Special "Worst President Ever" Presidents' Day Show on Dynamic Duo Monday 2/17

George W. Bush's legacy will include his complicity in 9/11 high treason and mass murder. "Worst president ever" doesn't even begin to do justice to this level of betrayal.

To celebrate the (hopefully) impending end of Bush's reign of terror--the last Presidents' Day with this incurious, sadistic borderline psychopath fouling up the White House--I have invited two of America's leading impeachment activists: Peter Thottam of http://www.BCIMPEACH.com and LA 9/11 Truth and Debra Sweet of http://www.worldcantwait.net

I understand that Peter may be turning away from impeachment activism toward supporting Obama, which I'm not sure is a good idea. Webster Tarpley has made a good case that Obama is a dangerous NWO front-man, and that Hilary, for all her faults, would be a small step toward reorienting the political system in favor of ordinary working people, who are being bled dry by the NWO globalists.

I always hate to admit it when Webster's right--he's so darn smart it gets annoying--but the more the glazed-eyed pseudo-educated sheeple swoon over Obama, the more I want our first black president to be Cynthia McKinney. Check out these vapid Obama zombies chattering about how 9/11 truthers got thrown out of a recent Obama rally in my home town of Madison, WI:
http://www.thedailypage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=507115&highlight=#507115

Anyway, I've given Webster plenty of air time to make his case (see http://www.mujca.com/airwaves.htm) so now it's Peter's turn. He'll do the first 90 minutes, then Debra will have the last half-hour.

http://www.gcnlive.com network 4 call-in 866-582-9933

The "Dynamic Duo"--with FETZER?

You're continuing association with both Fetzer and Tarpley ( after he has refused to apologize for attacking Cindy Sheehan Dahlia Wasfi and other), makes you an embarrassment to 911Truth.

Pack your bags, Kev--911Truth does not need your "help" anymore.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pP6kKcKxyyA
______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
http://truthaction.org/forum/
http://www.911blacklist.org/

What is your real name, and what have you contributed?

All I've ever seen is vicious, divisive attacks under a ridiculous pseudonym.
If you are a real person, please email me: kevin@mujca.com so we can reassure each other of our humanity and commitment to 9/11 truth.
Otherwise I'll have to assume Tarpley's right about one more thing.

Your negative impact has been clearly demonstrated.

"What is your real name?" That might be the most perfect example of an ad hominem distraction I've seen. "Vicious, divisive attacks" would be what Tarpley did at the "Ready for Mainstream" conference. Its really small of you to question the humanity of someone posting here. CJS demonstrates more humanity in criticizing you than you've shown in supporting Tarpley. And many of us sincerely question the nature of your "commitment to 9/11 truth." Oh, you probably think you care about it. But being relatively educated and yet acting in such an irrational manner, its hard for many of us to accept.

I don't care how folksy you appear on the radio or in person. You support people known for divisive behavior. I don't care about the fact that you have done some good things for this movement. The negative things you have done can not be excused. I really don't care about your level of education. You don't behave in a logical or strategically savvy manner. CJS and others have PROVEN WITH EVIDENCE in their reporting on your actions that you serve to undermine the strength of this movement. And after hearing your simple minded advocacy of the 'big tent' approach, I'm convinced.

I have a policy of addressing behavior such as this, but not being drawn into a long distracting argument. I will get back to paying no attention to your contribution to this movement. However, I'm glad there are other more disposed to do so, who will continue to chip away at this false reputation you've developed for being invested in our progress.

MP3 Audio Clip - Kevin Barrett & Lynn Margulis

Sunday January 27, 2008
Lynn Margulis, Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Geosciences at the University of Massachusett, Amherst, Talks To Kevin Barrett About Meeting David Ray Griffin And Watching The Japanese Congress Debate 9/11 And The "War On Terror" (15 Min Clip Of 2 Hour Interview - 6 Meg)

* source = http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/
-----------------------------------

More MP3 Audio Clips >

(My name is Edward Rynearson - Kevin Barrett has been and is an inspiration for me)

Kevin walks the walk . . . see for yourself
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=kevin+barrett&search_type=

There are other clips too . . .

Morgan Reynolds and Kevin Barrett at Wisconsin 9/11 conf
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp98T8rOcPs

And thanks to the support of Reynolds, this video has over 100,000 views on YouTube, probably was seen by millions at the time of its viewing --

Morgan Reynolds on FOX News on the Anniversary
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8&feature=related

Show "How to tell who's real and who's fake" by Kevin Barrett

"Fetzer and Tarpley would score fairly high"

Of course they would. Calling people agents to a public audience on the Anniversary . . . describing peace activists as liars . . . if that's not real humanity, I don't know what is!

The issue is not about anyone's decision to use pseudonyms -- just about everyone uses them on public forums, for good reason, but those same people often also use their own names in other areas or do important significant work that most people support and which positively benefits our understanding of the attacks -- it's about the average activist's frustrations with those who continue to promote individuals who are disruptive to groups and / or are advocating nonsense, weakest evidence or making significant mistakes in their presentations.

The concern here is that most people would not rate Fetzer or Tarpley high, yet you do, and you don't seem to mind that your position is at odds with most activists. Instead, you try to focus on whose name is what, who is a "coward," etc. It's not about the who, it's about the behavior.

To Kevin's detractors...

When commenting in Barrett's blog posts, comment on the content of his blog entries, if you would.

There are clearly other places to discuss the pros and cons of Barrett's associations;
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1887&start=90&postdays=0&po...

Thanks!