* I can dream, can't I?

Right now I'd settle for a similar treatment by Amy Goodman on Democracy Now.

(still not quite awake, I guess)

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Yes it was a very pleasant experience that the anchor was so helpful.
I believe he simply gave us the same professional service that he normally gives to other guests in order to help them communicate their message.
But that is so unlike most other examples of how MSM treats 911truth.
Of course what little information we actually managed to squeeze into those 7 minutes matters in itself, but I believe the more important message of that broadcast was actually that the anchor treated us respectfully.
By doing that he signals to the viewers that it is OK to engage in a friendly and meaningful conversation about 911truth, and that people don't have to shy away from this agenda and the persons who promulgates it.
He is shaping the groupthink attitude positively towards 911truth (pardon my English)
After doing this interview people I know from my local area, who weren't aware of my interest in 911truth approached me smilingly, and commented on my appearance. Not so much to talk about the actual issue, but mostly to give the usual appreciation that you give to someone you know who has appeared in MSM... the '15 minutes of fame' effect i guess.
I take this as confirmation of the subliminal groupthink-message that was conveyed by the broadcast, and I doubt that these same persons would have approached me regarding this broadcast, if the TV-anchor had been hostile to us.
I am very hesitant about exposing myself as a 'conspiracy nut' in my local area, where I interact with parents of my own children's friends from kindergarten, and I have always visualized these encounters in a somewhat hostile setting.
Now after this feedback from people who watched the broadcast, I am able to envisage a more friendly dialoque, which is rarely portrayed in 911truth-videos of citizen encounters.
It is a very constructive feeling to be able to imagine 911truth discussions with nontruthers in a friendly atmosphere... You should try that yourself sometime ;-)

911truthing doesn't have to be a hostile and defensive proposition.

Of course the question that lingers in the back of my mind is - why?
Why does MSM in Denmark 'suddenly' allow 911truth to be handled nicely?
Have any of you watched the movie "The Insurgents"?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0758757/
This movie couples 911truth to truckbomb-making. It plays right into the HR1955 radicalization-act meme.
Maybe the MSM is changing mode from ignoring 911truth to more directly attacking it. Because they can no longer keep it ignored, they prefer to keep the initiative on how to shape the MSM communication of 911truth.
I must say that I found it somewhat disturbing that the points brought up in this movie during the 'motivational 911truth-speech' were so much alike those points that I brought up in the broadcast.

Regards, Jakob Hede Madsen.

"...Of course the question that lingers in the back of my mind is - why?
Why does MSM in Denmark 'suddenly' allow 911truth to be handled nicely?..."

Hi Jakob. Congratulations on getting 7 friendly and educational minutes in MSM. Whenever I see 9-11 truth on MSM, even on progressive US media, I rejoice as it is so rare, but I also wonder how this got through and everything else is kept away from the public. Is there disinformation involved or is the media cracking open, perhaps fearing that if they keep too tight a lid on truth they will lose all credibility and people will turn to the internet or other sources of news. I have read someone theorize that the media may in fact open the lid very slowly, letting the truth out in a trickle. As in the Kennedy assassination case, by the time the majority of the public knew, the issue had faded and no critical mass of people was prepared to act together to precipitate a change.

Good luck to you and fellow truthers in Denmark.

Regards from the Philippines

--------------------------------------------
WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy -
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/384
WTC was destroyed by controlled demo -
http://www.ae911truth.org
False flag operation in Manila? - http://www.inquirer.net/specialreports/gloriettablast/view.php?db=1&arti...

You handled the interview quite professionally, which had a very positive effect. I am sure that many more people viewing the show have been motivated to learn more about 9/11 as a result.

MrEguy

Jakob,

You offered very calmly your view on 9/11 Truth in a simple and easy to digest manner. Jakob and Niels could not have been better in their limited segment! Hats off to you, both.

Niels provided such a powerfully glib response that the Building 7 video clip speaks for itself. The video clip and the glib commentary makes it powerful stuff! The Building 7 demolition clip remains one of the toughest hurdles for those who want to perpetuate the official story!

Jakob, your observation is insightful. The context of the interview that it's acceptable to discuss 9/11 Truth, sends a powerful subliminal message! It's perhaps the most important aspect?

...don't believe them!