---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

The former mouthpiece for the treasonous 'decider of thieves' didn't call us crazy, didn't question our patriotism, he just says he hadn't seen evidence and had a different view ("I just don't share your views") and ultimately said "I'm not going to get in the middle of this." Very interesting statement. Middle of what? I thought we were anti-American wackos who needed to take more medication or be put in secret prisons or shot as encouraged by a former president's son . He has acknowledged that there is a debate going on.

the presence and meteoric rise of McClellan's soft criticism of the administration and Bugliosi's hard legal take makes me think that Bush-Cheney might be getting set-up to potentially take the fall for the entire treasonous affair.

We need to remember that Nancy Pelosi, just by taking impeachment off the table, is, under Article III Section 3 of the Constitution, pretty clearly guilty of treason in giving comfort to the executive branch.

Time to press the Democrats and entire Corporatist Media on the treason involved in the 9-11 cover-up.

The 9-11 Cover-Up is Treason!

“Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.” –Plato

"We must speak the truth about terror." --George W. Bush

You folks had a nice little discussion going and the last words were about treason and the like. There are far better ways to go about all of this, and such mannerisms represent the majority of the 9/11 Truthers far better than this type of action.

Please stop confronting, please ask questions, please just get their responses, and maybe you will not get thrown out and actually get MORE information to become public record.

McCllelan is but a tool in the game and confronting him with being treasonous may seem reasonable to most WACers, but it looks exactly the opposite to the public.

And its the public that we want to swing onto our sides at seeing 9/11 Truth...and work like this pushes them away.

But, it feels good doesn't it?

Net loss to the 9/11 Truth Movement...got some rocks off for the WACers though...

Robin Hordon

Seeking comments from people uninformed about WTC 7 likely will be unsuccessful in generating useful or compelling comments.

shows what a weasel scott really is.

"I will not withdraw from this war even if Laura and Barney are the only ones supporting me." -George W. Bush

I suggest that its better to ask more precise questions that simply get folks on the record...and that's all. I do NOT suggest that the process of getting video histories to stop.

It would be wise to understand that ALL those who are hiding/lying, are well onto the Utube approach...and most, like Bill Clinton [and his curly dark haired narcissistic fool that got arrested in the name of 9/11 Truth-or something?], and Bill Maher [and his pre-arranged "reaction" to the Truthers in his audience] , know VERY WELL how to turn each situation right around against us.

It seems to me that the OVERZEALOUS approach comes from people who want the trial and conviction to take place during these TWO MINUTE interviews, or, who want to show how smart they are. I suspect that the thinking is that these characteristics are always a "positive" when reaching out to "the middle". Sadly, nothing could be farther from the truth because these characteristics end up diminishing the interview team.

But it does feel good doesn't it?

This aggressive behavior, ramping up of rhetoric, and specific tactic actually looks rather desparate and it DOES NOT present the best side of the 9/11 Truth Movement...just one undeveloped side.

In fact, such confrontational video clips IF even seen by the common person, will have that citizen conclude that such confrontational questioning that leads from fair questions about important things like PNAC and the WTC7 demolition, and then instantaneously end up with shouts of treason, to be VERY off putting.

As usual in activist movements!

BTW...this EXACT behavior is precisely one of the techniques used by cointelpros and agent provocatuers in the 60s as their job was to keep the peace movement supporters looking like hippe fools and people NOT practicing peace! They accomplished this by always getting personal interactions ramped up to get to some foolish extremes...which of course, would then make it TV.

The current We Are Change confrontaional approach saves the cointelpros a step...we now put it on TV for them.

But it feels good doesn't it?

Don't stop the cameras...simply adjust the approach. Its a win-win-win for 9/11 Truth.

We Know...

Robin Hordon