got a chance to hear this . After Jesse left, it really pissed me off to hear Fred talk out his a**. Come on guys! Grow the hell up ! It's fine to joke around about common sh*t, but after hearing the responces to Jesse's comments one can tell why getting the truth out is so difficult.
NOW YOU KNOW WHY THEY GOT AWAY WITH IT !..............WAKE UP AMERICA !
P.S. Could Howard be that stupid not to look into 9/11? Could he be even more stupid not to question it?

(whoops, meant to post this under drunhorse's comment) I could understand your reaction to Stern, but I try to focus on the good this interview can achieve instead...now if you wanna talk retards...how about his mentally lame sidekicks who swallowed the Bush pill hook line and sinker, with their asshole commentary afterwards.....

Subscribing to Sirius is SO worth it - not just for this amazing interview with JV, but for listening to all (okay, most) of the hosts on channel 146 Left Talk . . . at least two (Mike Malloy and Lynn Samuels) are 100% 9/11 Truth advocates . . . .

Sirius's channel 146 has been a lot cheaper than therapy these last three years for me at least . . . . : )

"the next Obama Adminastration" - You say that as if Obama is not just another establishment puppet?

The elites apparently manufactured the charismatic, 'cult of personality' and phony 'outsider' Obama because they likely sensed that America is fed up with the status quo and are ready to turn to a Jesse Ventura or Ron Paul. It also seems that CFR member Bloomberg's whispered independent presidential run only seemed to get shelved when Ron Paul advised he wouldn't run as an independent.

Obama's advisor is Zbigniew Brzezenski.

And Zbigniew Brzezenski is a close associate of David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger and other corrupt 'insiders'.

Obama's wife is a member of what only recently was referred to as a Chicago wing of the Council on Foreign Relations:

http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/chicago_council_board_directors.php

WHY IN THE WORLD IS NO ONE QUESTIONING HOW OBAMA SIMPLY CAME OUT OF ALMOST NOWHERE AND IS NOW ON THE DOORSTEP OF THE WHITE HOUSE?

Obama wouldn't be where he is unless the establishment wanted him there.

the Bilderberg Group & Council on Foreign Relations to be a frontrunner for president of this country! (Obama needs to be totally "vetted" among many other things before I would trust him.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321

You mean "Grand Chessboard" Brzezinski?

"...The last decade of the twentieth century has witnessed a
tectonic shift in world affairs. For the first time ever, a
non-Eurasian power has emerged not only as a key arbiter of
Eurasian power relations but also as the world's paramount
power. The defeat and collapse of the Soviet Union was the
final step in the rapid ascendance of a Western Hemisphere
power, the United States, as the sole and, indeed, the first
truly global power... (p. xiii)

"... But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian
challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus
of also challenging America. The formulation of a
comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is
therefore the purpose of this book. (p. xiv)

"The attitude of the American public toward the external
projection of American power has been much more ambivalent.
The public supported America's engagement in World War II
largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack
on Pearl Harbor. (pp 24-5)

"For America, the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia... Now
a non-Eurasian power is preeminent in Eurasia - and
America's global primacy is directly dependent on how long
and how effectively its preponderance on the Eurasian
continent is sustained. (p.30)

"America's withdrawal from the world or because of the
sudden emergence of a successful rival - would produce
massive international instability. It would prompt global
anarchy." (p. 30)

"In that context, how America 'manages' Eurasia is critical.
Eurasia is the globe's largest continent and is
geopolitically axial. A power that dominates Eurasia would
control two of the world's three most advanced and
economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map
also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost
automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the
Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to
the world's central continent. About 75 per cent of the
world's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's
physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises
and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for 60 per cent of
the world's GNP and about three-fourths of the world's known
energy resources." (p.31)

It is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to
be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's
power, especially its capacity for military intimidation.
Never before has a populist democracy attained international
supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that
commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden
threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-
being. The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending)
and the human sacrifice (casualties, even among professional
soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to
democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization." (p.35)

"Two basic steps are thus required: first, to identify the
geostrategically dynamic Eurasian states that have the power
to cause a potentially important shift in the international
distribution of power and to decipher the central external
goals of their respective political elites and the likely
consequences of their seeking to attain them;... second, to
formulate specific U.S. policies to offset, co-opt, and/or
control the above..." (p. 40)

"...To put it in a terminology that harkens back to the more
brutal age of ancient empires, the three grand imperatives
of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and
maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep
tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians
from coming together." (p.40)

"Henceforth, the United States may have to determine how to
cope with regional coalitions that seek to push America out
of Eurasia, thereby threatening America's status as a global
power." (p.55)

"Uzbekistan, nationally the most vital and the most populous
of the central Asian states, represents the major obstacle
to any renewed Russian control over the region. Its
independence is critical to the survival of the other
Central Asian states, and it is the least vulnerable to
Russian pressures." (p. 121)

Referring to an area he calls the "Eurasian Balkans" and a
1997 map in which he has circled the exact location of the
current conflict - describing it as the central region of
pending conflict for world dominance - Brzezinski
writes: "Moreover, they [the Central Asian Republics] are of
importance from the standpoint of security and historical
ambitions to at least three of their most immediate and more
powerful neighbors, namely Russia, Turkey and Iran, with
China also signaling an increasing political interest in the
region. But the Eurasian Balkans are infinitely more
important as a potential economic prize: an enormous
concentration of natural gas and oil reserves is located in
the region, in addition to important minerals, including
gold." (p.124) [Emphasis added]

"The world's energy consumption is bound to vastly increase
over the next two or three decades. Estimates by the U.S.
Department of energy anticipate that world demand will rise
by more than 50 percent between 1993 and 2015, with the most
significant increase in consumption occurring in the Far
East. The momentum of Asia's economic development is already
generating massive pressures for the exploration and
exploitation of new sources of energy and the Central Asian
region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain
reserves of natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait,
the Gulf of Mexico, or the North Sea." (p.125)

"Uzbekistan is, in fact, the prime candidate for regional
leadership in Central Asia." (p.130)

"Once pipelines to the area have been developed,
Turkmenistan's truly vast natural gas reserves augur a
prosperous future for the country's people. (p.132)

"In fact, an Islamic revival - already abetted from the
outside not only by Iran but also by Saudi Arabia - is
likely to become the mobilizing impulse for the increasingly
pervasive new nationalisms, determined to oppose any
reintegration under Russian - and hence infidel - control."
(p. 133).

"For Pakistan, the primary interest is to gain Geostrategic
depth through political influence in Afghanistan - and to
deny to Iran the exercise of such influence in Afghanistan
and Tajikistan - and to benefit eventually from any pipeline
construction linking Central Asia with the Arabian Sea."
(p.139)

"Turkmenistan... has been actively exploring the
construction of a new pipeline through Afghanistan and
Pakistan to the Arabian Sea..." (p.145)

"It follows that America's primary interest is to help
ensure that no single power comes to control this
geopolitical space and that the global community has
unhindered financial and economic access to it." (p148)

"China's growing economic presence in the region and its
political stake in the area's independence are also
congruent with America's interests." (p.149)

"America is now the only global superpower, and Eurasia is
the globe's central arena. Hence, what happens to the
distribution of power on the Eurasian continent will be of
decisive importance to America's global primacy and to
America's historical legacy." (p.194)

"Without sustained and directed American involvement, before
long the forces of global disorder could come to dominate
the world scene. And the possibility of such a fragmentation
is inherent in the geopolitical tensions not only of today's
Eurasia but of the world more generally." (p.194)

"With warning signs on the horizon across Europe and Asia,
any successful American policy must focus on Eurasia as a
whole and be guided by a Geostrategic design." (p.197)

"That puts a premium on maneuver and manipulation in order
to prevent the emergence of a hostile coalition that could
eventually seek to challenge America's primacy..." (p. 198)

"The most immediate task is to make certain that no state or
combination of states gains the capacity to expel the United
States from Eurasia or even to diminish significantly its
decisive arbitration role." (p. 198)

"In the long run, global politics are bound to become
increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of hegemonic
power in the hands of a single state. Hence, America is not
only the first, as well as the only, truly global
superpower, but it is also likely to be the very last."
(p.209)

"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural
society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a
consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the
circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct
external threat." (p. 211)

/////////////////////////////////
Great minds ... think for themselves.

duplicate

Are you voting down the "cliffs' notes" of this book by Brzezinski because it's too long???

Have you even READ it?

/////////////////////////////////
Great minds ... think for themselves.

Do you really think if there is not a stolen election and martial law, that an elected Obama will stand for 9/11 truth? Obama can stuff his HOPE and CHANGE, he's a shill like the rest and he's full of shit.

Sit, be still, and listen
Because you are drunk --
And we are at
the edge of the roof.

-Rumi

Who would have thunk JFK was going to dismantle the CIA and bypass the Federal Reserve??? But he attempted to do that. So to say you know this or that about Obama seems a little over predictive of the future I think.