Recent Headlines
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Recent Media
They will not control us.
Confronting 9/11 commissioner John Lehman
Madeline Albright confronted on Bilderberg and New World Order Crimes including 9/11
WeAreChangeLA Confronts Amy Goodman On Alleged Progressive Media's Blackout And Smear Campaign Of Real 9/11 Investigation
Dr. Graeme MacQueen on Myth and Foreign Policy
US poet JerryMazza RussiaToday August 02, 2009
War on Terror: Expenditures
New DVD - Steven Jones: Nano-Thermite
MI5 officer visited Morocco three times while Binyam Mohamed was tortured
Real Time problems with Bill Maher?
WeAreChangeLA delivers scientific proof of 9/11 TREASON
Richard Gage, AIA and AE911Truth Staff at the Recent AIA Convention in Washington DC
Russia Today covers Richard Gage's efforts in Washington D.C.
AUDIO: Jonathan Cole on WENG Radio, Englewood Fl.
AUDIO: Truth Action Ottawa interviews Cosmos from truthaction.org
VIDEO: Star Wars & False Flag Terrorism 2.0
VIDEO: Annie Machon and Barrie Zwicker
AUDIO: Peter Dale Scott on "Diet Soap"
AUDIO: AE911Truth on KGO AM Radio
VIDEO: Jonathan Kay, "Journalist", comes back for more 9/11 Truth
VIDEO: Dr. Steven Jones at UC Davis - May1, 2009
VIDEO: Richard Gage AIA on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, CA
VIDEO: AE911Truth “Companion” Edition 10-Minute WTC 7 Video
AUDIO: Visibility 9-11 Welcomes John-Michael Talboo and Stewart Bradley of Debunking the Debunkers
Banner Exchange
User login
9/11 Related Sites
911Research.WTC7.net
911speakout.org
911review.com
world911truth.org
911proof.com
truthmove.org
911pressfortruth.com
patriotsquestion911.com
csi911.info
911revisited.com
william911.com
911debunkers.blogspot.com
Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
International Citizens' Inquiry Into 9/11
truthaction.org
911readingroom.org
911reports
9eleven.info
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
deceptiondollar.com
legitgov.org
911omissionreport.com
911tv.org
pnacitizen.org
thedebate.org
grandtheftcountry.com
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
flight93crash.com
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
mime11.com
physics911.net
911docs.net
9/11 International Sites
torontochange.com
911sandhed.nu
www.i11time.dk
reopen911.info
investigar11s.org
911truth.no
911belgium.be
v911truth.org
stoplying.ca
911truth.eu
911truthpeterborough.com
luogocomune.net
911info.se
1192001.dk
11syyskuu.org
serendipity.li
eqgen.nl/aanslagen911
onderzoek911.nl
waarheid911.nl
zapruder.nl
911truthbristol.com
911truthtotnes.com
september11.se
vaken.se
911oz.com
nineeleven.co.uk
hintergrund.de
broeckers.com
thecoop.tv
operation911.de
medienanalyse-international.de
911komplott.de
deepjournal.com
truth4peace.co.uk
911truthskipton.com
wytruth.org.uk
editionsdemilune.com
cremationofcare.com
Investigate 9/11
9/11 Truth Europe
911.yweb.sk
9/11 Memorial Sites
News and Blogs
Wikileaks
Project Censored
Freedoms Phoenix
Cryptome
Truth Alliance Network
Dandelion Salad
The New American Dream
George Washington
The Raw Story
The Real News.com
The Daily Dirt
Better Bad News
Featured Story
infowars.com
meria.net
maxkeiser.com
Ignorance Isnt Bliss
rinf.com
Public Policy News and Research
informationclearinghouse.info
globalresearch.ca
mathaba.net
flybynews.com
Dandelion Salad
Mark Crispin Miller
Pimpin' Turtle
American's Journey
damien911.blogspot.com
Rosie.com
Questioning the War on Terrorism
culhavoc.blogsome.com
arabesque911.blogspot.com
dailypaul.com
Rebuttal of Noam Chomsky's 9/11 Comments
The Corbett Report has just released a two-part documentary as a rebuttal to Chomsky's infamous 9/11 comments. These videos seek to expose the nonsensical and contradictory arguments Chomsky makes in trying to discredit 9/11 Truth. The documentary is intended to be an activist tool for spreading 9/11 Truth to academics, leftists and Chomskyites. If you think it is well-presented, please help get the word out by sending the link to people you think it might wake up.
Noam Chomsky: Manufacturing Dissent 1/2
Noam Chomsky: Manufacturing Dissent 2/2
The first video covers Chomsky's denial of the viability of 9/11 science and his bizarre non sequitur that people shouldn't look into 9/11 Truth because someone can make up a conspiracy about a car crash. In our second video we delve into some of the numerous reasons people should look into 9/11 Truth, from terrorist financiers meeting with intelligence committee chairman on the day of the attack to CIA insider trading to Able Danger to military drills. We end by answering Chomsky's infamous question "Who cares?" about 9/11 Truth.
If you think these videos are effective, please help spread the word on them.
NOTE: This is a re-post of an earlier entry. The videos were edited to correct the earlier mistaken implication that Chomsky's comments in video 1 came after the publication of Professor Jones et. al.'s scientific peer-reviewed paper. The comments were in fact made 10 days before the release of that article, though it makes no difference to the argument contained in the videos.
How much longer do you suppose we'll need to mollycoddle
Chomsky disciples & their ilk? It's far beyond tedious already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321
Great job!
Great job!
chomsky is no longer relevent
after reading many of his books i must abandon him, he proves that the elites will never break ranks in the class wars of these dark times,his complicity is mass murder complicity
i wonder if he is of their mind of has he been frightened into
delivering these attacks on 911 inquiry
Sample questions for Chomsky
"You have made remarks in the past disparaging the 9/11 Truth movement and the numerous questions they raise. I am curious if you actually have studied the evidence and arguments related to the fall of WTC7, the NORAD standdown, the molten steel found beneath the rubble, and so forth. If you have, do you feel qualified to sustain any kind of argument relating to these matters? If you have not, why do you feel qualified to disparage the 9/11 Truth movement?
"How do you feel the quality of the voluminous evidence that you cite in your many political books stacks up against the voluminous evidence raised by the 9/11 Truth movement that point towards 9/11 being an 'inside job?' Is there a difference in the quality of evidence presented, and what would that be? If you could give specific examples instead of broad generalizations, it would be much appreciated."
"Earlier, you have brought up the problem that coming to a conclusion on the charges made by the 9/11 Truth movement would require specialized knowledge, such as an advanced knowledge of engineering. Do you feel it is possible for non-specialists to come to conclusions regarding areas involving specialized knowledge? If you do not, I would be curious what your opinion is of our current jury system, where laymen are frequently expected to draw conclusions based on the evidence and arguments presented by experts or specialists in given fields."
(similar) "Earlier, you have brought up the problem that coming to a conclusion on the charges made by the 9/11 Truth movement would require specialized knowledge, such as an advanced knowledge of engineering. Are you aware that David Ray Griffin, one of the leading authors of the 9/11 Truth movement, has written a book, 9/11 Contradictions, that presents 25 major unanswered questions about 9/11 that do not involve any kind of expert knowledge. Are you familiar with this book, and if so, do you feel qualified to answer any of the questions raised by Mr. Griffin? If you are not familiar with this book or at least the arguments it raises, do you still feel qualified to offer an opinion on the 9/11 Truth Movement and its position that 9/11 was an 'inside job'?" [Note: only ask this if you are quite familiar with the book yourself!]
I'm just throwing some ideas out there. :-)
Noam Chomsky has been a NWO asset & left-gatekeeper at
least as far back as the JFK inside job! The man is a traitor & a fraud.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321
I used to like this guy. But:: Now he's a casualty!
In the war for truth he's a casualty!
He can't pass the 911 litmus test, so he's a fake. He is compromised, how he got that way we can only guess! How was Earl Warren compromised? Did Dulles convince him he was saving the world from WWIII? Does Chomsky believe the next false flag will be nuclear or multiple attacks? Who Knows? Why he draws the line on 911 we don't know. He's no help and we need to recognize that in the war for truth we are leaving lots of casualties on the battlefield. It most likely will get worse but this is our best chance to break up the matrix, 911 is the best crack in the illusion we have had, and may ever get for that matter. I think we can expect that the war for truth will get uglier!
Victronix is right on!...marketing...and AJ-PP
At this stage of spreading 9/11 Truth seeking, the single most important point regarding the creation of any assets for "spreading the word", is without any doubt, to consider the audience before creating the info packages.
One of the greatest accomplishments that the 9/11 Truth Movement has developed is the variety of ways that individula truthers have cultivated to "reach" people on the street. Each of us has our personal best approach, and each of us may report the best "angle", or piece of evidence, that seems to relate best to the people in the dispera in which we are "spreading the word" as being very different. Well, the same should go for developing plans and tactics to approach unique groups such as the "Chomsky Diaspera".
I see the above two paragraphs as being similar, but the latter one still more in the developmental and "concept stage". So, Victronix is offering excellent advice, and whomever chastised the "Chomsky Diaspera" is correct in concept yet disasterous in effectiveness of application of that attitude. We have to hold MANY people's hands, and always will because the 9/11 Truth will ALWAYS BE a hot potato until someone is in the Rabbitt Hole. Its just that for people other than the likes of myself, who have always been dubious regarding the pompous nature of such "intellectuals", there is a presumption that "Chomsky will get it...". NOT!
In fact, it was sure easy for me to predict that he would be a 9/11 Truth gatekeeper...DUHHHH! What else could he do? So much for intellectual prowess. Chomsky abuses his "not so very well earned position", and I fall back on the fact that Chomsky and Derschowitz hold world court at the opposite ends of Mass. Ave. in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This juxtaposition of the "opposites" along Mass. Ave is WAY to limiting a range of information and opinion....and of course, its not at all by accident.
Regarding Alex Jones, Prison Planet, the advent of We Are Changes, and The Ron Paul Experiment [all redundant...], it should be obvious to most that their "attack approach" has accomplished its goals and has produced some positive growth. However, its unlikely that there are that many more people out there who react positively to such tactics.
So again, Victronix offers sav vy advice...Don't use the attack approach, don't tie in ANYTHING to the above elements of "The Ron Paul Experiment and Campaign Structure" because people who are in the middle range within the USofA will conclude and react EXACTLY as Victronix postulates.
Its time to refine our approaches and adjust them to reach particular target audiences.
CLEARLY we have the information and we have the skill sets to do so...its just that we have yet to realize that one cannot fix a wrist watch with a hammer...unles one wants to destroy the watch. This is something to think hard and long about because the 9/1 Truith Movement was well established BEFORE WACs, and BEFORE "The Ron Paul Experiment and Campaign Structure" got into the game and took over the 9/11 Truth Movement. Of course, AJ and PP have been in the game all along. Dots anyone?
Lets refine the tools of communication...
Love, Peace and Progress with:
PUBLICALLY FUNDED ELECTIONS using HAND COUNTED PAPER BALLOTS on a NEW PAID FEDERAL VOTING HOLIDAY...just for starters...
Robin Hordon









Thanks
It's well done.
I would include more snippets of the physical evidence (i.e., B7 collapse, Jones lecture, etc.) and also a snippit of the families saying there are lies, because a lot of people will come to look at the film *only* because it has Chomsky in the title and will never have seen the evidence. You could do that in a few short clips. Also, it isn't clear that the Fourteen Points paper is published in a journal, and isn't just featured on a blog from the way it's shown.
My main critique is that I think the promo to Alex Jones and Prison Planet at the end would completely turn Chomsky or any of his supporters off, since AJ is the opposite of what any of them are. They consider themselves thinkers, intellectuals, and will see AJ as a screaming salesman, so that will confirm for them, "Oh, right, this is all about selling DVDs, selling Alex Jones, etc." and they will walk away smugly.
Steve's paper got published in part because they thought a lot about how to reach the audience they were targeting. Chomsky's audience will require similar kid glove handling to reach. What do we agree with Chomsky on (you actually did that very well in the start)?
The clip with him talking about the first bombing was excellent. A very good point.