Help Support The Site

The Agonist Learning Center

Learn more online. Collecting answers for over 5 years.

Adherents.com

Your online authority for church statistics and world religion geography for 15 years.


Reps. Nadler, Lofgren Investigate Status Of Compensation For 9/11 Illnesses

These hearings apparently were explosive. A Republican shill named Rep. Darrell Issa had a few things to say. For instance, "It's very simple: I can't vote for additional money for New York if I can't see why it would be appropriate to do this every single time a similar situation happens, which quite frankly includes any urban terrorist. It doesn't have to be somebody from al Qaeda. It can be someone who decides that they don't like animal testing at one of our pharmaceutical facilities." Also, the dust wasn't so bad. "It simply was an aircraft, residue of the aircraft and residue of the materials used to build this building." If anyone can find the video of these proceedings which were apparently on C-SPAN, it would be much appreciated. - Jon

Hearing Marks First Congressional Inquiry into Economic Losses of Individuals

Source: house.gov

4/1/2008

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Jerrold Nadler (NY-08), Chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (CA-16), Chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law today held a joint oversight hearing titled, “Paying With Their Lives: The Status of Compensation for 9/11 Health Effects.”

“I am outraged that more than six years after 9/11, the heroes of that day are still waiting for the help they deserve,” said Rep. Nadler. “The federal government not only failed to protect those who died on 9/11, but it also bears responsibility for not preventing the injuries of thousands more. Obviously, none of this would have occurred were it not for the terrorists, but many of the injuries we are seeing today could have been avoided. Therefore, the federal government has a moral and legal obligation to compensate the living victims of 9/11, to provide for their health, and to attempt to make them whole for their subsequent financial losses. I am confident that, through this investigation, we can find the best way to do so, and I believe it will highlight the necessity for the House to act on the Maloney-Nadler-Fossella 9/11 Health and Compensation Act.”

“Congress has an obligation to ensure that the programs it created to assist the victims of 9/11 function efficiently and effectively,” noted Rep. Zoe Lofgren. “These programs were created to compensate victims, not to force them into torturous litigation. Since its creation, the Captive Insurance Fund has managed to only pay five claims. At the same time the fund has spent millions in litigation expenses fighting countless other claims. This hearing is an important first step in guaranteeing that the victims receive the compensation they are entitled to under the law.”

Previous Congressional investigations have focused on how the federal government should provide health care services for individuals whose health was adversely impacted by the effects of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Today’s hearing is the first time that Congress focused specifically on the economic losses of those individuals. Many people incurred such losses when they became too sick to work and lost their jobs, while others have inadequate health insurance, and are struggling with exorbitant medical bills.

The hearing examined different compensation approaches used thus far to address 9/11-related economic losses, such as the World Trade Center Victim Compensation Fund (VCF) and the World Trade Center Captive Insurance Company. Reps. Nadler and Lofgren noted that the Captive Insurance Company, created by Congress with a $1 billion appropriation, has spent millions of dollars in administrative and legal costs to contest, rather than to pay, claims.

Lawmakers also examined the specific problems arising for first responders, workers, local residents, students and other individuals whose illnesses did not become apparent for months or years after September 11, as well as individuals who may become sick in the future. The hearing also provided a venue to consider possible solutions to provide the necessary relief to affected individuals who have and will continue to experience losses, but have thus far seen little or no compensation.

Also, last week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals found that New York City and its contractors are not immune from lawsuits that have been filed by first responders, residents, area workers, students, and others who were exposed to the environmental toxins and other hazards during the clean-up at the World Trade Center site.

Rep. Nadler’s opening statement, as prepared, follows:

“First, let me thank Congresswoman Lofgren for agreeing to hold this oversight hearing. Thank you.

“This joint hearing of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law will investigate the status of compensation for the tens of thousands of people who are suffering because of the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11. While other Congressional investigations have focused on the ongoing health crisis, and this committee has previously investigated the disastrous response to the environmental catastrophe, no previous inquiry has focused on compensation for the victims.

“I want to welcome our witnesses and thank them for participating. We are fortunate to have an expert panel with us today to discuss the past successes, current challenges, and proposed solutions in the ongoing struggle to provide proper compensation to the victims of 9/11.

“I would also like to recognize those individuals who have traveled to Washington today to attend this hearing, and thank you for coming. Many of are the very people who have been denied proper compensation thus far, and I hope that we can learn today about why the system has failed so many of you.

“After the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11, tens of thousands of first responders, residents, area workers, and students were exposed to a cocktail of toxic substances said to be worse than the Kuwaiti oil fires. They are now coming down with diseases like sarcoidosis, lymphoma, and rare blood cancers. Last June, Senator Clinton and I held companion hearings on the actions of the Environmental Protection Administration and other federal agencies that allowed workers to work in a toxic environment without proper protection and gave them false assurances as to their safety.

“At the House hearing, we heard the callous voice of former EPA Administrator Christie Todd Whitman try to explain why she told New Yorkers that the “air was safe to breathe” when, in fact, she had evidence to the contrary. We reviewed the EPA Inspector General’s report which found that her statements “were falsely reassuring, lacked a scientific basis, and were politically motivated.” We heard about how the White House changed EPA press releases, ‘to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones.’

“Obviously, none of the injuries we are talking about would have occurred were it not for the terrorists, who are ultimately to blame, but many or most would have been avoided if the Federal Government had acted in a responsible manner. The federal government, therefore, has a moral and legal obligation to compensate the victims of 9/11 and to provide for their health.

“Many hearings have examined the health issues and we have heard from many who are too sick to work. And we must assume that many more will become sick in the future. In a September 2006 peer-reviewed study conducted by the World Trade Center Medical Monitoring Program, of 9,500 WTC responders, almost 70 percent of them had a new or worsened respiratory symptom that developed during or after their time working at Ground Zero. Furthermore, another study documented that, on average, a New York City firefighter who responded to the World Trade Center has experienced a loss of 12 years of lung capacity.

“Which brings us to today’s hearing. We have with us the former Special Master of the federal Victim Compensation Program who was responsible for providing approximately $7.1 billion in compensation to the families of those who lost their lives and to those injured in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. He paid claims of about 2900 families of the deceased and 2500 people with physical injuries including respiratory illnesses. The funds he distributed were tax free and every award took into account the recoveries from collateral sources, such as private insurance, pensions, and workers compensation. Claims payments were halted because of a statutory expiration date.

“We will also hear from Mike Valentin a police officer and 9/11 first responder who can no longer work, and who long ago exhausted his prescription drug coverage and is now fighting to keep his family financially afloat. Unfortunately, his case is all too typical.

“New York City Corporation Counsel Michael Cardozo will discuss the World Trade Center Captive Insurance Company, which established with a $1 billion Congressional appropriation, has spent millions of dollars in administrative and legal costs to contest, rather than to pay, claims filed by first responders and other individuals whom Congress intended to assist. Only a handful of claims have been paid, and none of those have been related to the respiratory problems that so many suffer. I look forward to hearing from him how many claims have been paid out and what he sees as the challenges to compensating 9/11 victims.

“I am sure he will discuss last week’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision, denying New York City and its contractors immunity from World Trade Center-related lawsuits. Some 8,000 victims have filed suit, claiming that they “suffered respiratory injuries due to the failure of the City and the Port Authority to monitor those conditions and to provide them with adequate safety equipment, and/or warn them of the hazards.”

“Finally, I look forward to the testimony of Dr. Jim Melius who is an expert on the proposed legislative solutions to reopen the victim compensation program and to provide for the long term health needs of those affected by the attacks of 9/11.
“I would like to note that my colleagues, Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney and Congressman Vito Fossella, and I have introduced the 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, which would provide comprehensive medical treatment to any person whose health was affected, and reopen the Victim Compensation Fund so that people can be compensated for their economic losses.

“The pain and suffering of the living victims of 9/11 is real and cannot be ignored. I think it is clear that we, as a nation, must do more. During the final months of the Civil War, President Lincoln, in his Second Inaugural Address, noted that the nation had to beyond mourning the dead and needed to look towards what could be done to help the nation recover and reconstruct. Nearly seven years after 9/11, and we are in the same position. We must, as Lincoln remarked, “bind up the nation’s wounds [and] care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow, and his orphan.”

“I hope that as we continue to bring the truth to light through these hearings, we can do a better job of repaying a debt that can never fully be repaid to the victims and heroes of 9/11.”

#$*@!O#)$...

#$*@!O#)$Darrell Issa#$*@!O#)$.#$*@!O#)$.

Edit: I'm just curious. The individual that voted this blog down, please explain. Do you not want the responders to get help? Do you agree with Rep. Issa?

Edit Part II:
GOP Rep. Darrell Issa under fire from everywhere after 9/11 comments

Source: nydailynews.com

BY RICHARD SISK and MICHAEL McCAULIFF
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS
Thursday, April 3rd 2008, 4:00 AM

WASHINGTON - The California congressman who called the Sept. 11 attacks "simply" a plane crash ran for cover Wednesday under a barrage of ridicule from fellow Republicans, first responders and victims' families.

San Diego GOP Rep. Darrell Issa was under siege for suggesting the federal government had already done enough to help New York cope with "a fire" that "simply was an aircraft" hitting the World Trade Center.

"That is a pretty distorted view of things," said Frank Fraone, a Menlo Park, Calif., fire chief who led a 67-man crew at Ground Zero. "Whether they're a couple of planes or a couple of missiles, they still did the same damage."

"New York was attacked by Al Qaeda. It doesn't have to be attacked by Congress," added Long Island Rep. Pete King, a Republican.

"I'm really surprised by Darrell Issa," King added. "It showed such a cavalier dismissal of what happened to New York. It's wrong and inexcusable."

Lorie Van Auken, who lost her husband, Kenneth, in the attacks, slammed Issa's "cruel and heartless" comments.

"It's really discouraging. People stepped up and did the right thing. They sacrificed themselves and now a lot of people are getting really horrible illnesses," she added.

Under pressure from all sides, the Golden State pol - who got rich selling car alarms after getting busted for car theft as a teen - pulled a partial U-turn. He issued a statement but cowered from the press.

"I continue to support federal assistance for the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks," he said.

But he didn't retract his wacked-out rhetoric claiming the feds "just threw" buckets of cash at New York for an attack "that had no dirty bomb in it, it had no chemical munitions in it."

He went on: "I have to ask ... why the firefighters who went there and everybody in the city of New York needs to come to the federal government for the dollars versus this being primarily a state consideration."

In his statement yesterday, Issa insisted he only "asked tough questions about the expenditures" during a hearing Tuesday on an aid bill for sick New Yorkers.

"He realized he stepped in it," said Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-Manhattan), who was leading the hearing when Issa popped off.

"The sound I'm hearing is him slamming the brakes and going in reverse," crowed Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-Brooklyn-Queens). Issa also belatedly admitted 9/11 was "an attack on America" in his statement.

It shouldn't have been that hard.

He took to the floor of Congress on Sept. 11, 2001, to argue passionately that America - not just New York - had been attacked, but conveniently forgot that during his Tuesday diatribe.

"It seems that with the passage of time, something happened along the way where the scope of the problem and the real extent of the problem has not drifted out to California," fumed Staten Island GOP Rep. Vito Fossella.

Health officials estimate it could cost $1 billion to care properly for the ailments that may emerge in the people who lived through the horror of Sept. 11 or breathed that toxic dust.

New York lawmakers now want Democratic leaders to bring the 9/11 care bill to the floor soon - before more members of Congress start spouting off like Issa.


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

I really...

Have to give Nadler props. With regard to this issue concerning the 9/11 attacks, he's done A LOT.


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

You have got...

... to be shitting me. Rep. Darrell Issa is... absolutely.... fucking.... ridiculous.

Jon, did you receive my e-mail? Please shoot me one. It's in RE: to the 9/11 Truth Synopsum in NE.
Thanks, in advance.

Regards,
Mark in Philly
http://www.Philly911Truth.org
http://www.SST911.org
http://www.FealGoodFoundation.com

You want to go with Bob and I?


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

Yes...

... if possible, yes!
Give me a call tomorrow evening, if ya can!

Regards,
Mark in Philly
http://www.Philly911Truth.org
http://www.SST911.org
http://www.FealGoodFoundation.com

Merci for link excellent video Larry Silverstein et Karl Rove

John A MITCHELL
Herblay FRANCE

bonjour ,

Thanks very much for the link to http://www.Philly911Truth.org

On this page the video of
...........WeAreChange.org and Philly911Truth.org confront Larry Silverstein.
...........http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtPC0W4HII8&eurl=http://www.philly911truth.org/
is excellent because the guys putting there questions are so polite and correct. There is just Larry Silverstein who comes out badly. And for people not knowing the cicumstances to put up his declarations on the "pull it" justifies absolutely their questions which Larry did not reply. As WeAreCahge say they will be back to Larry.

The second video with Karl Rove is also very important because there is new information on that morning. Any one who how to make a copy of this video ?

Having seen the video with detective Bo Dietl ==> http://www.911blogger.com/node/14412
Bush been booed at the 08 National Park's inaugural==> http://www.911blogger.com/node/14627
Interpellations on the Bill Mayer show
We Are CHANGE confronts Zbigniew Brzezinski Again!
... ... ... and the many others on 911blogger I am asking myself how are all these confrontations going to end.
How long will these Silversteins stand to be questioned like that ?
Yours John

Has this man any credentials

to make statements about "residues" of planes and buildings?

Issa's

number in DC is 202-225-3906 & in CA it's 760-599-5000.

I urge all to call him & strongly urge him to sign this bill.

With a group of great folks, I lobbyed for this bill in DC (H.R. 3543) & 3 out of 4 Congressman we visited
have already signed on.

BTW Jon, We got Congreeman Sestak to sign it!