Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Belgian 9/11-investigation poll up & running

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.

So far so good... poll will close Sept. 11. Stay tuned! :-)

http://www.terzijde.be/2008/07/enqute-een-nieuw-onderzoek-naar-911.html

Wilt u een nieuw 9/11-onderzoek? (Do you want a new 9/11 investigation?)
> Ja, reden genoeg (Yes, there are good reasons for that)
> Nee, geen reden toe (No, there are no good reason for that)
> Nee, wel reden maar niet haalbaar (No, there are good reason for that but it's impossible, it will never happen)

89.6% say "Ja!!"

89.6% say "Ja!!"

approx. 91% of Belgian poll

It looks like approximately 91% of Belgians believe there's a good reason for a new 9/11 investigation. Thanks for the translation.

Belgians....
...don't believe them!

Hm, I'd rather say approx.

Hm, I'd rather say approx. 91% of the poll responders think there's good. That is more than a nuance. But if the number grows large enough, we can still do something with it.

Or rather

It looks like approx. xx% of poll responders (mainly from dutch-speaking part of belgium & holland) think there's good raison to. :-)