Recent Headlines
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Recent Media
They will not control us.
Confronting 9/11 commissioner John Lehman
Madeline Albright confronted on Bilderberg and New World Order Crimes including 9/11
WeAreChangeLA Confronts Amy Goodman On Alleged Progressive Media's Blackout And Smear Campaign Of Real 9/11 Investigation
Dr. Graeme MacQueen on Myth and Foreign Policy
US poet JerryMazza RussiaToday August 02, 2009
War on Terror: Expenditures
New DVD - Steven Jones: Nano-Thermite
MI5 officer visited Morocco three times while Binyam Mohamed was tortured
Real Time problems with Bill Maher?
WeAreChangeLA delivers scientific proof of 9/11 TREASON
Richard Gage, AIA and AE911Truth Staff at the Recent AIA Convention in Washington DC
Russia Today covers Richard Gage's efforts in Washington D.C.
AUDIO: Jonathan Cole on WENG Radio, Englewood Fl.
AUDIO: Truth Action Ottawa interviews Cosmos from truthaction.org
VIDEO: Star Wars & False Flag Terrorism 2.0
VIDEO: Annie Machon and Barrie Zwicker
AUDIO: Peter Dale Scott on "Diet Soap"
AUDIO: AE911Truth on KGO AM Radio
VIDEO: Jonathan Kay, "Journalist", comes back for more 9/11 Truth
VIDEO: Dr. Steven Jones at UC Davis - May1, 2009
VIDEO: Richard Gage AIA on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, CA
VIDEO: AE911Truth “Companion” Edition 10-Minute WTC 7 Video
AUDIO: Visibility 9-11 Welcomes John-Michael Talboo and Stewart Bradley of Debunking the Debunkers
Banner Exchange
User login
9/11 Related Sites
911Research.WTC7.net
911speakout.org
911review.com
world911truth.org
911proof.com
truthmove.org
911pressfortruth.com
patriotsquestion911.com
csi911.info
911revisited.com
william911.com
911debunkers.blogspot.com
Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
International Citizens' Inquiry Into 9/11
truthaction.org
911readingroom.org
911reports
9eleven.info
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
deceptiondollar.com
legitgov.org
911omissionreport.com
911tv.org
pnacitizen.org
thedebate.org
grandtheftcountry.com
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
flight93crash.com
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
mime11.com
physics911.net
911docs.net
9/11 International Sites
torontochange.com
911sandhed.nu
www.i11time.dk
reopen911.info
investigar11s.org
911truth.no
911belgium.be
v911truth.org
stoplying.ca
911truth.eu
911truthpeterborough.com
luogocomune.net
911info.se
1192001.dk
11syyskuu.org
serendipity.li
eqgen.nl/aanslagen911
onderzoek911.nl
waarheid911.nl
zapruder.nl
911truthbristol.com
911truthtotnes.com
september11.se
vaken.se
911oz.com
nineeleven.co.uk
hintergrund.de
broeckers.com
thecoop.tv
operation911.de
medienanalyse-international.de
911komplott.de
deepjournal.com
truth4peace.co.uk
911truthskipton.com
wytruth.org.uk
editionsdemilune.com
cremationofcare.com
Investigate 9/11
9/11 Truth Europe
911.yweb.sk
9/11 Memorial Sites
News and Blogs
Wikileaks
Project Censored
Freedoms Phoenix
Cryptome
Truth Alliance Network
Dandelion Salad
The New American Dream
George Washington
The Raw Story
The Real News.com
The Daily Dirt
Better Bad News
Featured Story
infowars.com
meria.net
maxkeiser.com
Ignorance Isnt Bliss
rinf.com
Public Policy News and Research
informationclearinghouse.info
globalresearch.ca
mathaba.net
flybynews.com
Dandelion Salad
Mark Crispin Miller
Pimpin' Turtle
American's Journey
damien911.blogspot.com
Rosie.com
Questioning the War on Terrorism
culhavoc.blogsome.com
arabesque911.blogspot.com
dailypaul.com
BBC - 9/11 - The Third Tower
(See also arie's blog on this. -rep.)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/conspiracy_files/
I'm trying to post the video player, but it won't work for some reason.
You said it Rep: "...It's won't be pretty...."
"The BBC has no vested interest in promoting 9/11 Truth in a positive manner, no matter how benign some of the clips in the above trailer appear."
"...won't be pretty."
Someday, I hope those in the media responsible for distortions and lies find themselves in prison. If the citizens of the world take back their governments, indictments are bound to occur.
+++
+++
If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.
This is so true. If the last
This is so true. If the last BBC attempt at whitewashing the Towers and the Pentagon is any indicator, this will be no different - and conveniently coming out just prior to the new release date (?) of NIST's WTC7 report (that is, of course, unless they extend it even further). I suspect their 'equal time' will amount to the same old, here are the crazy CTers, and here are the logical, sound people you can really trust - you decide!' who always got a great deal more time to develop the 'sit down and shut up' sheeple version of events. I have no optimism with respect to this being any different than all the other mainstream garbage about the 9/11 movement.
They stole the title of my
They stole the title of my short on WTC7!
NIST got their damage estimate of the south side completely wrong:
___________________________________________________________
Please watch my movie: The Third Tower
They DID steal your title,
They DID steal your title, the bastards - but maybe it was a knowlegeable insider . . . : ) . . . and maybe it'll be a good thing in the end, including when people google "Third Tower" in the future . . . ??
Hope it's okay, but I've linked this (your) platinum video The Third Tower 1/2 to all the BlogAds I have running . . . It's accessible when "Read more" is clicked on.
Op Ed News
Blue Jersey
Tim Worstall Tabloid
Classically Liberal
Argue With Everyone
Philadelphia Will Do
The Daily Gotham
UtterlyBoring.com
SUBWAYblogger.com
Room Eight
Consortiumnews
Raw Story
9/11 Blogger
Betsy
Summer of Truth, 2008 (shall rock.)
Cheer up guys!
I'm actually pretty optimistic about this. I certainly hope the BBC has done a much better job this time than with it's previous episode of the Conspiracy Files on 9/11. But, even if it hasn't, this could be the first time that a lot of British people learn that a third tower collapsed on 9/11. They will also see for the first time several video clips of the collapse, which--on their own--make it clear that WTC 7 was brought down in a controlled demolition. Even many people who don't watch the episode will see the videos of the collapse in the promotional adverts for it.
You just need to have to have some faith in the intelligence of viewers and their ability to think for themselves. At the end of the day, it will be what they think that matters, not what the program makers say. (Though, of course, I hope the BBC has done at least a reasonably unbiased job this time.)
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.shoestring911.blogspot.com
BBC Strike Out?
I feel optimistic about the show too, but let's wait and see the whole thing in all its context. We filmed the entire BBC interview as a back up for AE911Truth, in case they distorted or misrepresented anything Richard Gage said.
Richard Clark sold his soul to the dark lord ages ago, Mark Loizeaux apparently hasn't kept up with exotic explosives, nano explosives, Battelle Memorial Institute's work on thermite cutters and military explosives.
Fair and Balanced
I'll tell you, the trailer looked fair and balanced. I think this is mainly to get people to watch...put the argument out there. Then they come in and omit/distort and have the final word...you can pretty much predict this.
Well here's the last advert
Well here's the last advert they had, this seemed relatively fair but the actual program was a totally bias bunch of junk. It's a strategy of making something appear "as if there's something to it" so that the audience becomes interested and then comfortable with the false conclusions they feed them. They’re sick manipulative, Machiavellian scumbag propagandists:
BBC advert for 9/11 "Conspiracy Files"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEQ6NFls0lU
That is what I'm saying.
That is what I'm saying. The trailer is "F&B" as a teaser but the actual show will be a hit piece.
Blatant incoming slick
Blatant incoming slick hit-peice! You can be almost GUARANTEED that by the end of this thing after faking to um and arr and be curious about the issue they'll say: "it wasn't suspect at all, go back to sleep".
Prepare our out counter strike....
What we need to do is prepare our counter strike- Find the best 10 min youtube video about WTC7 and get it ready to email everyone in the world.
Also prepare a interview with Steven Jones and Richard Gage with a detailed critique of the program and debunking the counter arguments- obviously after we have seen the BBC program and if necessary. ( but after the last BBC program I wont hold my breath)
Then we need to get this as wide spread as we can- while WTC7 is still in the public arena. Remember no publicity is bad publicity as we already know the NIST/ BBC argument is gonna be paper thin as 7 years later they have not been able to produce an even slightly plausable senario for the collapse. This is gonna be a big opportunity to publicly take on the NIST report and win!
Exactly
The point of the trailer is to create a mystery to lure in viewers, but as we know, the film itself will be quite the opposite. (Some on here have already been lured in! But we're all human.)
This documentary will likely be no different than a Bigfoot or Moon Hoax documentary, the kind we've all seen, where they show all the "mysteries" that seem so compelling -- "wow, even I was fooled by that one!" -- and then carefully dismantle each point with a series of "experts" that have solved everything, because they are so expert at everything.
The point will be to take the wind out of the "third tower" claim, once and for all since it is timed to coincide (approximately) with the NIST final report on Building 7 in the next month.
But the good thing about this is that now we have a date and a title and a sense of some of it.
Now is the time to start your response on a blog or a website, if you have one, and get it online. Make sure to use "The Third Tower" and "BBC" in your title.
Start your letter to editor.
Start your letter to the BBC, put it in your draft file and be ready to send it.
Start planning a YouTube reponse.
And yes, exactly, don't just email the BBC, email everyone. Let's use this as a launch pad for a campaign to expose the truth of Building 7. The majority, still, have likely never heard of it.
The important thing is to fight the bogus explanation they provide in a massive wave, all at the same time.
Let them do our work for us in reaching the world with this. The explanation will have to be extremely convoluted and the public will get that, no matter how they try to support it.
If they present false evidence or evidence that we cannot see, we need to be prepared. If they do, we need to also be ready with our calls to "stop hiding the evidence from the public" and from scientists and engineers -- AQ never even targeted that building so there should be no "national security" reason to hide evidence.
I think we can turn this against them and in our favor . . .
Great Piece!
Spread it around. Mark Loizeaux is hiding something. Hiding something big.
Of course it's a hit piece...
The very title ridicules questions about the collapse with the title "conspiracy files". Presumably because it's crazy to question how a building fell down when the government can't give us a convincing explanation (or rather none at all) 7 years later. This is ad-hominem propaganda journalism.
... but the promo video looks promising at giving some airtime to the counter arguments. I am not particularly worried about the NIST report. For some strange reason, they did not want to look at certain floors in the building. Give me a break--that's a tip-off to an obvious cover-up.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/conspiracy_files/7433017.stm
They'll have to come up with more convincing arguments than Richard Clarke simply saying, "No, it was not a controlled demolition".
_______________
Arabesque: 911 Truth
Good points. I was thinking
Good points. I was thinking the same thing about Richard Clarke.
The final mystery of 911?
The title says it all doesn't it ? I mean this is it, the last question answered, we can all go back to sleep.
Well it can still backfire on them because no matter how many times they showed the JFK assassination footage and told us it was Oswald shooting from the school book depository behind the President , it never quite sold the public did it. No matter what trick they have up their sleeves this time lots of folks won't buy it and at least the subject will be out in the open. We can debate the naysayers when we know what their case is based on. Pancakes? Sledgehammers? Unique Construction designs? Bring it ON!
Truth will grow
because people generally do have a sense of reason and logic
OK
So did anyone else notice the presence of Barry Jennings in there? Dylan, do you know if he is testifying for OUR side or theirs? Why would he agree to be in their documentary but not yours?
_______________________________________
9/18 was an inside job! So maybe 9/11 was too...
Very good point- does anyone
Very good point- does anyone know?
You'll see in the finished
You'll see in the finished cut.
Essentially, Barry was upset that we made a big deal about the "stepping over people" line. He thought we took him out of context, bla bla bla, asked us to pull his interview.
I set the record straight, though. You'll get to see the actual clip.
Bottom line, Barry said to us, "the firefighter kept saying to us, do not look down, and he said that because ... we were stepping over people. and you can feel when you're stepping over people." We made a fuss about that, and he thought we mis-represented him somehow.
Well Dylan
Is it a hit piece?? Have you seen the final cut??
I also saw no mention of the
I also saw no mention of the molten steel in the trailer- although one person was examining the steel and showing some kind of chemical reaction?
And also the speed at which it collapsed needs to be shouted out!
and show some of the other long burning fires in high rise steel frame buildings.
But hey that was only a 2 min trailer....
Richard Clarke: Building Demo Expert?
In my opinion, all Richard Clarke ever did was create the public perception that an honest government failed to protect Americans from a genuine foreign terrorist enemy, when in fact it seems that elements WITHIN our "protective" government ARE the terrorists.
Secret Keepers
Aidan, I'd start looking at the cells within cells within the government. Think Doug Coe's "Family", Opus Dei's Eric Prince and Joseph Schmidt and their crusader octopus otherwise known as Blackwater. Secrets, big secrets are best kept by expert secret keepers.....like those mentioned here....
I'm not gonna lie ...
I got a little upset once the conversation turned into "Well, Richard Clarke says the gov't couldn't have pulled it off. Is he wrong?", and that footage will be in there. So, I apologize in advance for getting frustrated.
Clarke Is An Odd Addition To A WTC 7 Analysis
Perhaps Clarke can shed some light on the Challenger disaster too.
; )
Richard Clarke and 9/11 = very suspicious
I think there are numerous significant reasons to be highly suspicious of Richard Clarke and his role in 9/11. Here are just a few examples:
1) Along with Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, Clarke was a key player in the top-secret Continuity of Government (COG) program throughout the 1980s and 1990s. Clarke was responsible for implementing COG for the first time ever during the 9/11 attacks. Be sure to read my blog entry "Richard Clarke, 9/11, and the Continuity of Government Plan" for more information on this. I also cite evidence that Clarke--despite his more recent criticisms of the Bush administration--is widely regarded as an aggressive, hawkish conservative by those who have known him.
2) Clarke's account of 9/11 in his book Against All Enemies makes the Bush administration and the US military leaders sound like a bunch of superheroes, desperately trying to protect their country. Even Franklin Miller, who was in the White House Situation Room the morning of 9/11, has claimed that much of Clarke's account is incorrect. See this article from the New York Times.
3) By about 9:05 on 9/11, immediately after second tower was hit, Clarke had concluded that al-Qaeda was behind the attacks, telling Dick Cheney at that time: "It's an al-Qaeda attack and they like simultaneous attacks. This may not be over." Yet how could Clarke figure it out so quickly, with no hard evidence to base his conclusions upon and without any investigation having been conducted?
4) In February 2007, Clarke told an online discussion at Boston.com that the Popular Mechanics book Debunking 9/11 Myths was "a great book," and that people who think 9/11 was an inside job "should all be forced to read it." So this guy is not, nor has ever been, a friend of the 9/11 truth movement.
5) Clarke has profited financially from the "war on terror." Since 2003, he has been the chairman of homeland-security private consulting firm Good Harbor Consulting LLC. This company is described as advising "large corporations, industry associations, and start-ups on homeland security, cybersecurity, critical infrastructure protection and counterterrorism."
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.shoestring911.blogspot.com
The whole idea
of simultaneous attacks is a fake signature.









Get ready...
http://www.911blogger.com/node/14841
'Cuz here it comes.
The best and the brightest proponents of CD at WTC7 had better get ready for the BBC/NIST assault. It won't be pretty. The BBC has no vested interest in promoting 9/11 Truth in a positive manner, no matter how benign some of the clips in the above trailer appear.
Gear up!