They Were Mistaken

I'm just not sure.

Here is an image of the FDR recovered from AA 587, which seems to have been traveling at a much lower velocity and may have been subjected to less fire damage than any WTC FDRs (AA 587 crashed into a neighborhood shortly after take-off at a relatvely low rate of speed by comparison, if I remember correctly.)

Given that only a small percentage of first responders at the WTC were actual NTSB recovery personnel, its possible that similarly charred and damaged WTC FDRs were simply mistaken for other wreckage and "tossed" so to speak.

I've seen the "Counterpunch" report regarding the alleged examination of reportedly recovered WTC FDRs, however ever since American Free Press reported that Bush and Cheney had been indicted by a special prosecutor 3-4 years ago, I am skeptical of web based reports that don't name sources or provide evidence that can be examined.

The article cites an NTSB "source", however if the FBI had suppressed their existence yet provided them to the NTSB for examination, this could create a number of serious credibility problems for the FBI and even allegations of a cover-up, were this information to become part of an official record.

Drop back just a bit here...

Just STOP...

... for a minute in dealing with the psy-ops that we were hand fed on 9/11 about the "black boxes" found by some "not-so-random searchers" at the WTC sites.

Now, the black boxes weigh no more than 15 pounds....and the WTCs weigh..._________pounds [somebody do the math please]...and in this total collapsed mass, we find the 15 pound FDRs amongst the _________________pounds of WTC "stuff"?

Didn't somebody say that the only "office equipment" found was 1/2 of a phone key pad?

OH...DAMN!!!...please forget my line of thinking...the intact passport on Manhattan and the red bandana at Shanksville are commanding evidence. I'm sorry to waste your time! PLEASE forget about my points...

Seriously, that the black boxes were found so quickly at the WTCs is just another lie.

Talk about a needle in a haystack...

And the FBI....boy, are THEY in deep trouble....

But psy-ops are psy-ops and they work really well...USUALLY!

Robin Hordon

PS: Can somebody please do the math about the weight/mass of the WTC debris...the steel beams...and the "pancaked cement floors???"...and post this here...thanks!

I think that THESE numbers will establish some very clear probabilities.....like-NO WAY JOSE' at finding the FDRs in the middle of this complete frigging mess.

Oh yeah, I forgot, it MUST be true because some "schleps" set out on the specific task of finding the FDRs and handily found them. You just gotta be kiding me!

I mean really?

...are you yanking my crank here...finding these little boxes in the middle of this unbelievable "pile-o-stuff"...and just in time for the "psy-op", ooops, I mean...the nightly news?

PLEASE...just STOP...for just a few seconds and think about this story...

I think that these FDRs are planted.

Robin Hordon

Here is a provocative video from a rather strange website that

claims the airliners were swapped for drones: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3962883610962556504

The video is about 23 minutes long, and the airliners are covered at about the 7:35 mark. (It could be info, disinfo, or a mixture of both, but I think it's worth viewing.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321

Not the assigned pilots...

Aidan,

Terriffic compilation of research. Thanks again.

My position is that the most important thing to realize about the WTC collisions and UA93 is that these airliners were NOT being flown by the certified professional airline pilots assigned to fly those aircraft on 9/11/2001. So, the field is WIDE OPEN...at least in my mind. A few points:

1. I think that its important to note that most likely, some form of "autopiloting" was engaged in the two flights striking the WTCs, and that pursuant to that, the navigational instructions would be driving the flight managementt-navgation systems, and consequently, the accuracies of such navigational instructions would be the SAME whether or not the following were in control of these airliners:

...an airlinepilot...
...a hijacker who could insert specific "waypoints" or 'lats-longs" into the nav systems...
...if it were remote controlled from above...
...if it were remote controlled from the ground...
...if it were remote controlled from an airbourne platform such as a command E4B...

2. To me, the strongest "clue" that the remote control may have been used comes in two places...both have to do with radio transmissions, and you "may have" answered one of them.

One...it is so unusual to have the uses of inner-cockpit radio/PA communications switching to happen IN ERROR not only ONCE...but TWICE, that I have always suspected this "set of coincidences" as being way too unusual. In over 125,000 communications that I was involved in over my 11 years as an air traffic controller [ estimated half of the two way communications], I remember only THREE times that I heard communications from the pilots to the passengers. Another ATC currently working feels much the same way.

These radio transmissions are the FIRST indicators that it was "hijackings",and that it was Arabs performing them...OTHER THAN the "canned psy-ops" that the corporate media began spewing almost immediately after the WTCs were hit. These transmissions could have come from airbourne platforms operating in "The 9/11 Attack War Game Scenario". These radio transmissions would accomplish the TWO most important things required to happen on 9/11...

...that the actions were NOT "in flight emergencies" but were hijackings in order to trigger the SLOW scramble protocols requiring "their boss's" approvals from the Pentagon...

...and that it was the Muslim World that was perpetrating these attacks on the USofA...

Two....if the airliners were taken over by remote control and the airline pilots were alive and acting normally, they would have used their radios to call mayday. However, if the "external hacking" involved controling the radios also, as you suggest might be possible, that would explain their silence...

BUT...if the entire "take-over" program was to prevent hijacking, one would NOT remove the two-way radio access to the pilots because communications are critical to hijackers...

DOUBLE BUT...the secret military involved in this "take-over" capability would most likely make sure that disabling the radios COULD be accomplished also. Its an "evidence" thing...the calls for mayday would certainly point towards trouble for the secret military's schemes and they hate bread crumb trails leading to their hidden houses in their thickly overgrown woods...

More later...alotta reading to do...

Robin Hordon

Robin.....

....Have you ever tried talking to those air traffic controllers that were on duty on 9/11 ? I think a video of that would be awesome.
Anyone else here at 911Blogger think so?

Inside controllers...

I have tried a few ways to reach out to some controllers without any luck.

And I will forever refuse to identify my "contacts" inside ZBW that have informed me that things are NOT the way that the HI PERPS have claimed.

Current ATCs all remember PATCO...because that's how and why they got their jobs in the first place. ATCs are pretty bright and hopefullly, as the 9/11 Onion gets peeled more and more, many more "whistleblowers" will start coming out of the FAA and the US Military to add their pieces to the efforts of the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Robin Hordon

Great Points

Thanx all.

Yes, the alleged cockpit transmissions always seemed designed for public consumption and could have originated from anywhere.

"Hot wired" flight management systems tied to the extremely accurate GPS guidance might eliminate need for remotely located operator. Not being expert in this area makes it hard to know.

Ferric Oxide:

As far as FAA approvals for design and manufacture of avionics, one can search the FAA site under Technical Standard Orders (TSOs). I haven't had much time to look.

As far as the the recovered FDRs, I suppose a genuine FDR would record the activity of a "hot wired" FMS. The ones recovered show no such information to my knowledge. However, there is enough absent device information to cause one to wonder if the FDRs were tied to the 9/11 aircraft. (Absent serial numbers, file creation time discrepancies, etc.)

Incredible compilation of information!

This would make for a great trifold flyer to hand out to people. Yeah? Any volunteers?

With you in the struggle,
Bruno
WeAreChangeLA - http://www.wacla.org

Flight 93 & Bld 7

Is It possible/feasable that flight 93 was intended to strike building # 7 and since it didn't make it, they went ahead and "pulled it". Building # 7 doesn't look like it was tall enough for a plane to target it but I can't figure what their explaination was going to be for it's collapse. Obviously they haven't really had to explain it but it seems they must have had something up their sleeve that didn't pan out.

Maybe, maybe not

I suspected that myself for some time. But maybe the kind of demolition speaks against it - Building 1 and 2 were demolished from the top down, because that's where the planes hit, and they were brought down in a very explosive way. Building 7 was a classic controlled demolition, starting from the bottom, and imploding, not exploding. I'm not sure, but this could indicate they really never planned to fly a plane into it.

Valid guess...

I actually DO THINK that UA93 may have had WTC7 as its target...especially if one considers the lost "records" destroyed in this MODERN "Den of Thieves".

That WTC7 was a controlled demolition matching demolitions of lower/smaller building structures, does NOT disquaify it as being part of "The 9/11 Attack War Game Scenario" in which WTC7 would also be struck by an airliner AND would ALSO be blown to bits. WTC7 would be handled differently from the taller buildings.

Its good to remember that many folks think that if THEY had to bring down the tall boys, they would start from the top-to-the-bottom, and NOT the usual bottom-mid...to top demolitions. Its the "tip-over thing" where one wouldn't want to put Larry's real estate friends in extra financial difficulty by crashing into their adjacent buildings...a simple "back scratching thing" that the ruling class does all the time.

Also, although not a real strong argument at the moment, it CAN be argued that once the tall boys were down, the shorter guy would now become a much easier [taller] target to whack.

So, its a pretty good angle that you project here...

Robin Hordon

Pseudolite

http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=5052
1999
"Specifically, the flight tests will study the benefits of integrating a 'pseudolite' into the existing FAA LAAS prototype. A pseudolite is a ground component installed at the airport that appears to be another GPS satellite to an aircraft's navigation system."

Evidence of the IR guidance from a "pseudolite" caught on film? I recall seeing this video and dismissing it as too speculative, especially the second half. Given new evidence, however, the first half which examines the strange 'white dot' occurrence seems rather interesting. Any thoughts?

Link to entire video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr4BJ89Df5Q

The entire video regarding the possible targeting device is very informative.

Occam's Razor

I think the above article is interesting but I also think it fails to take into account the principle of Occam's Razor.

Any criminal risking his life to pull off a job wants the least possible amount of risk.

Why risk the 'bleeding edge' of technology and gamble on a complex series of technical feats when there is an entire continent full to the brim of young, ultra religious victims of American overseas gunboat diplomacy who would queue up to do it for free!

Americans in general and the whitehouse regime in particular don't even count the number of foreigners killed in these little skirmishes. We hear a lot about 'our boys in harms way' and 'US soldiers killed' but very little, if anything, about Iraqi citizens slain or Irani soldiers killed in their beds at night by foreign invaders under cover of night.

Why the hell would Bush risk exposure due to a glitch in some brand new technology when he can just encourage a few worthless foreigners to do the job for him.

It provides more cover if the whole mess does start to come out in the open and involves less 'accountable' US citizens who are more difficult to kill if their silence is required.

Cool technology but, for me, Occam's Razor rules.

Addendum in support

Part of the Bush problem is that they appear to rely on 'clean' hitmen [i.e. upstanding ultra-republican ex-military, ex-CIA] rather than people like the mob who are used to making these things look like accidents.

If you take a look at the long list of Bush-related suicides, that is people who would help the Bush family by committing suicide, weird stuff comes up. For example, at least two people on the Bush shit-list have committed suicide by shooting themselves in the head... twice. In the military its called 'double-tapping'. If you're a military or ex-military shooter, its a reflex you almost can't avoid. It's drummed into you in army school; double-tap, double-tap, double-tap.

With goons like these as your wetwork cleaners, it would definitely be safer to involve as few patsies as possible in a job as potentially harmful to Bush butts as the 9/11 caper.

For another interesting bit of supporting data, take a look at http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/new_math_bush_reporter_suicides.htm

If that's not enough, there's always Marvin Bush's nanny who accidentally crushed herself against a wall using HER OWN CAR. http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/10-16-03/discussion.cgi.16.html

Or the woman who committed suicide after filing a rape claim against Jeb Bush. Gunshot wound to the head - quite unusual in female suicides. http://www.opednews.com/thoreau1103bush_rape_suicide.htm

I'll end the list on the so-called DC Madame who went on three radio shows and said - I'm happy and well adjusted, if I turn up dead, its murder!

Sadly, she committed suicide shortly after and 1 [one] person out of 300 million Americans vaguely remembered her saying that she'd rather die than go to jail. Oh yeh, the one person was a member of what we now call the MSM.

I'd better stop now. Although I feel fine, if I keep going I might turn up next week having shot myself twice in the head.