Dennis Kucinich Includes 9/11 In Articles Of Impeachment

Dennis Kucinich just introduced 35 articles of impeachment. Number 33 had to do with criminal negligence with regard to 9/11. Number 34 had to do with obstruction of justice with regard to 9/11. Number 35 had to do with how this administration has treated the 9/11 First Responders.

Thank you Dennis Kucinich!

Is there...

A lawyer in the house? :)


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

High Time

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

articles...

Here They Are

Congressman Kucinich has laid out an extensive indictment of the president. Here is the index of article titles:

Full Text: http://chun.afterdowningstreet.org/amomentoftruth.pdf

Article I
Creating a Secret Propaganda Campaign to Manufacture a False Case for War Against Iraq

Article II
Falsely, Systematically, and with Criminal Intent Conflating the Attacks of September 11, 2001, With Misrepresentation of Iraq as a Security Threat as Part of Fraudulent Justification for a War of
Aggression

Article III
Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction, to Manufacture a False Case for War

Article IV
Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Posed an Imminent Threat to the United States

Article V
Illegally Misspending Funds to Secretly Begin a War of Aggression

Article VI
Invading Iraq in Violation of the Requirements of HJRes114

Article VII
Invading Iraq Absent a Declaration of War.

Article VIII
Invading Iraq, A Sovereign Nation, in Violation of the UN Charter

Article IX
Failing to Provide Troops With Body Armor and Vehicle Armor

Article X
Falsifying Accounts of US Troop Deaths and Injuries for Political Purposes

Article XI
Establishment of Permanent U.S. Military Bases in Iraq

Article XII
Initiating a War Against Iraq for Control of That Nation's Natural Resources

Article XIIII
Creating a Secret Task Force to Develop Energy and Military Policies With Respect to Iraq and Other Countries

Article XIV
Misprision of a Felony, Misuse and Exposure of Classified Information And Obstruction of Justice in the Matter of Valerie Plame Wilson, Clandestine Agent of the Central Intelligence Agency

Article XV
Providing Immunity from Prosecution for Criminal Contractors in Iraq

Article XVI
Reckless Misspending and Waste of U.S. Tax Dollars in Connection With Iraq and US Contractors

Article XVII
Illegal Detention: Detaining Indefinitely And Without Charge Persons Both U.S. Citizens and Foreign Captives

Article XVIII
Torture: Secretly Authorizing, and Encouraging the Use of Torture Against Captives in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Other Places, as a Matter of Official Policy

Article XIX
Rendition: Kidnapping People and Taking Them Against Their Will to "Black Sites" Located in Other Nations, Including Nations Known to Practice Torture

Article XX
Imprisoning Children

Article XXI
Misleading Congress and the American People About Threats from Iran, and Supporting Terrorist Organizations Within Iran, With the Goal of Overthrowing the Iranian Government

Article XXII
Creating Secret Laws

Article XXIII
Violation of the Posse Comitatus Act

Article XXIV
Spying on American Citizens, Without a Court-Ordered Warrant, in Violation of the Law and the Fourth Amendment

Article XXV
Directing Telecommunications Companies to Create an Illegal and Unconstitutional Database of the Private Telephone Numbers and Emails of American Citizens

Article XXVI
Announcing the Intent to Violate Laws with Signing Statements

Article XXVII
Failing to Comply with Congressional Subpoenas and Instructing Former Employees Not to Comply

Article XXVIII
Tampering with Free and Fair Elections, Corruption of the Administration of Justice

Article XXIX
Conspiracy to Violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965

Article XXX
Misleading Congress and the American People in an Attempt to Destroy Medicare

Article XXXI
Katrina: Failure to Plan for the Predicted Disaster of Hurricane Katrina, Failure to Respond to a Civil Emergency

Article XXXII
Misleading Congress and the American People, Systematically Undermining Efforts to Address Global Climate Change

Article XXXIII
Repeatedly Ignored and Failed to Respond to High Level Intelligence Warnings of Planned Terrorist Attacks in the US, Prior to 911.

Article XXXIV
Obstruction of the Investigation into the Attacks of September 11, 2001

Article XXXV
Endangering the Health of 911 First Responders

Here...

Is the Full Document.


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Patriot

To see Dennis Kucinich lay out the truth in front of what appeared to be an empty chamber was representative of the state of the country. He did an excellent job. These days it seems like the only trustworthy politicians left are Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul. I know there are a few more scattered around but as far as I'm concerned congress and the MSM have been utterly compromised and discredited.

Articles of Impeachment connected to 9/11...

Article XXXIII
REPEATEDLY IGNORED AND FAILED TO RESPOND TO HIGH LEVEL INTELLIGENCE WARNINGS OF PLANNED TERRORIST ATTACKS IN THE US, PRIOR TO 911

In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed", has both personally and acting through his agents and subordinates, together with the Vice President, failed in his Constitutional duties to take proper steps to protect the nation prior to September 11, 2001.

The White House's top counter-terrorism adviser, Richard A. Clarke, has testified that from the beginning of George W. Bush's presidency until September 11, 2001, Clarke attempted unsuccessfully to persuade President Bush to take steps to protect the nation against terrorism. Clarke sent a memorandum to then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice on January 24, 2001, "urgently" but unsuccessfully requesting "a Cabinet-level meeting to deal with the impending al Qaeda attack."

In April 2001, Clarke was finally granted a meeting, but only with second-in-command department representatives, including Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, who made light of Clarke's concerns.

Clarke confirms that in June, July, and August, 2001, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) warned the president in daily briefings of unprecedented indications that a major al Qaeda attack was going to happen against the United States somewhere in the world in the weeks and months ahead. Yet, Clarke was still unable to convene a cabinet-level meeting to address the issue.

Condoleezza Rice has testified that George Tenet met with the president 40 times to warn him that a major al-Qaeda attack was going to take place, and that in response the president did not convene any meetings of top officials. At such meetings, the FBI could have shared information on possible terrorists enrolled at flight schools. Among the many preventive steps that could have been taken, the Federal Aviation Administration, airlines, and airports might have been put on full alert.

According to Condoleezza Rice, the first and only cabinet-level meeting prior to 9/11 to discuss the threat of terrorist attacks took place on September 4, 2001, one week before the attacks in New York and Washington.

On August 6, 2001, President Bush was presented a President's Daily Brief (PDB) article titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." The lead sentence of that PDB article indicated that Bin Laden and his followers wanted to "follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and 'bring the fighting to America.'" The article warned: "Al-Qa'ida members—including some who are US citizens— have resided in or traveled to the US for years, and the group apparently maintains a support structure that could aid attacks."

The article cited a "more sensational threat reporting that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a US aircraft," but indicated that the CIA had not been able to corroborate such reporting. The PDB item included information from the FBI indicating "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York." The article also noted that the CIA and FBI were investigating "a call to our embassy in the UAE in May saying that a group of Bin Laden supporters was in the US planning attacks with explosives."

The president spent the rest of August 6, and almost all the rest of August 2001 on vacation. There is no evidence that he called any meetings of his advisers to discuss this alarming report. When the title and substance of this PDB article were later reported in the press, then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice began a sustained campaign to play down its significance, until the actual text was eventually released by the White House.

New York Times writer Douglas Jehl, put it this way: "In a single 17-sentence document, the intelligence briefing delivered to President Bush in August 2001 spells out the who, hints at the what and points towards the where of the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington that followed 36 days later."

Eleanor Hill, Executive Director of the joint congressional committee investigating the performance of the US intelligence community before September 11, 2001, reported in mid-September 2002 that intelligence reports a year earlier "reiterated a consistent and constant theme: Osama bin Laden's intent to launch terrorist attacks inside the United States."

That joint inquiry revealed that just two months before September 11, an intelligence briefing for "senior government officials" predicted a terrorist attack with these words: "The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning."

Given the White House's insistence on secrecy with regard to what intelligence was given to President Bush, the joint-inquiry report does not divulge whether he took part in that briefing. Even if he did not, it strains credulity to suppose that those "senior government officials" would have kept its alarming substance from the president.

Again, there is no evidence that the president held any meetings or took any action to deal with the threats of such attacks.

In all of these actions and decisions, President George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President, and subversive of constitutional government, to the prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such conduct, is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office.

Article XXXIV
OBSTRUCTION OF INVESTIGATION INTO THE ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed", has both personally and acting through his agents and subordinates, together with the Vice President, obstructed investigations into the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

Following September 11, 2001, President Bush and Vice President Cheney took strong steps to thwart any and all proposals that the circumstances of the attack be addressed. Then-Secretary of State Colin Powell was forced to renege on his public promise on September 23 that a "White Paper" would be issued to explain the circumstances. Less than two weeks after that promise, Powell apologized for his "unfortunate choice of words," and explained that Americans would have to rely on "information coming out in the press and in other ways."

On Sept. 26, 2001, President Bush drove to Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) headquarters in Langley, Virginia, stood with Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet and said: "My report to the nation is, we've got the best intelligence we can possibly have thanks to the men and women of the C.I.A." George Tenet subsequently and falsely claimed not to have visited the president personally between the start of Bush's long Crawford vacation and September 11, 2001.

Testifying before the 9/11 Commission on April 14, 2004, Tenet answered a question from Commission member Timothy Roemer by referring to the president's vacation (July 29-August 30) in Crawford and insisting that he did not see the president at all in August 2001. "You never talked with him?" Roemer asked. "No," Tenet replied, explaining that for much of August he too was "on leave." An Agency spokesman called reporters that same evening to say Tenet had misspoken, and that Tenet had briefed Bush on August 17 and 31. The spokesman explained that the second briefing took place after the president had returned to Washington, and played down the first one, in Crawford, as uneventful.

In his book, At the Center of the Storm, (2007) Tenet, refers to what is almost certainly his August 17 visit to Crawford as a follow-up to the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the US" article in the CIA prepared President's Daily Brief of August 6. That briefing was immortalized in a Time Magazine photo capturing Harriet Myers holding the PDB open for the president, as two CIA officers sit by. It is the same briefing to which the president reportedly reacted by telling the CIA briefer, "All right, you've covered your ass now." (Ron Suskind, The One-Percent Doctrine, p. 2, 2006). In At the Center of the Storm, Tenet writes: "A few weeks after the August 6 PDB was delivered, I followed it to Crawford to make sure that the president stayed current on events."

A White House press release suggests Tenet was also there a week later, on August 24. According to the August 25, 2001, release, President Bush, addressing a group of visitors to Crawford on August 25, told them: "George Tenet and I, yesterday, we piled in the new nominees for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the Vice Chairman and their wives and went right up the canyon."

In early February, 2002, Vice President Dick Cheney warned then-Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle that if Congress went ahead with an investigation, administration officials might not show up to testify. As pressure grew for an investigation, the president and vice president agreed to the establishment of a congressional joint committee to conduct a "Joint Inquiry." Eleanor Hill, Executive Director of the Inquiry, opened the Joint Inquiry's final public hearing in mid-September 2002 with the following disclaimer: "I need to report that, according to the White House and the Director of Central Intelligence, the president's knowledge of intelligence information relevant to this inquiry remains classified, even when the substance of the intelligence information has been declassified."

The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks, also known as the 9/11 Commission, was created on November 27, 2002, following the passage of congressional legislation signed into law by President Bush. The President was asked to testify before the Commission. He refused to testify except for one hour in private with only two Commission members, with no oath administered, with no recording or note taking, and with the Vice President at his side. Commission Co-Chair Lee Hamilton has written that he believes the commission was set up to fail, was underfunded, was rushed, and did not receive proper cooperation and access to information.

A December 2007 review of classified documents by former members of the Commission found that the commission had made repeated and detailed requests to the CIA in 2003 and 2004 for documents and other information about the interrogation of operatives of Al Qaeda, and had been told falsely by a top C.I.A. official that the agency had "produced or made available for review" everything that had been requested.

In all of these actions and decisions, President George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President, and subversive of constitutional government, to the prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such conduct, is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office.

Article XXXV
ENDANGERING THE HEALTH OF 911 FIRST RESPONDERS

In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed", has both personally and acting through his agents and subordinates, together with the Vice President, recklessly endangered the health of first responders, residents, and workers at and near the former location of the World Trade Center in New York City.

The Inspector General of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) August 21, 2003, report numbered 2003-P-00012 and entitled "EPA's Response to the World Trade Center Collapse:

Challenges, Successes, and Areas for Improvement," includes the following findings:

"[W]hen EPA made a September 18 announcement that the air was 'safe' to breathe, it did not have sufficient data and analyses to make such a blanket statement. At that time, air monitoring data was lacking for several pollutants of concern, including particulate matter and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Furthermore, The White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) influenced, through the collaboration process, the information that EPA communicated to the public through its early press releases when it convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones."

"As a result of the White House CEQ's influence, guidance for cleaning indoor spaces and information about the potential health effects from WTC debris were not included in EPA- issued press releases. In addition, based on CEQ's influence, reassuring information was added to at least one press release and cautionary information was deleted from EPA's draft version of that press release. . . . The White House's role in EPA's public communications about WTC environmental conditions was described in a September 12, 2001, e-mail from the EPA Deputy Administrator's Chief of Staff to senior EPA officials:

"'All statements to the media should be cleared through the NSC [National Security Council] before they are released.'

"According to the EPA Chief of Staff, one particular CEQ official was designated to work with EPA to ensure that clearance was obtained through NSC. The Associate Administrator for the EPA Office of Communications, Education, and Media Relations (OCEMR) said that no press release could be issued for a 3- to 4-week period after September 11 without approval from the CEQ contact."

Acting EPA Administrator Marianne Horinko, who sat in on EPA meetings with the White House has said in an interview that the White House played a coordinating role. The National Security Council played the key role, filtering incoming data on ground zero air and water, Horinko said: "I think that the thinking was, these are experts in WMD (weapons of mass destruction), so they should have the coordinating role."

In the cleanup of the Pentagon following September 11, 2001, Occupational Safety and Health Administration laws were enforced, and no workers became ill. At the World Trade Center site, the same laws were not enforced.

In the years since the release of the EPA Inspector General's above-cited report, the Bush Administration has still not effected a clean-up of the indoor air in apartments and workspaces near the site.

Screenings conducted at the Mount Sinai Medical Center and released in the September 10, 2004, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) of the federal Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), produced the following results:

"Both upper and lower respiratory problems and mental health difficulties are widespread among rescue and recovery workers who dug through the ruins of the World Trade Center in the days following its destruction in the attack of September 11, 2001.

"An analysis of the screenings of 1,138 workers and volunteers who responded to the World Trade Center disaster found that nearly three-quarters of them experienced new or worsened upper respiratory problems at some point while working at Ground Zero. And half of those examined had upper and/or lower respiratory symptoms that persisted up to the time of their examinations, an average of eight months after their WTC efforts ended."

A larger study released in 2006 found that roughly 70 percent of nearly 10,000 workers tested at Mount Sinai from 2002 to 2004 reported that they had new or substantially worsened respiratory problems while or after working at ground zero. This study showed that many of the respiratory ailments, including sinusitis and asthma, and gastrointestinal problems related to them, initially reported by ground zero workers persisted or grew worse over time. Most of the ground zero workers in the study who reported trouble breathing while working there were still having those problems two and a half years later, an indication of chronic illness unlikely to improve over time.

In all of these actions and decisions, President George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President, and subversive of constitutional government, to the prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such conduct, is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office.


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

If Ron Paul was actually with us...

The single most difficult relationship that I have trouble understanding is why those who support Ron Paul, are involved in the 9/11 Truth Movement at all. Every time Ron Paul has had the opportunity to support the 9/11TM on major media outlets, he does the exact opposite and discredits us. Why didn't Ron Paul bring articles of impeachment, including these 9/11 issues, to the floor of congress?

A few months back I went to a Kucinich event in Gray's Harbor, WA to banner the attendees for 9/11 Truth and Peace, and Dennis asked me to stay afterwards because he wanted to ask about some issues regarding 9/11. He needed to be rather quiet about it at that time and his interest was the "put options" so I put him in contact with some good truthers who knew more about that than I.

Since then, and before actually, Kucinich has been quietly asking some questions, making some statements, talking and associating comfortably with 9/11 Truthers, listening to and supporting the first responders, and he has never bad mouthed the 9/11TM as has Ron Paul. Then, not so ironically as far as I am concerened, after Kucinich stopped his presidntial campagning, it turns out that the DLC and their "friends" ran some "interesting" fellows up against Dennis in Ohio. HMMM...sound familiar? Check out his opposition, connect BOTH Clintons with the DLC and who is behind that group, and some dots begin to connect...and here we are back on Manhattan...again. Lets see...a democratic politician asking about 9/11 Truth and the DLC and certain democratic party insiders take action.

It has been my experience over my years of activism that once a growing, powerful and somewhat popular inititive or movement gets underway, many parasitic "movements" seek out the body of the more popular and powerful movement and attach themselves to it. Its pretty historical and certainly predictable actually. And the main reason that these parasites NEED a body to attach themselves too is because the parasitic movements themselves have so little appeal or umph in the eyes of the public that they need something ELSE upon which to "get a ride". If these parasitic movements were strong enough, or appealing enough all in themselves, they wouldn't need a ride, they would be capable of standing alone.

So...

...The Ron Paul Experiment appeals to about 5% of the general population [5-15% of republican votes cast in the primaries]...

...The 9/11 Truth Movement has credibility of 36% of the people as far back as 2006...and has grown since...

...75-80% of the population wants peace and for the USofA to get out of Iraq...

...The Ron Paul Experiment gloms onto the MORE POPULAR 9/11 Truth Movement which makes appealing to the genral population about the truth behind 9/11 even more difficult...

...The Ron Paul Experiment also off-puts the peace movements because it is so fringe and stands against almost all other values expressed by most peace activists, or people wanting peace...

...The Ron Paul Experience gets 8 MILLION DOLLARS in support for his presidential run from the soldiers in IRAQ???...or from some place that Ron Paul doesn't even know the source of...

...And Ron Paul drills the 9/11 Truth Movement whenever he gets the chance...

HMMMMM???? Any room for some very deep questioning here?

If indeed we are "Truth Seekers" as Mike Malloy has long ago coined with his opening welcome every night: "Hello Truth Seekers...", then perhaps its best to seek some truth behind the connections between the 9/11 Truth Movement and The Ron Paul Experiment.

Strange finances, discrediting and confrontational behaviors in public, diminishing two FAR, FAR, FAR larger movements that both focus upon malfeasances within the Pentagon...seems verrrrrry efficient indeed...

And, is it true that the "CHANGE" that We Are Change really wants to become looks like Ron Paul, and behaves as did the protesters from the 60s and 70s...confrontational and disruptive?

Perhaps we should know.

There may be a time and place for impeachment, perhaps after the upcoming election to prevent The Bush Crime Family from pardoning itself and its crooked friends before he leaves office, but for sure, its Dennis Kucinich who is making the case now. As far as a "place" is concerned, putting ANYTHING in front of THIS congress guarantees that it gets buried forever...its really that simple because they are ALL really that guilty or complicit, and certainly part of the big scam.

Anyway, where is Ron Paul and why didn't HE take such a stand and offer articles of impeachment?

Perhaps its because The Ron Paul Experiment isn't an experiment at all!

Love, Peace and Progress with:

PUBLICALLY FUNDED ELECTIONS using HAND COUNTED PAPER BALLOTS on a NEW PAID FEDERAL VOTING HOLIDAY

Robin Hordon

PS: BTW..If you want to know what Kucinich thinks, just ask...it refreshing because he will answer.

We MADE...

Ron Paul, and then he stabbed us in the back.


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Robin, I agree with you

Robin, I agree with you 100%!

Justin A. Martell
www.sst911.org
jamartell.blogspot.com

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

Pretty Cool.

Free Bees: 9/11’s a Lie (Stayin’ Alive)

YouTube
June 9, 2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PqXw6mS2KA

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Jon...

I don't say this much but I almost 100% disagree with this statement.

"and he stabbed us in the back..."

I'll touch base this week sometime and we can talk about why.
Also needed to get in touch with you RE: the FGF.

Hope all is well!

Regards,
Mark in Philly
http://www.FealGoodFoundation.com

He got on...

National TV during a debate, was asked about 9/11, couldn't even say he supports the families' call for a real investigation, and instead, denounced us. Would Cynthia McKinney do that? We gave him funds, attention, and started him on his journey for the Presidency. He gave us nothing. I understand that you probably think he's being "smart" to get into office by avoiding the 9/11 issue, but I would much rather have someone honest AND smart than just smart.


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Jon

as a FORMER early and ardent supporter of Ron Paul I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU.

Pls see more info exposing Ron Paul at :

Why the Double Standards? Can't We Hold Our Congressional Representatives to Full Accountability?

http://911blogger.com/node/14834

Ron Paul needs to explain his positions to the Freedom and Patriot Movement, INCLUDING his absurd stand on IMPEACHMENT.

....Why does Ron Paul have this view on IMPEACHMENT?

http://www.lahontanvalleynews.com/article/20071215/News/112150044

"........Paul told the LVN earlier that the decision to invade Iraq in 2003 without a declaration of war by Congress was the most egregious violation of the Constitution in the last 20 years. But when asked why he hasn't supported the impeachment of President Bush, Paul responded that impeachment is the duty of the opposing party, and he would have to consider if a president willfully or ignorantly deserved impeachment before making a decision....."

Is that a proper Constitutional Position? Ron Paul thinks that it is only the duty of the opposition to Impeach.

And he has to "consider" if the President deserved impeachment. Amazing and Shocking........

Wake up people.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Paul still needs to co-sponser

the first responder bill H.R. 3543

If anyone here is from his district or even in Texas or even an American, please call his DC office & push them to do the right thing. (202) 225-2831

No...

.. I think he's being smart in playing 'the game'.
Look what happened to Kucinich the minute he mentioned 9/11.

I think, actually pretty much know, that he's taking a different approach.
The truth movement see's 9/11 as the lynchpin to the problems going on in the world - and our country.

Paul, et al, see the financial situation as the problem. He has elected, because he is a scholar of Mises Economics, to draw his bandwagon around this issue, because he knows he has a fighting chance to really make a difference with this. I am not saying that him not calling for a new 9/11 Investigation because family members want it has any merit for an excuse, but what I am saying is he is just taking a different approach. The 'conspiracy' of the federal reserve is more accepted by the MSM, and quite frankly, can expose a great deal in and of itself.

And... if the truth movement and all take a look into Mises Economics and those scholars which study it, they KNOW what is going on. They understand everything, but just like the 9/11 truth movement rallies behind 9/11 as our lynchpin, they rally around abolishing the fed, creating a currency worth something other than ink and paper, etc.

I'm at work. But let's base this week sometime and I'll explain more.

Regards,
Mark in Philly
http://www.FealGoodFoundation.com

Solving "9/11", without solving the FRN...

Solves nothing.

Solving the FRN... cascades to solving 9/11, Social Security, education, labor, MIC, drug war, martial law...

Is 911blogger unable to solve this?

Jon, please give this person a healthy bit of your ear time to consider this.

Sincere thanks,
Erin

Awesome. Summer of Truth,

Awesome.

Summer of Truth, 2008 has hit the ground running!

Thank you, Dennis Kucinich . . . If only Obama would pick YOU!

Betsy