I happened to come across the History Channel while looking for a sports show and saw they were explaining how building 7 came down. What a joke. Trouble is most of the sheep believe it.

.

I just had to post this very informed comment from Brad's Blog. The last part is his speculation on why this is happening. The implications are frightening.

To Michael of Brad Blog sorry I stole your post.

------

COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
... Michael said on 1/6/2008 @ 7:44 am PT...

Let me pass this along:

My problem with this article is, that it is published in The Sunday Times, which is one of the worst war advocate and profiteer Murdoch's propaganda papers. 'The Sunday Times' and propaganda-media owner Rupert Murdoch, have for as long as is known cooperated with the CIA/Mossad, the UK's MI5 and MI6 and the rest of the spooks.

Murdoch's papers write about the 9/11 massacre, but still - contrary to the truth - stick to the official US/UK version and brainwashing: Osama's bin Laden's ragheads did it.

Nothing in those pro-war papers gets published - and certainly not this kind of 'information' in those outlets - that isn't aimed at certain groups. If you check the source, you'll see that Murdoch is a disinformation pest for mankind.

So, I'm inclined to say that @S. Balu is quite correct, in seeing the item as 'CIA/Mossad propaganda'.

In reality it was as Tony S. writes: "The CIA pressed Dutch govt. not to interfear, (this must be a Freudian slip... -HR) claiming they were after more suspects surrounding Khan.

That's how he got away with the stolen nuclear secrets. This was publicly stated by Ruud Lubbers, former Dutch Prime Minister a couple of years ago."

And Lubbers - who also was the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - stated clearly that the CIA and its managers are guilty of nuclear proliferation. - Url.: xxxx

Now: we know that Sibel Edmunds has a unique 'gag order' as 'The Sunday Times' in this article describes. And that this 'gag order' is global and until further notice by the US/UK junta's henchmen: "The US attorney-general has imposed a state secrets privilege order on her, which prevents her revealing more details of the FBI’s methods and current investigations."

So it's logical to ask why Sibel Edmunds now is published worldwide, and - the gag order doesn't count here - is allowed to be quoted by Murdoch's paper and read by everybody?

Why, who and on what level was 'permission' given for this in the US and decided to publish this about the nuke proliferation?

Concerning Sibel Edmunds, the use which is made of her and to what she now is said to have heard and seen: ''Her story shows just how much the West was infiltrated by foreign states seeking nuclear secrets. It illustrates how western government officials turned a blind eye to, or were even helping, countries such as Pakistan acquire bomb technology.

The wider nuclear network has been monitored for many years by a joint Anglo-American intelligence effort. But rather than shut it down, investigations by law enforcement bodies such as the FBI and Britain’s Revenue & Customs have been aborted to preserve diplomatic relations.'' [end excerpt]

According to this not to be trusted article: "Khan was close to Ahmad and the ISI. While running Pakistan’s nuclear programme, he became a millionaire by selling atomic secrets to Libya, Iran and North Korea."

Meaning: whom can we blame for the next - probably nuclear - 'false flag' operation? Those "infiltrated foreign states seeking nuclear secrets"?

We all know that the Pakistani 'spooky thugs' from ISI, are the 'little brothers' of the CIA/Mossad, trained and many times paid by them, and get most of their orders from them. There are small rogue groups too, and those are not only dangerous but can be used to set up 'black ops'.

So the one to blame - like the stop of the Dakar rally - xxxx - is again the fictitious 'al Qaeda' and the dead Osama bin Laden, just referring to the timeline here:

"2001 - Weeks before 9/11, Khan’s aides meet Osama Bin Laden to discuss an Al-Qaeda nuclear device."

The drumbeat in the major media now will be: and the rogue states got 'm!

Original article in Murdoch's propaganda paper 'The Sunday Times' - xxxx

This is a world of smoke and mirrors, but, as the old Sahrahoui said:

"Never drink from a well you don't know."

-------end------

Where's the rest of Sibel's actual story? Because she only released some of the details about state secrets sold and some details about 9/11 warnings, she left herself open to having the story used by Murdoch incorrectly. Did she see any interoffice memos or hear anything about the real perpetrators of 9/11?

"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." -- President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

==================================================================
"There are none so hoplessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." (Goethe)

(dancing Israeli's) makes an interesting statment about judeo-supremacism (the "opposite" of antisemitism): Judaism teaches that other beliefs are phony and attacks these beliefs.
How can anyone using a bit of logic and morality not conclude that a real God wouldn't have "chosen" people, dagrading the rest of people to the level of cattle? But it seems like it is just this belief that makes it possible to conduct 9/11's and don't have a "bad conscience" about it. Since it helps the chosen people, the jewish ruling elite has no difficulties sacrificing gentiles and low level jews who are at the wrong place at the wrong time. World war 2 was the same; elite zionist jews financed Hitler to pressure ordinary jews to resettle in Palestine to fight the Arab's and build up Israel.

Hey, easy there. Every religion has it's ups and downs. I do not think it is fair to blame any one religion for the violent actions of 9-11. My country (Philippines) has been invaded and ravaged by Catholic Spain, Protestant US and Shinto Japan. If anything, I think it is opportunistic politicians and power brokers who take advantage of religion and it's usefulness to control people.

--------------------------------------------
WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy-
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/384
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-
http://www.ae911truth.

He now seems ready to throw Antiwar.com editorial weight behind a new look at 9/11. This is an incredably influential site that reaches people of all political affiliations accross the US.

At the end of the Raimondo article, he suggests:

"...If a nuke ever goes off in an American city, it will probably have been stolen from our own arsenal – once the American people wake up to that scary fact, the rest will follow automatically."

Is this advanced preparation of an alibi, a preparation to point the finger at AlQuaeda again? Times Online (Murdoch) + Raimondo =/= 911Truth

-------------------------------------------------------------------
WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy-
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/384
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-
http://www.ae911truth.org

When they remove the 9/11 Truth gag order from their own writer/contributers then we know antiwar.com has changed.

I hope they do.
Radical Pragmatist