Good for him to speak out, but he needs to fix the typo in his personal profile. It looks unprofessional. GW corrected it in his blog, however.

/////////////////////
http://www.swatcash.com/dhs

Richard Gage is a hero of the 9/11 truth movement. I'm so glad to see ae911truth.org linked at TheShellGame.net so that as that NY Times best selling novel brings eyes to the site, they see ae911truth.org

I spent countless hours emailing ae911truth.org to physics and engineering departments across the world . . . and now as The Shell Game's popularity increases, people come to find ae911truth.org linked there, rather than me having to work my tail off to get more eyes to ae911truth.org s critically important work.

TOGETHER, the veils are dropping. TOGETHER the waters of truth are becoming too massive for the powers that be to suppress much longer.

This is great news that Richard Humenn is calling for an "international group of professionals to investigate all plausible causes for the virtual freefall and the almost total destruction of the WTC structures." Let's assume that by "professionals" he means professional engineers and not professional politicians or professional think-tank members, as per the so-called 9/11 Commission.

Okay, here's my proposal in support of this cause. Can somebody out there put together a videograph grouping of, say, about 20 videos of known computer-controlled demolitions together with a video of WTC Building 7? The idea would be to show these to the general public, both on the Internet and in theaters, and ask "Can anybody identify which of these building collapses is a World Trade center building?" If the collapses are shown one after the other -- or perhaps even side-by-side -- I seriously doubt there would be more than two or three in a hundred who could correctly identify the WTC 7 collapse.

Why? Obviously because the collapse of WTC 7 looks exactly like your typical computer-controlled demolition. Now, if it looks exactly like your typical computer-controlled demolition, the most probable explanation for that would be that it is your typical computer-controlled demolition.

The videograph voice-over would then challenge the audience with something like: "Okay, if anybody out there has a more probable explanation, based on sound engineering principles -- not political or religious rhetoric -- for how WTC 7 collapsed, please present your case now."

At this point I believe the case would be won and the official fiction of the 9/11 Commission would be exposed for what it truly is, nothing more than cheap government propaganda. Why am I so confident? Because there is simply no reasonable argument that any engineer has put forth so far for the total collapse of WTC 7, with synchronous truss failures on each floor with each floor failing perfectly in sequence.

Finally, the voice-over could explain that if all you had to do to collapse a building totally and neatly within its own footprint was to start a few small fires on a few floors and then just sit back and watch it implode, then all the demolition companies would quickly be put out of business by imbecile arsonists who could provide the same demolition services at 5 percent of the cost. Clearly, this is never going to happen. People who believe the official fiction of 9/11 believe it for one reason only: They simply can't get their mind around the fact that there are rogues within our official government who intentionally lie to the public in order to accomplish their rogue agenda that they know the public would otherwise never support.

Visit http://www.sillyConValley.net for the story of high-tech turned against us.