Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Blogads

Loose Change: An American Coup DVD

User login

RSS Feeds

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox


Iranian President Ahmadinejad: US used September 11 as 'pretext' for invasions

( Home » Iranian President... )
Submitted by Reprehensor on Tue, 04/08/2008 - 7:10pm.

(Now, where would the Iranian President get an idea like that in his head? Perhaps he has been hanging around with the Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who says that he warned the US of an attack, 12 days before 9/11. Maybe not so high up, could have just been Mohamed Hassanein Heikal – Former Foreign Minister of Egypt. Or perhaps he has been hanging around with Russian President Putin, the Russian intelligence warned us, too. No, more likely just General Ivashov. Maybe it was former German defense ministry official Dr. Johannes B. Koeppel, who thinks 9/11 was a pretext for global dictatorship. Or perhaps it was the former head of German secret services, Horst Ehmke. Or German Defense insider Andreas Von Beulow. Theoretically, it could have been Pakistani General Mirza Aslam Beg. It's really hard to say. He doesn't have his facts straight, but that's nothing new for Ahmadinejad. The AFP reporter is also quick to point out Ahmadinejad's stupid position on the Holocaust, another great reason for 9/11 Truthers to stay the hell away from that topic. -rep.)

(rawstory has given the story a nod.)

Ahmadinejad: US used September 11 as 'pretext' for invasions
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080408/wl_mideast_afp/iranusattacksahmadin...

by Aresu Eqbali
Tue Apr 8, 2:38 PM ET

TEHRAN (AFP) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused the United States on Tuesday of using the September 11, 2001 attacks as a "pretext" to launch invasions and cast doubt on the accepted version of the terror strikes.

"On the pretext of this incident a major military operation was launched and oppressed Afghanistan was attacked. Tens of thousands of people have been killed until now," he said in a speech broadcast on state television.

"Poor Iraq was attacked. According to official figures... one million people have been killed," he said in the speech marking Iran's day of nuclear technology.

Continued...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080408/wl_mideast_afp/iranusattacksahmadin...

» login to post comments | printer friendly version
» login to post comments | 4 points

Another Smoking Gun in my opinion.!!

If you were warned 12 days ago about an impending attack by the Egyptian President, would you go ahead with war games that left you completely undefended. I could see possibly in times of complete peace or perceived security, but right after a warning like that. NO WAY.

Submitted by Orangutan. on Tue, 04/08/2008 - 7:38pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

There were warnings all over the place

Including one from the Director of the CIA - warning congress that there was going to be an "imminent" attack on the United States "of this nature"...
http://www.thememoryhole.org/tenet-911.htm

____________________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!" -Dr. Frank Greening

Submitted by stallion4 on Tue, 04/08/2008 - 8:04pm.
» login to post comments | 2 points

Looks like he is about to

Looks like he is about to get the same treatment that Iraq and Afghanistan got, based upon lies, and he knows it.

Of course he is wrong about the names of 3000 victims not being published.
Either, as you suggest he does not have his facts straight, OR he misspoke, was misquoted or misinterpreted, BUT that is what will be seized upon by the MSM propagandist pundits on behalf of the "complex". That, and questioning the official holocaust numbers.

They will skillfully ignore that "He also asked how it was possible that advanced radar and intelligence systems did not detect the planes before they hit the towers of the World Trade Centre in New York."

That of course is also not quite correct (swap "detect" with "intercept" and we have it) . But again, i would not take for granted that they are quoting him or reporting correctly. They have deliberately misquoted him in the past regarding Israel.

Thanks for all the embedded links of the warnings. Great Stuff!

- Fraser Valley 9/11 Truth http://www.FV911Truth.org
- 9/11 Civil Information Blog http://911civilinfo.blogspot.com
... it's the other War on Terrrorism ... silly!

Submitted by adanac on Tue, 04/08/2008 - 8:19pm.
» login to post comments | 3 points

All the "warnings" were probably leaked on purpose.

I think the conspirators deliberately leaked, through many channels, that OBL was planning a big operation like 911; that way, when it happens, people have already been subconsciously manipulated to believe that it *was* OBL, no questions asked, and no wasteful investigation needed. Moreover, the conspirators also have the makings of an "incompetence" defense.

Submitted by jpsmith123 on Tue, 04/08/2008 - 10:22pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Bingo

These fictions should not be taken at face value. All we really know is that the buildings were blown up and that is what killed most of the people and injured many more. What came before is irrelevant to what killed most of the people, other than as an utterly implausible explanation. (This is also what bothers me about saying "and a plane didn't hit WTC7," as if a plane hitting means anything.)

Submitted by Dwightvw on Wed, 04/09/2008 - 3:28pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

President Ahmadinejad's

President Ahmadinejad's Letter to Bush May 2006 questioning 911

http://911blogger.com/node/14845

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/09_05_06ahmadinejadletter.pdf

"....Mr President,

September Eleven was a horrendous incident. The killing of innocents is deplorable and
appalling in any part of the world. Our government immediately declared its disgust with the
perpetrators and offered its condolences to the bereaved and expressed its sympathies.
All governments have a duty to protect the lives, property and good standing of their citizens.
Reportedly your government employs extensive security, protection and intelligence systems
– and even hunts its opponents abroad. September eleven was not a simple operation. Could it
be planned and executed without coordination with intelligence and security services – or
their extensive infiltration? Of course this is just an educated guess. Why have the various
aspects of the attacks been kept secret? Why are we not told who botched their
responsibilities? And, why aren’t those responsible and the guilty parties identified and put
on trial? ......"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Submitted by constitutional911 on Wed, 04/09/2008 - 4:06am.
» login to post comments | 3 points

"First Time" Ahmadinejad questions 9/11? Hardly!

Apparently the corporate media want you to focus on this interview with the mistake about the publication of victims' names, and forget the earlier, more eloquent statements including his interview with 60 Minutes' Scott Pelley:

http://www.mujca.com/ahmadinejad.htm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/21/60minutes/main3286706_page5.sh...

AHMADEINEJAD: Well, you shouldn't speak on behalf of the American people... The American people still don't know who was behind the bombing of the Twin Towers. Many books in the U.S. have been written about the incident., and there are questions circling in your society. Once you go back, go to the streets, ask the local people who was behind this, what were the reasons for that? And, again, I fail to see why you continually say “the American people.“ I have the latest surveys. Eighty percent of the American citizens say that the American government knew about the attack beforehand. They had information.

PELLEY: You don't believe that, sir.

AHMADEINEJAD: I'm not making a judgment here, mind you. I'm not being judgmental. That's not important for me. What is important for me is to find out why this happened.

Submitted by Kevin Barrett on Wed, 04/09/2008 - 8:55am.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Kevin

Perhaps you can BLOG on this and cover the Iranian Govt's perspective on all of this.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Submitted by constitutional911 on Wed, 04/09/2008 - 9:21am.