Yes. Yes, he has been to one. Then he talked shit about it.

"The Red Herrings Of 9/11"
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0405/S00066.htm

Eliciting this response from Carol Broulliet;

"Re. Daniel Hopsicker On The 911 Inquiry"
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0405/S00076.htm

---------------------------

Two years later;

http://www.gnn.tv/B16446

(Carol responds in this one too, scroll down at link.)

I contacted George (one of the gentlemen putting on the conference) directly, and let him know some of my concerns. Ultimately, it is up to the organizers of these conferences to do the background work on the people that they invite, they should also have remarks or an outline submitted from the speakers, so when a speaker goes off topic. Or WAY OFF TOPIC, you can pull the plug on them, and be justified in doing so.

Though not entirely unknown to me. I had heard he bad mouthed the movement. If he goes off topic, as you said, and starts bad mouthing the movement, and everyone there, he obviously shouldn't be allowed to continue. However, to my knowledge, some of his work is still cited. I would personally like to ask him about this.

Regardless, his work is all over the Terror Timeline and is cited very often. Who else has knocked on doors and put his neck on the chopping block the way Hopsicker has? He showed up two months after 9/11 to see what the deal was with Florida and the flight schools. Is the movement not all about being accepting of different ideas and believes? I think he was pretty harsh in his critisicm but I can understand his frustrations. His work has proven valuable in showing the official story false, especially the FBI's timeline of the hijackers. The debunkers don't say much about Hopsicker's work other than that Amanda Keller lied about her time with Atta, from one mainstream article! I say we should hear what he has to say and not forget that we aren't just the movement of controlled demolition.

Justin A. Martell
www.sst911.org
jamartell.blogspot.com

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

anything but a devout Muslim martyr. Atta was shown to be a punk, alcoholic, (coke-head too I think) womanizer, & wannabe Mafioso/drug smuggler type. (And I don't believe Atta did all that to fit-in with the "infidels." Atta's antics seriously jeopardized the entire "mission" on at least 1 or 2 occasions.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321

In addition to the Keller retraction there is a lot of evidence that indicates Atta was a serious religious architecture student.

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/atta/default.htm

We have Keller's retraction and physical appearance discrepancies.

Keller said comments attributed to her in the Herald-Tribune on Saturday, saying that Atta lived in her apartment, were wrong. She said that it was this unidentified fifth man, also named Mohammed, that stayed in her home.

The fifth man being eyed by investigators was tall, lanky and quiet, according to Keller's mother and sister.

http://www.madcowprod.com/fifthpilot.htm

An FDLE agent working in conjunction with the FBI arrived at the LaConca home around 10:30 a.m. Thursday and questioned the couple for two hours concerning a man they knew only as "Mohamed."

The couple told the agent the man was about 25, 5 feet 10 inches, 160 pounds, had "dark, perfect" skin, and was clean cut and "very polite."

http://www.sun-herald.com/NewsArchive2/091401/tp4ch14.htm

Why dismiss the accounts of the serious architecture student yet accept the validity of the stripper's bizarre story?

Why don't you come to the conference and ask Hopsicker about it?

Justin A. Martell
www.sst911.org
jamartell.blogspot.com

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

by far exceeds any reservations I have about Hopsicker. Jon asked about it, and anybody with teh 'google' could bring that stuff up, so I thought I would just go ahead and post it myself.

It's going to be a great conference judging by all the other people you have coming.

As I live in the SF Bay Area I've heard about Mr. Hopsicker's sour grapes for years from Carol, Ken and others, but have never actually read what he wrote or the responses.

Perhaps he will make peace at this conference as there has been enough time and research at this point to see that there is much more to the 9/11 operation.

I hope so, but if not that will be noteworthy, as well.

I'd love to go as I also have a favorite cousin in N.H. I haven't seen in a long time. Mr. Springmann alone, makes it worth the trip, imo.

Thanks again for posting the links.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Are worth the price of admission.

Springmann also appeared at dc911truth's conference in November, 2006. He is a very sincere and credible presenter.

Did not know that. Yes, he is very credible.

No one I've ever talked to in the 9/11 Truth movement is LIHOP. Because we all know it's like dividing one by zero. Impossible. As Jon explains.

Anyone claiming themselves to be LIHOP is just in a stage . . . their critical thinking hasn't stepped down (up? maybe thinking of going down the rabbit hole) yet to the next stage to realize . . .

Why some keep bringing up LIHOP to attack others with that label is beyond me. We're all supposed to be on the same side, the same team, fighting for the same truths and justice. This LIHOP issue, used by some is just a strawman - perhaps used for selfish purposes.

Anyone involved in this 9/11 "thing" should be supported and thanked for their efforts that go "above and beyond" like the organizers of this New England 9/11 Symposium.

My advice (not that you asked): listen to honest and fair criticism but ignore the negativity that can be so draining . . .

Of anyone that uses the LIHOP/MIHOP terms anymore. They're nothing but divisive.