Thats great stuff, I figured he wouldn't be saying anything, so I didn't bother watching. This was a pleasant surprise this morning.

Same here, I was surprised it was even brought up. Kimmel has got some guts putting his show at risk. I wonder how well his show do in the ratings?

By the way I came across this article on flight 93 landing in Cleveland on the morning of 9/11. Can any confirm this if it's true or not?

http://web.archive.org/web/20021109040132/http://wcpo.com/specials/2001/...

Today is a GREAT day. Happy Easter everybody.

Kind of sad that you dildos get all excited with what a hack like Charlie S says on late, late, night TV..

I'd like to take this opportunity to re-iterate that not a single structural engineer has supported the 9/11 theory of controlled demolition of the WTC towers. And in fact, every single structural engineer in the entire US (and the world as far as I know) finds the official explanation more than adequate. Only you nutjobs who are not experts think otherwise...

You're funny, terrence, I like you.

Lets see if you can explain the following facts on buildings 5 and 6...

-both stood closer to buildings 1 and 2 than building 7 did
-both had much thinner steel columns than buildings 1, 2 and 7
-both suffered far more damage than building 7 after the collapsing of buildings 1 and 2
-both did not collapse, yet building 7 did

Charlie Sheen was absolutely fantastic last night and so was host Jimmy Kimmel!!! (Kimmel got into it immediately!)
They are both risking a great deal to question the “official story” of 9/11. I think we should send them much e-mail in appreciation of their efforts.

http://abc.go.com/primetime/jimmykimmel/

http://www.bravocharlie911.com/

Nice YouTube video of Sheen/Kimmel here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UmxPYiP9go&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Epriso...

We should just ban the people who are paid to distract us.

ON TOPIC: Charlie sheen did a great job. I think he made he case that he's completely justified in questioning what happened on 9/11, and that as of yet, nobody has "challenged him on the facts."

"We should just ban the people who are paid to distract us."

Paid? You paranoids crack me up.

Besides, the moderators here have attempted to censor and ban me already. Which is typical of true-believers who don't like unpleasant questions being asked of their faith...

Wow, not a single engineer supported the contolled demolition theory. I'm really convinced now. Thanks for challenging me on the facts.

I'm surprised though to see the sales of aluminium foils are starting to slow down now. Damn those 9/11 truth seekers for spreading out facts and convincing a whole lot of people into doubting the official story. The CEO's of aluminium foil corporation must be steaming pissed by now.

"We should just ban the people who are paid to distract us."

Paid? You paranoids crack me up.

Besides, the moderators here have attempted to censor and ban me already. Which is typical of true-believers who don't like unpleasant questions being asked of their faith...
Terrence | Homepage | 04.15.06 - 10:55 am | #

Thank you, moderators. Keep it up. Another vote here for banning and deleting posts by trolls.

I guess Thomas Keen never responded to this letter to him re: WTC-7,
http://www.aztlan.net/911_commission.htm

OK, why not challenge Terrence on the facts? He says not a single structural engineer supports a theory of controlled demolition. I'm not expert on the controlled demolition angle. Is his statement accurate? If so, say so. If not, say why not.

Terrence

It doesnt matter if a single structural engineer supports us, or a million engineers supports us. not a single one of them can defy the laws of physics!

1.) 47 stories + 6.6 seconds + pancake = impossible

THIS CAN NOT BE DUPLICATED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHATSO-EVER!!!!!!

2.) symmetrical collapse from a fire that does not spread throughout the entire building = impossible

THIS ALSO CAN NOT BE DUPLICATED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHATSO-EVER!!!!!!

3) Trusses and columns that do not burn extremely hot, and burn less than an hour do not have enough energy to RIP 47 columns from a building SIMULTANEOUSLY

...There are much more GLARING facts that do not need the approval of any Engineer to state its impossiblity

That's what Terrence (Sky King) wants you to do: waste your time debating him instead of doing actual research.

I'm all for challenging actual official story-believers on the facts.

Terrence needs someone with a PHD to hold his hand crossing the street.

Bannanation!

The top story at Terrence's home page states that WTC7 collapsed because of the impact of the planes.

I watched the Sheen interview last night live, and frankly, I was a bit disappointed. Sheen seemed nervous discussing 9/11 on Kimmel, and was dismissive by just having "questions". Perhaps he could have turned the tables on his 9/11 detractors and lampooned the official story as a big joke- after all, it was a late night comedy talk show. My 2 cents. Pleased to see this morning that everyone liked the interview. Maybe I was just tired, or expecting too much. I am also pleased that Sheen supposedly talked to Alex right after being on. That's an alliance that's VERY GOOD for this Movement!

JJ

Terrence, please read this:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/3/23/194856/702

Seriously though: is there a structural engineer who supports us?

sorry - I didn't see the post above until after I posted...

darryl: probably.

Terry, perhaps no structural engineers want to be fired & blacklisted like chemist Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratories was when he dared questioned WTC-7.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451
After all, anyone offensive to our Glorious Führer Bush may incur the rath of the 4th Reich!