""They aren't truth-tellers looking to save the world," she says. "They're con artists hoping to sucker conspiracy-theory paranoids or anti-government malcontents into shelling out their hard-earned dollars."

Sounds accurate to me...

Terrence said:
"
Sounds accurate to me..."

It has always been my understanding that the USAToday is the one of the more tarted up mouthpieces of the CIA... this article fails to address any of the questions, and frankly doens't mean a whole lot of anything.

for the record, i haven't made a single penny off of anything related to 9/11, and i never will. in fact ive spent a few thousand..

wish i didnt have to work, i'd like to write a reasonable response to the article..

Hey Terrence, what about him?

Is he a nut? Do you think he knows what he's talking about?

This is a big break of the truth movement. This article no matter what it said, will bring our cause more into the mainstream. I believe it will generate more intrest into the facts of 9/11. And eventually cause the majority of America to question the offical version given by the goverment. So I would say DONT PANIC to those who are worried about being called "con-artist". In time the facts will speak for themselves. All we want is for America to wake up and smell the coffee. And I believe it is happening because of articles such as these.

Yizzo,

yeah, people forget that metal is a good dissipater of heat.. i cool my P4 3.0ghz (running at 3.6ghz) using just heat pipes, and it works incredibly well..

this is pretty close to what i have:
http://www.thermaltake.com/images/coolers/ComboCool/cl-p0024tower112/enl...

My favorite lines from the article:

"The information revolution now gives us access to too much information,"

Too much information. Wow. Coming from a Communications professor.

"Internet chat rooms are full of promos for screenings of Loose Change"

Is that what journalists think blogs and forums are--chat rooms?

"Conspiracy theories are a kind of secular religion,"

That makes absolutely no sense. The definition of a moron--I mean oxymoron.

"We're always ready to believe something about which we know nothing,"

We know nothing? This has been all over the news and has been investigated by most of the world for 5 years. We know a lot. What we don't know is only the information that has been withheld by our own government.

While I slightly believe that as far as 9/11 truth, "no publicity is bad publicity" at this point, the article was anything but neutral. In several places, statements supposedly disproving the movie are put forth without citing any sources. And 90% of the article portrays Loose Change negatively, or downplays its significance condescendingly.

(please don't feed the Terrence)

does anyone know if this article appears in the print version of USA Today? or is it an online exclusive? thanks.

(please don't feed the Terrence)

:)

"The only thing they (the filmmakers) seem to have gotten right about the Sept. 11 attacks is the date when they occurred," says Debra Burlingame, whose brother was the pilot of American Flight 77 that crashed into the Pentagon.

hmmmmm, the sister of the "pilot" of Flight 77 bashing 9/11 truth? see a connection?

Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission (due in August, Knopf, $25.95) by Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton. The authors, the 9/11 panel's chairman and vice chairman, respectively, give a history of the commission.

looks like the head liars got another book deal.this should be an intresting read, i wonder if they will delve into WTC7 this time.

"hmmmmm, the sister of the "pilot" of Flight 77 bashing 9/11 truth? see a connection?"

For goodness sakes, do you clowns see a conspiracy behind EVERY door?

nope, it was actually just an observation, but it went right over your head as expected.

how did Dylan make WTC7 fall straight down like that for his film.

i guess when you're a millionaire filmmaker you can pull these kind of things off.

i have to wonder what kind of personal life a guy like Terrence or S.King has based on the fact that they spend so much time trying to "refute" the 9/11 truth movement.do you guys have jobs? girlfriends? friends? a life of any kind? what EXACTLY is your motivation for "refuting" us? what do you get out of it? we try to refute the governments "official" story because its the right thing to do, thats our motivation. what is YOUR motivation? what EXACTLY do you get out of shilling on this website every day? (seriously, get a job)

do you think your going to "convert" us into thinking the government told us the whole truth about that day? and if so, what do you get out of that? im just trying to understand your motivation for being here.

"Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission (due in August, Knopf, $25.95) by Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton. The authors, the 9/11 panel's chairman and vice chairman, respectively, give a history of the commission."

It seems like these 9/11 hucksters always have something to sell.

In this case; a "public myth".

yeah, and the shills of the world are saying 9/11 truthers are trying to exploit people and make money.HA.

You think Dick Cheney & Co. didn't make $$$ on Iraq?

are you trying to tell me that Dick has more cash than the zillionaire filmaker huckster Dylan?

you crazy pearanoids will do anything to push your T-Shirts.

Terrence, S. King:

Why did Bush remain surrounded by children, in his previously publicized schoolhouse location, long after it was clear that 2 planes had struck the WTC & America was under attack???

Why did WTC-7 implode in a controlled demolition, despite the facts that it was 350 feet from the nearest tower, had very little damage, & a few scattered fires??? Why did Silverstein, the leaseholder, when confronted with this inexplicable “collapse”, claim that he & the Fire Dept. pulled it???

Because 9/11 was an inside job, that's why!