Recent Headlines

Carlyle, Kissinger, SAIC and Halliburton: A 9/11 Convergence
Investigate Waste, Fraud & Abuse at NIST
Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Recent Media

WTC 7 report set for summer 2008 release

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.

The delayed National Institute of Standards and Technology report on the collapse of the World Trade Center 7 following the 9/11 terrorist attack in 2001 will be released for public comment this July. A final version will be published a month later, in August 2008. NIST’s investigation of the WTC 7 collapse was supposed to have been completed by the end of 2006, but more complex, and time-consuming, computer simulations, along with a consideration of some additional evidence (mainly architectural and construction documents and plans), has stretched out the process, according to Michael E. Newman of NIST.

...

Some 9/11 conspiracy theorists maintain that WTC 7 was “pulled down” in a controlled demolition ordered by the government, an allegation that has been advanced by celebrity “9/11 Truthers” Charlie Sheen and Rosie O’Donnell. While there has been no credible evidence produced for these claims, they have been a staple of those arguing that 9/11 was part of a sinister government conspiracy.
...

http://www.bloggernews.net/112871

***

Comment:

#

Quote. While there has been no credible evidence produced for these claims. Endqoute

No wonder, if you only mention celebrities regarding credible evidence.

What about the Scolars for 911 Truth and Justice or the Architecs and Engineers for 911 truth?

There’s proof, I mean 100% fact-checked proof, that not only WTC7 was demolished by purpose. And that’s hard to say, as intelligent minds tend to doubt and the conclusion is hard for imagination.

What to do now?

"Based on the WTC 7 inquiry’s careful and measured approach to date, we are likely to find that the NIST report this summer offers well-founded reasons for the building’s structural failure, and provides them in a transparent way."

Yeah, sure.

No matter that the reasons for its structural failure could have been determined by a careful examination of the debris on the site.

Delaying of the report gives us skeptics an opportunity to try to make people aware of the issue.

I'd appreciate your advice on and views of the following.

There is no indication that the observations made by Richard Gage during the NIST meeting last month will be considered. NIST is trying to bypass these issues as "conspiracy theory stuff". The question is: what can WE do to pressure NIST to take them into account -- at least in some way?

Also, is it possible to make a FOIA request for NIST to get the photos and videos of WTC 7 and the Twin Towers captured on 9/11?

Nice work btw

To those who went to the tedious bother of cleaning Jefferson's clock with comments.