Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Blogads

Loose Change: An American Coup DVD

User login

RSS Feeds

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox


Know-nothing Richard A. Clarke Takes Questions from Philly 9/11 Truth

( Home » blogs » Temple911Truth's blog » Know-nothing... )
Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
Submitted by Temple911Truth on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 8:27pm.


Youtube version for slow connections

» login to post comments | 1 point

Questions about Richard Clarke and 9/11

Here are more questions that Richard Clarke needs to be asked:

1) Along with Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, he was a key player in the top-secret Continuity of Government program throughout the 1980s and 1990s. What exactly did his (plus Cheney and Rumsfeld's) role in this program involve?
(See my blog entry "Richard Clarke, 9/11, and the Continuity of Government Plan" for more information on this.)

2) By about 9:05 on 9/11, immediately after second tower was hit, Clarke had concluded that al-Qaeda was behind the attacks, telling Dick Cheney at that time: "It's an al-Qaeda attack and they like simultaneous attacks. This may not be over." How was he able to figure it out so quickly, with no hard evidence to base his conclusions upon and without any investigation having been conducted?

3) In February 2007, he told an online discussion at Boston.com that the Popular Mechanics book Debunking 9/11 Myths was "a great book," and that people who think 9/11 was an inside job "should all be forced to read it." Does he still believe this?

------------------------------------------------------
http://www.shoestring911.blogspot.com

Submitted by Shoestring on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 7:37am.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Thanks guys, that was really great!

However, I just realized -- and I'm admitting that I too have never done this as an activist myself -- you all really need to carry literature on you to give to the people to whom you're asking questions. That way the next time they're approached for an update, they can't say they have no idea what you're talking about.

Forgetting to look into what someone once mentioned to you about an important issue may be somewhat understandable (as one could claim forgetfulness about the details); however, not reviewing the provided literature about that issue is completely lazy and inexcusable.

Submitted by Mekt_Ranzz on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 1:56pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Good job...

I would have been ALL OVER the PEOC, and the wargames taking place that morning... I wish you guys would call me, or email me before you do this so I could possibly help you with questions to ask... like I did for Justin, and Perino, etc...

Edit: Sorry if my original comment came off as "snobby." Not my intention.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Submitted by Jon Gold on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 8:01pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Sibel Edmonds testified in

Sibel Edmonds testified in front of the 9/11 Commission February 11th 2004 (Clarke testified March 24 2004), though you wouldn't learn about Sibel's testimony by going to the 9/11 Commission website. She has a whole single footnote in the 9/11 Commission [9/11 Commission, 7/24/2004, pp. 222; Edmonds, 8/1/2004]. She has been commented on by several individuals, the only people unwilling to talk about Sibel Edmonds are those that are hiding something, e.g. Valerie Plame, Richard Clarke. Clarke should have been confronted with all those who have commented on Sibel so that he wouldn't be able to weasel out of that question so easily.

Submitted by link2zelda on Thu, 06/19/2008 - 1:17am.