there's nothing in this interview that indicates Jennings timeline has been compromised. That's good.

Jason: The most important part of the Jennings interview is up the the point he and Hess arrive on the 23rd floor and go into the OEM bunker. After that, the details become less and less useful and the claims more easily made suspect. But those first few minutes are HUGE. You need to corroborate or refute the claims made about when Hess and Jennings arrived and what they saw and what was happening inside and outside when they got to the 23rd floor. And in a way, it doesn't matter whether testimony supports or refutes his claim. We will win either way because if others support his claims, then someone has a lot of explaining to do about why the OEM bunker was abandoned BEFORE the second tower was hit, like who gave that order and why. If others refute his video testimony, especially Hess, and it's a high-level contradiction, that's serious grounds for starting an investigation in NYC. But you have to start getting other comments on these claims or they are useless, regardless of how important their potential might be. You can start by getting WAC to start questioning Hess.

You're doing great, kid. Keep it up.