Recent Headlines
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Recent Media
They will not control us.
Confronting 9/11 commissioner John Lehman
Madeline Albright confronted on Bilderberg and New World Order Crimes including 9/11
WeAreChangeLA Confronts Amy Goodman On Alleged Progressive Media's Blackout And Smear Campaign Of Real 9/11 Investigation
Dr. Graeme MacQueen on Myth and Foreign Policy
US poet JerryMazza RussiaToday August 02, 2009
War on Terror: Expenditures
New DVD - Steven Jones: Nano-Thermite
MI5 officer visited Morocco three times while Binyam Mohamed was tortured
Real Time problems with Bill Maher?
WeAreChangeLA delivers scientific proof of 9/11 TREASON
Richard Gage, AIA and AE911Truth Staff at the Recent AIA Convention in Washington DC
Russia Today covers Richard Gage's efforts in Washington D.C.
AUDIO: Jonathan Cole on WENG Radio, Englewood Fl.
AUDIO: Truth Action Ottawa interviews Cosmos from truthaction.org
VIDEO: Star Wars & False Flag Terrorism 2.0
VIDEO: Annie Machon and Barrie Zwicker
AUDIO: Peter Dale Scott on "Diet Soap"
AUDIO: AE911Truth on KGO AM Radio
VIDEO: Jonathan Kay, "Journalist", comes back for more 9/11 Truth
VIDEO: Dr. Steven Jones at UC Davis - May1, 2009
VIDEO: Richard Gage AIA on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, CA
VIDEO: AE911Truth “Companion” Edition 10-Minute WTC 7 Video
AUDIO: Visibility 9-11 Welcomes John-Michael Talboo and Stewart Bradley of Debunking the Debunkers
Banner Exchange
User login
9/11 Related Sites
911Research.WTC7.net
911speakout.org
911review.com
world911truth.org
911proof.com
truthmove.org
911pressfortruth.com
patriotsquestion911.com
csi911.info
911revisited.com
william911.com
911debunkers.blogspot.com
Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
International Citizens' Inquiry Into 9/11
truthaction.org
911readingroom.org
911reports
9eleven.info
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
deceptiondollar.com
legitgov.org
911omissionreport.com
911tv.org
pnacitizen.org
thedebate.org
grandtheftcountry.com
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
flight93crash.com
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
mime11.com
physics911.net
911docs.net
9/11 International Sites
torontochange.com
911sandhed.nu
www.i11time.dk
reopen911.info
investigar11s.org
911truth.no
911belgium.be
v911truth.org
stoplying.ca
911truth.eu
911truthpeterborough.com
luogocomune.net
911info.se
1192001.dk
11syyskuu.org
serendipity.li
eqgen.nl/aanslagen911
onderzoek911.nl
waarheid911.nl
zapruder.nl
911truthbristol.com
911truthtotnes.com
september11.se
vaken.se
911oz.com
nineeleven.co.uk
hintergrund.de
broeckers.com
thecoop.tv
operation911.de
medienanalyse-international.de
911komplott.de
deepjournal.com
truth4peace.co.uk
911truthskipton.com
wytruth.org.uk
editionsdemilune.com
cremationofcare.com
Investigate 9/11
9/11 Truth Europe
911.yweb.sk
9/11 Memorial Sites
News and Blogs
Wikileaks
Project Censored
Freedoms Phoenix
Cryptome
Truth Alliance Network
Dandelion Salad
The New American Dream
George Washington
The Raw Story
The Real News.com
The Daily Dirt
Better Bad News
Featured Story
infowars.com
meria.net
maxkeiser.com
Ignorance Isnt Bliss
rinf.com
Public Policy News and Research
informationclearinghouse.info
globalresearch.ca
mathaba.net
flybynews.com
Dandelion Salad
Mark Crispin Miller
Pimpin' Turtle
American's Journey
damien911.blogspot.com
Rosie.com
Questioning the War on Terrorism
culhavoc.blogsome.com
arabesque911.blogspot.com
dailypaul.com
Confirmed: The Pakistani General Who Wired $100,000 to Mohammad Atta Met with Wolfowitz, Feith and Other Neocons the Week of 911
In response to a Freedom of Information Act Request submitted by Kevin Ryan, Mick Harrison and Paul Smith, the government has disclosed documents confirming that Pakistani ISI General Ahmed - the guy who wired 100,000 dollars to lead hijacker Atta -- met with Wolfowitz, Feith, Peter Rodman (PNAC), and others the week of he week of 9/11.
All credit goes to Kevin, Mick and Paul. I'm just reporting on their efforts.
Probably Regarding U.S. Decisions To Act Upon Afghanistan
The U.S. decided just before 9/11 to take action against Afghanistan. Pakistan would seem to be part of the equation.
Interestingly, Wolfowitz is notorious for not being interested in the topic of "terrorism" just prior to 9/11. Seems Iraq was also on the minds of some during this time.
Good job...
To all involved. Everything is classified in the document.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030325-11.html
Does that document say that Tommy Franks met with him as well?
I always found this to be interesting from Franks.
http://web.archive.org/web/20010602140951/http://www.house.gov/hasc/open...
"The Central Region is of vital interest to the United States. Sixty-eight percent of the world's proven oil reserves are found in the Gulf Region and 43 percent of the world's petroleum exports pass through the Strait of Hormuz. The developing energy sector of the Central Asian States, with the potential for discovery of additional oil reserves, further emphasizes the importance of the Central Region to America and the world."
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
nice
by putting a line thru Feith's name, are they saying he wasn't there? They put a line thru all the "confidential" headings
I wonder if US rep (6), redacted, was Condoleeza "he was CERTAINLY NOT meeting with me!!!" Rice?
9/11 Family Steering Committee Review of the 9/11 Commission Report:
http://911truth.org/images/resources/Family%20Steering%20Cmte%20review%2...
Complete 9/11 Timeline
http://cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
90% of the whole thing...
Is classified. It's so we feel secure nationally.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
it's not working for me, and what are the 3 characters?
all those blanked out parts make me feel less secure, especially knowing some stuff about the names that aren't redacted- i suppose some of those invisible public servants might say i'm unAmerican
Page 13 at the top: SECRET/***/NOFORN/ORCON the scribbled out 3 letter whatever it is, is partly visible- I'd say the
1st letter is L almost for sure
2nd - C or G ?
3rd - S - see pg 2 also for this one
What would this be- is it necessarily an agency, or is it a code? Might the characters be numbers?
pg 13 is the most clear that i can see, but bits on other pages are slightly visible.
9/11 Family Steering Committee Review of the 9/11 Commission Report:
http://911truth.org/images/resources/Family%20Steering%20Cmte%20review%2...
Complete 9/11 Timeline
http://cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
NOFORN...
Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals/Governments/Non-US Citizens
ORCON...
Dissemination & Extraction of Information Controlled by Originator
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
I have to agree about the "blanks"
That always looked spooky , and not in a good way. It produces anxiety in people, not security. It's bollox anyway--like police investigations, once it's over and you have the perp, it should be ALL available to the public.
Mind they probably drag out some poncy excuse like " well, its never really over thats why we can't tell you everything".
*sigh*
______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
http://truthaction.org/forum/
http://www.911blacklist.org/
Very nice work.
;-)
_____________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
http://truthaction.org/forum/
http://www.911blacklist.org/
By the way...
It may be better to say he allegedly ordered Sheikh to transfer the $100,000 to Atta. Believe me, there is enough information to suggest that it did happen... but it is still alleged.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
"Believe me"
"Believe me, there is enough information to suggest that it did happen.."
Sorry, but i dont really like to just "believe" people on such things, i prefer to see some actual evidence.
Why should i speculate on someones 'believes' ?
This whole story seems really dubious to me.
Ok then.
Don't believe me. Do your own research.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
OK
Yes, ive done my own research. And i came to the conclusion that this story is highly dubious from a to z.
Its very speculative, and the sources are dubious too. Not even to mention the conflicts of interest ....
Also, as Danse points out below, even if it were true, what does it mean?
It seems quite weird to me that someone who thinks the demolition of the towers is 'speculation' would consider this whole story as bulletproof.
Sounds like a double-standard to me.
Because...
I've done the research, and it doesn't seem very speculative, and the sources don't seem dubious. Nor did I say it was bulletproof. What is EXTREMELY apparent is the 9/11 Commission's obvious cover-up of this story.
Incidentally, when's the last time a hit piece, or documentary designed to debunk something mentioned the allegation that Lt. General Mahmood Ahmed ordered Omar Sheikh to wire transfer $100k to Mohammad Atta, and showed that it didn't happen? Never?
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
...
"incidentally, when's the last time a hit piece, or documentary designed to debunk something mentioned the allegation that Lt. General Mahmood Ahmed..."
I dont know, probably never because nobody really cares about this story?
It doesnt really challenge the 911 myth of freedom-hating muslim hijackers, there isnt all that much to "debunk" here.
And even if true, it doesnt really mean all that much. So why bother.
It sounds more like useful confusion and somkescreen to me.
Anyways , Jon, your "see they dont 'debunk' this because they can't - unlike CD which can be debunked so easily" argument is getting really really tiring.
It seems to be all you got, but its obviously totally flawed, as many people have pointed out again and again.
Mmhmmm...
"I dont know, probably never because nobody really cares about this story?"
Which is why the families submitted a question about this very subject to the 9/11 Commission in the hopes that they would answer it. Which is why this story has shown up in 90% of all 9/11 related books written, as well as 9/11 related movies made.
"It doesnt really challenge the 911 myth of freedom-hating muslim hijackers, there isnt all that much to "debunk" here."
It's the Real Thing.
"And even if true, it doesnt really mean all that much. So why bother."
Doesn't sound to me like you're someone that's really interested in the truth about 9/11. Maybe you're just someone that likes to bother me?
"It seems to be all you got, but its obviously totally flawed, as many people have pointed out again and again."
Pakistan's connection to 9/11 is all I got? Controlled Demolition isn't used against us at every opportunity? Something tells me that your idea of flawed, and my idea of flawed are two totally different things.
Now em7, as Reprehensor told you, stop being my gadfly.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
...
"Pakistan's connection to 9/11 is all I got? "
No Jon, we know you also have the august 6 warning and all that ..
I was talking about your tiring "see they only debunk CD but never the foreknoledge or the wire transfer" 'argument' that you bring up *all the time*.
Not once did you reply to a critique of that argument, and there were dozens.
See, if you keep on applying such obvious double-standards , like accepting all sorts of dubious stories as 'proof' as long as theres some muslims involved - and on the other hand labeling and attacking people as '"theorists who dont really want the truth" when they talk about the obvious demolition of 3 buildings - you have to expect that some people will disagree with you. Persistently and strongly.
You keep on posting the SAME STUFF over and over again. Since years. Thats why some people disagree over and over again.
Your "muslims did 911 and US allowed it to happen" stories just dont fit in with *what we know*, that those 3 buildings were blown up, and thats why many people believe that your stories are misleading.
Now you can post your 'ah so you you know exactly what happend i dont' stuff that you usually do in such a situation.
So to pre-answer: no, i dont know exactly what happend, but i can apply common sense, which is why i know that 3 buildings were blown up.
So you're saying...
em7, if I may: The more you
em7, if I may:
The more you think you know, and the less you think, the more you'll think you know.
However, the more you think, the more you'll know the less you know.
Think about it.
/////////////////////////////////
Great minds ... think for themselves.
absurd
"And no, we DON'T know that "3 buildings were blown up", but go on thinking that you know that. If thinking that you are 100% correct makes you feel safe living in this crazy world, then by all means."
Thats absurd Jon. Its the sort of thing theyre telling us in "debunker" movies, "conspiracy theorists just feel better believing what they do" sort of crap.
Interesting to see youre using the same sort of tactics when it comes to the obvious demolition of 3 buildings on 911.
"em7... what have you got other than an anonymous name?"
So is this a 'i have more blogs online than you' competition?
Or is it a popularity contest?
Admittedly, im a truther-nobody on the internets. But ive got common sense. And i dont judge people by the number of blogs they posted, but by its content.
It is already well known that you posted more misleading smokescreen blogs about 9/11 than anyone else, whilest at the same time desperately trying to steer people away from the obvious demolitions (which did more to grow awareness in public than anything else). Whilest always using the family members as shields so people cant criticise you.
No need to repost all that.
I think you are confusing
According to you...
em7
This is a lie;
"It is already well known that you posted more misleading smokescreen blogs about 9/11 than anyone else, whilest at the same time desperately trying to steer people away from the obvious demolitions (which did more to grow awareness in public than anything else). Whilest always using the family members as shields so people cant criticise you."
It seems to me that the only reason you come to this site is to pick fights with Jon Gold. Jon has posted tons of informative, useful blogs, quite a few of them here, and that's a fact.
This has been going on "since years" and I'm sick of it. Go find someone else to stalk and draw into arguments, and do it somewhere else.
Thanks.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
Felt. Thanks
You may not know anything but
DRG, Steven Jones, Richard Gage, and a whole lot of other professionally experienced, science-based people do know for a fact: the towers were destroyed with pre-planted explosives. People with a lot more experience and knowledge of such matters than Jon Gold. So although he may not know anything about how the towers came down, that ignorance doesn't transfer to the rest of us.
> but go on thinking that you know that. If thinking that you are 100% correct makes you feel safe living in this crazy world, then by all means.
What an odd concept. You form your beliefs based on how safe something makes you feel (?!) I guess that could explain a lot.
I voted you up...
Because I think you guys are doing a great job attacking me. Keep it up.
BTW... Can you give me the name of someone involved in planting the explosives?
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
thanks for the vote, Jon!
But I'm not attacking you, just pointing out that your (self-proclaimed) ignorance does not necessarily carry over to the rest of the population. I'm sorry you view this as an attack.
And I'm glad you asked. The arrow of suspicion clearly points at Larry Silverstein, Jerome Hauer and the men of Urban Moving Systems.
They got some splainin to do.
right tahooey
no offense, but i am aghast that so many supposed 911 truth people would still not accept demolition! i'm in a state of disbelief! what do they think happened?
What about Dr. Steven JOnes's research, etc...the thermate signatures in the microspheres??? pulverized everything...it's been a while since i've been here, and i'm sorry about that. it is important for there to be an informative and compelling 911 blog site..i have met some of the best on 9/11 blogger. but now some have been banned, which is a shame.
great work on FOIA request.
Thanks to Kevin, Mick and Paul for getting the information released albeit highly redacted.
It does show that the Neocons were meeting with someone who likely was a financial backer for Atta.
Wolfowitz, the guy who continues to fail miserably at every job he gets, continues to get more important and powerful positions within the US government. What a fucking weasel! He obviously knows too much to be cut loose.









Substantially re-written:
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/07/confirmed-pakistani-genera...