if the host of that show gets fired I hope there will be a post about it. heh

Congratulations To Dylan Avery.

The truth really start to come out on MSM. That's good to see.

I'm aware of the truth mouvement for one month now and I'm about to start my own blog (in french) to spread the truth among my friends and relatives.

P.S. Love the 911Blogger.com. Mostly wise people here.

And occasionally I'm here too.

Hey, Northern Frenchy, where are you from? Loose Change viewing in Toronto on May 26 if you can make it.

"And occasionally I'm here too."

That's great if we want a WISE ASS.

"And occasionally I'm here too."

That's great if we want a WISE ASS.
Jon Gold | Homepage | 05.18.06 - 1:03 pm | #

There is a fine line between a Wise Man, a Wise Guy, and a Wise Ass.

C-Span is bombed regularly with the Truth. Gotta love it!!

Yes, and some Canuckers helping out now and then wouldn't hurt either.

Did you guys know that Doug Thompson attacked a certain theory within the movement yesterday?

dz:

fine line between madness and genius too.

"fine line between madness and genius too."

I go back and forth between that line all the time.

Jon:
I've erased the line. It's quite a party going on up here.

"Hey, Northern Frenchy, where are you from? Loose Change viewing in Toronto on May 26 if you can make it.

somebigguy | Homepage | 05.18.06 - 1:02 pm | # "

sbg, I'm from Quebec City. I've already seen LC2E and a LOT of 911 related film on the net.

Got to go back to work...

"I've erased the line. It's quite a party going on up here."

Wheeeeeee!!!

Do any of you guys like System of a Down? :)

Does anyone know how big of a release LC Final Cut will get? Is it going on the big screen?

Mike,

Do any of you guys like System of a Down?

only if by 'like' you mean constantly listen to all their albums.. ;)

T-Bone,

you might find more about that on the official loose change blog.. all i know is they are working on 'final cut' and have received some form of distribution to play on the big screen - what distribution company, and how many screens i have no idea.

Hell yeah dz.

Help going up in the ranking EVERYBODYS GOTTA LEARN SOMETIME too.
It provides informations very complementary to those ones of LC2.
1 or 2 clicks a day.. (no more because it has an anti-trick system)

“If the glove doesn’t fit; you must acquit”

For some reason that phrase is beginning to ring in my head when I think of the “No Plane Theory”. I make this statement in spite of the fact that I don’t believe flight 77 actually struck the Pentagon. But after reading post by a number of “regulars” (such as Jon Gold) on 911 Blogger website, who suggests staying away from the “No Plane Theory” because it is yet to be 100% provable. I guess I have finally begun to see the light. I say this because of what happened in the “Trial of the Century” which O.J. Simpson was on trail for killing his Ex-Wife Nicole and her lover Ronald. In that trial, if one would have considered the overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence that was presented by the prosecution, that person should be compelled to think O.J. Simpson was guilty as sin. But despite all of this evidence, the prosecution (mainly, cry baby Christopher Darden) made a fatal error to their case. He was allowed to have O.J. put on the bloody glove without knowing for a fact if it would fit on his hand. And we all know what happened when O.J. attempted to put on the glove. And we also know the phrase Johnnie Cochran used repeatedly in his closing argument. “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit”. Later Cochran commented that Darden broke a cardinal rule when presenting a case. Never present something as evidence without knowing the outcome. In other words a good trial lawyer never asks a question without already knowing the answer. Because of Darden’s error in judgment, the credibility of all the other evidence presented in that trial was destroyed.

Therefore, when I consider the 2 tapes released a few day ago, showing the Pentagon exploding. They lead me to think that Flight 77 did not strike the Pentagon. But still, when I consider that there is rumored to be 84 other tapes that could possibly show Flight 77 striking the Pentagon, I think it is a safer bet to see what are on those tapes before I endorse the “No Plane Theory”. Even though it is very tempting to jump on the bandwagon and tell everyone I know that the size of the hole in the building is not consistent with a 757 jetliner. I must also be careful not to ruin the mountain of evidence at the World Trade Center that is much more convincing because of the tons of footage of the building imploding at free fall speed, and victims saying they heard explosive going off while evacuating. So I asked myself; When taking all the evidence as a whole, is it better that I concede to the Official Version that flight 77 struck the pentagon, thereby allowing it to bleed to a slow death, and while observing safely at a distance? Or should we go for a more convincing quick kill by going for the jugular with the “No Plane Theory”, while having to get close to our victim giving him a last chance to strike us. I would rather play it safe by conceding to the Official Version that flight 77 did strike the Pentagon knowing that I have all the rest of the cards in my favor. I think it would be better to focus on all the strange occurrences before the Pentagon strike, because it would be allot easier to prove. For instance the Pentagon is supposedly the most fortified building in the world; with a missile defense system, and jet fighters only 11 miles away. Yet they all strangely failed to protect the building that day. And there are many other strange occurrences such as a amateur pilot flying a 100 ton jet liner with pin-point accuracy. This same person could not fly a single propeller plane a few weeks earlier. I think by bringing enough of these strange occurrences to light, we could cast enough doubt on the Official Version of the Pentagon Strike, without putting our credibility on the line with the risky “No Plane Theory”.

Please send comment to this guy at CBC

http://www.cbc.ca/thehour/contactus.html

I was so surprised to see any MSM, even in Canada broaching the subject of 9/11.

I've been bugging our national coverage (Canadian) for a couple of years.

Both of our national news outlets reported "Pentagon releases new VIDEO showing flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon" So bogus for them to describe a few blurry frames as video and continue to report U.S. MSM party line.

Thanks to all for your efforts. We will break through.

Sharptooth